Literature DB >> 27697593

What's the gist? The influence of schemas on the neural correlates underlying true and false memories.

Christina E Webb1, Indira C Turney1, Nancy A Dennis2.   

Abstract

The current study used a novel scene paradigm to investigate the role of encoding schemas on memory. Specifically, the study examined the influence of a strong encoding schema on retrieval of both schematic and non-schematic information, as well as false memories for information associated with the schema. Additionally, the separate roles of recollection and familiarity in both veridical and false memory retrieval were examined. The study identified several novel results. First, while many common neural regions mediated both schematic and non-schematic retrieval success, schematic recollection exhibited greater activation in visual cortex and hippocampus, regions commonly shown to mediate detailed retrieval. More effortful cognitive control regions in the prefrontal and parietal cortices, on the other hand, supported non-schematic recollection, while lateral temporal cortices supported familiarity-based retrieval of non-schematic items. Second, both true and false recollection, as well as familiarity, were mediated by activity in left middle temporal gyrus, a region associated with semantic processing and retrieval of schematic gist. Moreover, activity in this region was greater for both false recollection and false familiarity, suggesting a greater reliance on lateral temporal cortices for retrieval of illusory memories, irrespective of memory strength. Consistent with previous false memory studies, visual cortex showed increased activity for true compared to false recollection, suggesting that visual cortices are critical for distinguishing between previously viewed targets and related lures at retrieval. Additionally, the absence of common visual activity between true and false retrieval suggests that, unlike previous studies utilizing visual stimuli, when false memories are predicated on schematic gist and not perceptual overlap, there is little reliance on visual processes during false memory retrieval. Finally, the medial temporal lobe exhibited an interesting dissociation, showing greater activity for true compared to false recollection, as well as for false compared to true familiarity. These results provided an indication as to how different types of items are retrieved when studied within a highly schematic context. Results both replicate and extend previous true and false memory findings, supporting the Fuzzy Trace Theory.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  False memory; Familiarity; Recollection; Schema; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27697593      PMCID: PMC5354939          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.09.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  80 in total

Review 1.  The anatomy of language: contributions from functional neuroimaging.

Authors:  C J Price
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  A PET study of stimulus- and task-induced semantic processing.

Authors:  U Noppeney; C J Price
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Conscious recollection and illusory recognition: an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  G C von Zerssen; A Mecklinger; B Opitz; D Y von Cramon
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance.

Authors:  C S Carter; T S Braver; D M Barch; M M Botvinick; D Noll; J D Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Building on prior knowledge: schema-dependent encoding processes relate to academic performance.

Authors:  Marlieke T R van Kesteren; Mark Rijpkema; Dirk J Ruiter; Richard G M Morris; Guillén Fernández
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing.

Authors:  G R Loftus; N H Mackworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Cortical analysis of visual context.

Authors:  Moshe Bar; Elissa Aminoff
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 8.  Top-down and bottom-up attention to memory: a hypothesis (AtoM) on the role of the posterior parietal cortex in memory retrieval.

Authors:  Elisa Ciaramelli; Cheryl L Grady; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  How schema and novelty augment memory formation.

Authors:  Marlieke T R van Kesteren; Dirk J Ruiter; Guillén Fernández; Richard N Henson
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 13.837

10.  Schemas and memory consolidation.

Authors:  Dorothy Tse; Rosamund F Langston; Masaki Kakeyama; Ingrid Bethus; Patrick A Spooner; Emma R Wood; Menno P Witter; Richard G M Morris
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  How to optimize knowledge construction in the brain.

Authors:  Marlieke Tina Renée van Kesteren; Martijn Meeter
Journal:  NPJ Sci Learn       Date:  2020-05-01

2.  Differentiating True and False Schematic Memories in Older Adults.

Authors:  Christina E Webb; Nancy A Dennis
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Category-Biased Neural Representations Form Spontaneously during Learning That Emphasizes Memory for Specific Instances.

Authors:  Stefania R Ashby; Dagmar Zeithamova
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 6.709

4.  Memory for the usual: the influence of schemas on memory for non-schematic information in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Christina E Webb; Nancy A Dennis
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Fornix white matter microstructure differentially predicts false recollection rates in older and younger adults.

Authors:  Jordan D Chamberlain; Indira C Turney; Jordan T Goodman; Jonathan G Hakun; Nancy A Dennis
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.054

6.  Word Familiarity Modulated the Effects of Category Familiarity on Memory Performance.

Authors:  Xueling Ning; Cuihong Li; Jiongjiong Yang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-08

7.  Schema representations in distinct brain networks support narrative memory during encoding and retrieval.

Authors:  Rolando Masís-Obando; Kenneth A Norman; Christopher Baldassano
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 8.  How to optimize knowledge construction in the brain.

Authors:  Marlieke Tina Renée van Kesteren; Martijn Meeter
Journal:  NPJ Sci Learn       Date:  2020-05-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.