CONTEXT: Reactive estrogen species cause genotoxicity and interfere with docetaxel-mediated tubulin polymerization resulting in shortened survival in men with castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that polymorphisms in estrogen synthesis and estrogen targets (i.e., CYP19 and ERα) would be linked to interindividual variation in CRPC risk, docetaxel response, and overall survival in men with CRPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with CRPC (n=115) treated with docetaxel, single-agent thalidomide (n=42), or healthy controls (n=289) were genotyped for the CYP19 R264C (rs700519) and the ERα PvuII T>C (rs2234693) and XbaI A>G (rs9340799) polymorphisms. RESULTS: Patients carrying two copies of ERα polymorphisms had shorter progression-free survival on docetaxel than other patients (median survival difference ≥ 3.1 months; P ≤ 0.036). When the analysis was limited to nonobese patients, the relationship between the ERα XbaI A>G polymorphism and PFS improved (median survival difference = 3.5 months; P = 0.0078). The CYP19 R264C variant was related to the duration of survival after docetaxel in patients who were >70 years old (median survival difference =10.6 months; P=0.041). Both ERα polymorphisms were also associated with increases in CRPC risk [P ≤ 0.032; double variants vs. wild-type odds ratio ≥ 2.6], and the association with the ERα PvuII T>C also improved in those men who were <70 years old (P = 0.0073; odds ratio = 3.0). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that estrogen-related genetic variation affects docetaxel clinical response and that this relationship is dependent on age and body-type in men with CRPC. Moreover, this study suggests ERα polymorphisms confer risk of developing prostate cancer, especially in men under 70 years of age.
CONTEXT: Reactive estrogen species cause genotoxicity and interfere with docetaxel-mediated tubulin polymerization resulting in shortened survival in men with castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that polymorphisms in estrogen synthesis and estrogen targets (i.e., CYP19 and ERα) would be linked to interindividual variation in CRPC risk, docetaxel response, and overall survival in men with CRPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patients with CRPC (n=115) treated with docetaxel, single-agent thalidomide (n=42), or healthy controls (n=289) were genotyped for the CYP19 R264C (rs700519) and the ERα PvuII T>C (rs2234693) and XbaI A>G (rs9340799) polymorphisms. RESULTS:Patients carrying two copies of ERα polymorphisms had shorter progression-free survival on docetaxel than other patients (median survival difference ≥ 3.1 months; P ≤ 0.036). When the analysis was limited to nonobese patients, the relationship between the ERα XbaI A>G polymorphism and PFS improved (median survival difference = 3.5 months; P = 0.0078). The CYP19 R264C variant was related to the duration of survival after docetaxel in patients who were >70 years old (median survival difference =10.6 months; P=0.041). Both ERα polymorphisms were also associated with increases in CRPC risk [P ≤ 0.032; double variants vs. wild-type odds ratio ≥ 2.6], and the association with the ERα PvuII T>C also improved in those men who were <70 years old (P = 0.0073; odds ratio = 3.0). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that estrogen-related genetic variation affects docetaxel clinical response and that this relationship is dependent on age and body-type in men with CRPC. Moreover, this study suggests ERα polymorphisms confer risk of developing prostate cancer, especially in men under 70 years of age.
Authors: William D Figg; Haiqing Li; Tristan Sissung; Avi Retter; Shenhong Wu; James L Gulley; Phil Arlen; John J Wright; Howard Parnes; Kathy Fedenko; Lea Latham; Seth M Steinberg; Elizabeth Jones; Clara Chen; William Dahut Journal: BJU Int Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Tristan M Sissung; Romano Danesi; Douglas K Price; Seth M Steinberg; Ronald de Wit; Muhammad Zahid; Nilesh Gaikwad; Ercole Cavalieri; William L Dahut; Dan L Sackett; William D Figg; Alex Sparreboom Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2008-01-09 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Julie M Cunningham; Scott J Hebbring; Shannon K McDonnell; Mine S Cicek; G Bryce Christensen; Liang Wang; Steven J Jacobsen; James R Cerhan; Michael L Blute; Daniel J Schaid; Stephen N Thibodeau Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Yen-Ling Low; James I Taylor; Philip B Grace; Angela A Mulligan; Ailsa A Welch; Serena Scollen; Alison M Dunning; Robert N Luben; Kay-Tee Khaw; Nick E Day; Nick J Wareham; Sheila A Bingham Journal: Nutr Cancer Date: 2006 Impact factor: 2.900
Authors: Jana Jurečeková; Eva Babušíková; Monika Kmeťová; Ján Kliment; Dušan Dobrota Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Lisa Y Cho; Jae Jeong Yang; Kwang-Pil Ko; Seung Hyun Ma; Aesun Shin; Bo Youl Choi; Dong Soo Han; Kyu Sang Song; Yong Sung Kim; Soung-Hoon Chang; Hai-Rim Shin; Daehee Kang; Keun-Young Yoo; Sue K Park Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-10-23 Impact factor: 3.240