Literature DB >> 12462855

The prevalence, clinical relevance, and public health significance of subthreshold depressions.

Lewis L Judd1, Pamela J Schettler, Hagop S Akiskal.   

Abstract

Scientific evidence has accumulated during the last 15 years establishing that SD symptoms have a high prevalence in the general population and in clinically depressed patient cohorts studied cross-sectionally or followed longitudinally. The clinical relevance and public health importance of SD symptoms were confirmed when various investigators, including the authors' group at University of California, San Diego, found that SD symptoms are associated with a significant and pervasive impairment of psychosocial function when compared to no depressive symptoms. There is strong evidence that all levels of depressive symptom severity of unipolar MDD are associated with significant psychosocial impairment, which increases significantly and linearly with each increment in level of symptom severity. It is only when MDD patients are completely symptom free that psychosocial function returns to good or very good levels. The disability associated with depression is state dependent, and disability returns to good or normal levels only when all of the depressed patients' symptoms abate, because disability is present when even a few symptoms (i.e., SD symptoms) are detected. There is strong evidence during the long-term course of illness that major, minor, dysthymic, and subsyndromal symptoms wax and wane within the same patient and that these symptomatic periods are interspersed in the overall course with times when patients are remitted and symptom free. The modal longitudinal symptom status of MDD patients involves primarily subthreshold depressive symptoms, which are much more common than symptoms at the syndromal MDE level. The longitudinal systematic examination of the clinical relevance and high prevalence of SD symptoms helped establish the fact that the long-term symptomatic expression of MDD is dimensional, not categorical, in nature. Abatement of SD symptoms is of fundamental importance in defining full remission or recovery of MDEs. Ongoing residual SD symptoms during the recovery periods after an MDE are associated with psychosocial disability, more rapid MDE relapse, and a more severe chronic future course of illness, all of which indicate that when residual SD symptoms are present the MDE has not fully remitted and the disease is still active. When all depressive symptoms of an MDE abate for a minimum of 8 weeks, then full remission has been achieved. MDE remission defined in this way is associated with significant delay or even prevention of future episode relapse and a less severe, relapsing, and chronic future course. The authors submit that the research reviewed in this article heralds a new paradigm in understanding the progression of clinical depression through various overlapping stages of severity, which begin at the seemingly "subclinical" level of depressive symptoms. This conceptualization in turn dictates a public health approach, which emphasizes that treatment of MDD even at the deceptively mild levels of symptoms should be initiated or maintained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12462855     DOI: 10.1016/s0193-953x(02)00026-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Clin North Am        ISSN: 0193-953X


  54 in total

1.  Changes in mental well-being in the transition to late life: findings from MIDUS I and II.

Authors:  Mark Snowden; Satvinder S Dhingra; Corey L M Keyes; Lynda A Anderson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Quality of life and subthreshold affective symptoms.

Authors:  Arianna Goracci; Mirko Martinucci; Umberto Scalcione; Andrea Fagiolini; Paolo Castrogiovanni
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  How to screen for depression and emotional problems in patients with diabetes: comparison of screening characteristics of depression questionnaires, measurement of diabetes-specific emotional problems and standard clinical assessment.

Authors:  N Hermanns; B Kulzer; M Krichbaum; T Kubiak; T Haak
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 4.  Depression in older adults.

Authors:  Amy Fiske; Julie Loebach Wetherell; Margaret Gatz
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 18.561

5.  Association of subsyndromal and depressive symptoms with inflammatory markers among different ethnic groups: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA).

Authors:  Álvaro Camacho; Britta Larsen; Robyn L McClelland; Cindy Morgan; Michael H Criqui; Mary Cushman; Matthew A Allison
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 4.839

Review 6.  Depressive symptoms and their social contexts: a qualitative systematic literature review of contextual interventions.

Authors:  Laura Gottlieb; Howard Waitzkin; Jeanne Miranda
Journal:  Int J Soc Psychiatry       Date:  2010-03-30

7.  Identification of distinct depressive symptom trajectories in women following surgery for breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura B Dunn; Bruce A Cooper; John Neuhaus; Claudia West; Steven Paul; Bradley Aouizerat; Gary Abrams; Janet Edrington; Debby Hamolsky; Christine Miaskowski
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  Late preterm birth, maternal depression, and risk of preschool psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Cynthia E Rogers; Shannon N Lenze; Joan L Luby
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 8.829

9.  The Upper Bavarian longitudinal community study 1975-2004. 2. Long-term course and outcome of depression. A controlled study.

Authors:  Manfred M Fichter; Gabriele Kohlboeck; Norbert Quadflieg
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 5.270

10.  Long-term follow-up of adolescent depression. A population-based study.

Authors:  Hannes Bohman; Ulf Jonsson; Aivar Päären; Anne-Liis Von Knorring; Gunilla Olsson; Lars Von Knorring
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.384

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.