BACKGROUND: The course of major depressive disorder is often characterized by progressing chronicity, but whether this applies to the course of self-reported psychological distress remains unclear. We examined whether the risk of self-reported psychological distress becomes progressively higher the longer the history of distress and whether prolonged history of distress modifies associations between risk markers and future distress. METHODS: Participants were British civil servants from the prospective Whitehall II cohort study (n=7934; 31.5% women, mean age 44.5 years at baseline) followed from 1985 to 2006 with repeat data collected in 7 study phases. Psychological distress was assessed with the 30-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ). Sex, socioeconomic status, marital status, ethnicity, physical activity, alcohol consumption, smoking, and obesity were assessed as risk markers. RESULTS: Recurrent history of psychological distress was associated with a progressively increasing risk of future distress in a dose-response manner. Common risk markers, such as low socioeconomic status, non-White ethnicity, being single, and alcohol abstinence, were stronger predictors of subsequent distress in participants with a longer history of psychological distress. Sex differences in psychological distress attenuated with prolonged distress history. LIMITATIONS: The participants were already adults in the beginning of the study, so we could not assess the progressive chronicity of psychological distress from adolescence onwards. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that self-reported psychological distress becomes more persistent over time and that a longer prior exposure to psychological distress increases sensitivity to the stressful effects of certain risk markers.
BACKGROUND: The course of major depressive disorder is often characterized by progressing chronicity, but whether this applies to the course of self-reported psychological distress remains unclear. We examined whether the risk of self-reported psychological distress becomes progressively higher the longer the history of distress and whether prolonged history of distress modifies associations between risk markers and future distress. METHODS: Participants were British civil servants from the prospective Whitehall II cohort study (n=7934; 31.5% women, mean age 44.5 years at baseline) followed from 1985 to 2006 with repeat data collected in 7 study phases. Psychological distress was assessed with the 30-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ). Sex, socioeconomic status, marital status, ethnicity, physical activity, alcohol consumption, smoking, and obesity were assessed as risk markers. RESULTS: Recurrent history of psychological distress was associated with a progressively increasing risk of future distress in a dose-response manner. Common risk markers, such as low socioeconomic status, non-White ethnicity, being single, and alcohol abstinence, were stronger predictors of subsequent distress in participants with a longer history of psychological distress. Sex differences in psychological distress attenuated with prolonged distress history. LIMITATIONS: The participants were already adults in the beginning of the study, so we could not assess the progressive chronicity of psychological distress from adolescence onwards. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that self-reported psychological distress becomes more persistent over time and that a longer prior exposure to psychological distress increases sensitivity to the stressful effects of certain risk markers.
Authors: D A Solomon; M B Keller; A C Leon; T I Mueller; P W Lavori; M T Shea; W Coryell; M Warshaw; C Turvey; J D Maser; J Endicott Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Marko Elovainio; Jussi Vahtera; Jaana Pentti; Christian Hakulinen; Laura Pulkki-Råback; Jari Lipsanen; Marianna Virtanen; Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen; Mika Kivimäki; Mika Kähönen; Jorma Viikari; Terho Lehtimäki; Olli Raitakari Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Marianna Virtanen; Jane E Ferrie; G David Batty; Marko Elovainio; Markus Jokela; Jussi Vahtera; Archana Singh-Manoux; Mika Kivimäki Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2014-04-12 Impact factor: 4.105