Literature DB >> 11078093

Effects of age, gender, and myostatin genotype on the hypertrophic response to heavy resistance strength training.

F M Ivey1, S M Roth, R E Ferrell, B L Tracy, J T Lemmer, D E Hurlbut, G F Martel, E L Siegel, J L Fozard, E Jeffrey Metter, J L Fleg, B F Hurley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because of the scarcity of data available from direct comparisons of age and gender groups using the same relative training stimulus, it is unknown whether older individuals can increase their muscle mass as much as young individuals and whether women can increase as much as men in response to strength training (ST). In addition, little is known about whether the hypertrophic response to ST is affected by myostatin genotype, a candidate gene for muscle hypertrophy.
METHODS: Eleven young men (25 +/- 3 years, range 21-29 years), 11 young women (26 +/- 2 years, range 23-28 years), 12 older men (69 +/- 3 years, range 65-75 years), and 11 older women (68 +/- 2 years, range 65-73 years) had bilateral quadriceps muscle volume measurements performed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before and after ST and detraining. Training consisted of knee extension exercises of the dominant leg three times per week for 9 weeks. The contralateral limb was left untrained throughout the ST program. Following the unilateral training period, the subjects underwent 31 weeks of detraining during which no regular exercise was performed. Myostatin genotype was determined in a subgroup of 32 subjects, of which five female subjects were carriers of a myostatin gene variant.
RESULTS: A significantly greater absolute increase in muscle volume was observed in men than in women (204 +/- 20 vs 101 +/- 13 cm3, p < .01), but there was no significant difference in muscle volume response to ST between young and older individuals. The gender effect remained after adjusting for baseline muscle volume. In addition, there was a significantly greater loss of absolute muscle volume after 31 weeks of detraining in men than in women (151 +/- 13 vs 88 +/- 7 cm3, p < .05), but no significant difference between young and older individuals. Myostatin genotype did not explain the hypertrophic response to ST when all 32 subjects were assessed. However, when only women were analyzed, those with the less common myostatin allele exhibited a 68% larger increase in muscle volume in response to ST (p = .056).
CONCLUSIONS: Aging does not affect the muscle mass response to either ST or detraining, whereas gender does, as men increased their muscle volume about twice as much in response to ST as did women and experienced larger losses in response to detraining than women. Young men were the only group that maintained muscle volume adaptation after 31 weeks of detraining. Although myostatin genotype may not explain the observed gender difference in the hypertrophic response to ST, a role for myostatin genotype may be indicated in this regard for women, but future studies are needed with larger subject numbers in each genotype group to confirm this observation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11078093     DOI: 10.1093/gerona/55.11.m641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci        ISSN: 1079-5006            Impact factor:   6.053


  62 in total

Review 1.  New fundamental resistance exercise determinants of molecular and cellular muscle adaptations.

Authors:  Marco Toigo; Urs Boutellier
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  The influence of frequency, intensity, volume and mode of strength training on whole muscle cross-sectional area in humans.

Authors:  Mathias Wernbom; Jesper Augustsson; Roland Thomeé
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Genes, environment and sport performance: why the nature-nurture dualism is no longer relevant.

Authors:  Keith Davids; Joseph Baker
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Monitor of the myostatin autocrine action during differentiation of embryonic chicken myoblasts into myotubes: effect of IGF-I.

Authors:  Masatoshi Kurokawa; Fuminori Sato; Shinya Aramaki; Tomoki Soh; Nobuhiko Yamauchi; Masa-aki Hattori
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2009-05-24       Impact factor: 3.396

5.  Short-term strength training improves muscle quality and functional capacity of elderly women.

Authors:  Ronei Silveira Pinto; Cleiton Silva Correa; Regis Radaelli; Eduardo Lusa Cadore; Lee E Brown; Martim Bottaro
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2013-07-24

6.  Resistance training induced increase in muscle fiber size in young and older men.

Authors:  A A Mero; J J Hulmi; H Salmijärvi; M Katajavuori; M Haverinen; J Holviala; T Ridanpää; K Häkkinen; V Kovanen; J P Ahtiainen; H Selänne
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  Validated treatments and therapeutic perspectives regarding physical activities.

Authors:  Y Rolland; F Pillard
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.075

8.  Influence of promoter region variants of insulin-like growth factor pathway genes on the strength-training response of muscle phenotypes in older adults.

Authors:  Brian D Hand; Matthew C Kostek; Robert E Ferrell; Matthew J Delmonico; Larry W Douglass; Stephen M Roth; James M Hagberg; Ben F Hurley
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2007-08-30

9.  Exploration of myostatin polymorphisms and the angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion genotype in responses of human muscle to strength training.

Authors:  Martine A I Thomis; Wim Huygens; Sofie Heuninckx; Monique Chagnon; Hermine H M Maes; Albrecht L Claessens; Robert Vlietinck; Claude Bouchard; Gaston P Beunen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-04-09       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Influence of age, sex, and strength training on human muscle gene expression determined by microarray.

Authors:  Stephen M Roth; Robert E Ferrell; David G Peters; E Jeffrey Metter; Ben F Hurley; Marc A Rogers
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 3.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.