| Literature DB >> 21106073 |
Dongmei Liu1, Maureen A Sartor, Gustavo A Nader, Laurie Gutmann, Mary K Treutelaar, Emidio E Pistilli, Heidi B Iglayreger, Charles F Burant, Eric P Hoffman, Paul M Gordon.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The molecular mechanisms underlying the sex differences in human muscle morphology and function remain to be elucidated. The sex differences in the skeletal muscle transcriptome in both the resting state and following anabolic stimuli, such as resistance exercise (RE), might provide insight to the contributors of sexual dimorphism of muscle phenotypes. We used microarrays to profile the transcriptome of the biceps brachii of young men and women who underwent an acute unilateral RE session following 12 weeks of progressive training. Bilateral muscle biopsies were obtained either at an early (4 h post-exercise) or late recovery (24 h post-exercise) time point. Muscle transcription profiles were compared in the resting state between men (n = 6) and women (n = 8), and in response to acute RE in trained exercised vs. untrained non-exercised control muscle for each sex and time point separately (4 h post-exercise, n = 3 males, n = 4 females; 24 h post-exercise, n = 3 males, n = 4 females). A logistic regression-based method (LRpath), following Bayesian moderated t-statistic (IMBT), was used to test gene functional groups and biological pathways enriched with differentially expressed genes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21106073 PMCID: PMC3091777 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-659
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Physical characteristics of subjects.
| Variables | Males (n = 8) | Females (n = 8) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yrs) | 24.7 ± 0.8 | 22.7 ± 0.8 | ns |
| Weight (kg) | 76.9 ± 5.2 | 60.0 ± 5.2 | 0.02 |
| Height (cm) | 177.8 ± 3.3 | 156.2 ± 3.3 | < 0.0001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.2 ± 1.7 | 23.7 ± 1.7 | ns |
| 1RM Trained Arm (kg) | 16.7 ± 0.8 | 10.4 ± 0.8 | < 0.0001 |
| 1RM Control Arm (kg) | 12.6 ± 0.5 | 6.5 ± 0.5 | < 0.0001 |
| ISO Trained Arm (kg) | 61.5 ± 3.4 | 29.2 ± 3.4 | < 0.0001 |
| ISO Control Arm (kg) | 55.4 ± 2.9 | 25.3 ± 2.9 | < 0.0001 |
| CSA Trained Arm (cm2) | 6949.3 ± 595.2 | 5837.1 ± 595.2 | ns |
| CSA Control Arm (cm2) | 6314.8 ± 553.3 | 5544 ± 553.3 | ns |
| VOL Trained Arm (cm3) | 642757.5 ± 53086.4 | 541118.8 ± 53086.4 | ns |
| VOL Control Arm (cm3) | 584923.6 ± 50638.3 | 516896.5 ± 50638.3 | ns |
| Δ1RM relative to control | 0.42 (0.29) | 0.55 (0.50) | 0.03 |
| Δ ISO relative to control | 0.10 (0.20) | 0.13 (0.07) | ns |
| Δ CSA relative to control | 0.08 (0.05) | 0.05 (0.12) | 0.08 |
| Δ VOL relative to control | 0.10 (0.09) | 0.07 (0.10) | ns |
Note: Anthropometric and muscle phenotypic measurements are presented as mean ± SEM and sex differences were tested by t-test.
Δ relative to control, relative improvement induced by RE training, calculated as (trained-control)/control; the numbers are median (interquartile range) and sex differences were tested by Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test.
1RM: 1 repetition maximum; ISO: Isometric muscle strength; CSA: Arm whole muscle cross-sectional area measured by MRI; VOL: Arm whole muscle volume.
Figure 1Clustered GO terms and KEGG pathways significantly enriched for differentially expressed genes in five comparisons. In total, 318 GO and KEGG pathways with FDR < 0.01 were included in the figure. Each column represents the experimental condition as indicated on the map. Each row represents one GO term/KEGG pathway. These are summarized for each main cluster. Baseline male vs. female (M/F): GO/KEGG significantly enriched for differentially expressed genes in male vs. female muscle in the resting state: Red color indicates strength of enrichment with higher expressed genes in males (or lower expression in females); green indicates enrichment with lower expressed genes in males (or higher expression in females). Male 4 h, Male 24 h, Female 4 h and Female 24 h: GO/KEGG significantly enriched for RE-induced up-and down-regulated genes in male muscle at 4 h (Male 4 h) and 24 h post exercise (Male 24 h), in female muscle at 4 h (female 4 h) and 24 h post exercise (Female 24 h): Red color indicates strength of RE-induced up-regulation and green indicates down-regulation. The -log10(p-value) of enrichment was used as the value for clustering.
Figure 2Correlation between microarray and qRT-PCR on differential expression of ten selected genes. The blue diamonds represent each gene under four sex and time specific conditions. Spearman's Rho test: Rho = 0.81, p < 0.0001, n = 40.
Figure 3Sex specific regulation of muscle gene transcription induced by resistance exercise. a. Repression of negative regulators of mTOR signaling in male muscle. b. Up-regulation of TGF-beta signaling in female muscle. Y axis represents fold changes (log2): Positive values indicate up-regulation post exercise in exercised vs. rested muscle, and negative values indicate down-regulation. * Significantly different from the rested muscle (p < 0.005); # trend towards a differential expression in exercised vs. rested muscle (p < 0.05).