Literature DB >> 21106016

Diagnosis of abnormal diaphragm motion after cardiothoracic surgery: ultrasound performed by a cardiac intensivist vs. fluoroscopy.

Joan Sanchez de Toledo1, Ricardo Munoz, Douglas Landsittel, Dana Shiderly, Masahiro Yoshida, Rukmini Komarlu, Peter Wearden, Victor O Morell, Constantinos Chrysostomou.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Abnormal diaphragmatic motion secondary to phrenic nerve injury is not uncommon after pediatric cardiothoracic surgery. Fluoroscopy is the most frequent method of diagnosis but it carries risks associated with transportation of critically ill children and exposure to ionizing radiation. Ultrasonography, a reliable diagnostic method in adults, eliminates both concerns. Since most cardiac intensivists are trained in echocardiography, we tested the hypothesis that chest ultrasound performed by a cardiac intensivist is faster than fluoroscopy, and is highly accurate in predicting fluoroscopy results, therefore serving as an equally useful diagnostic test.
DESIGN: Prospective study in consecutive pediatric patients with suspected abnormal diaphragmatic motion after cardiothoracic surgery. All patients underwent fluoroscopy and ultrasound study of the diaphragm. Ultrasound was performed by a pediatric cardiac intensivist and a trainee. Kappa statistic was calculated to assess concordance between both ultrasound readings. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were calculated to assess accuracy of each ultrasound test in predicting fluoroscopy results.
RESULTS: Twenty-five patients with median age 3 months (12 days-11 years) and median weight of 3.8 kg (2.5-29 kg) were included. The ultrasound diagnosis of the cardiac intensivist was perfectly accurate (100% sensitivity, specificity, and PPV and NPV) in predicting fluoroscopy results. The ultrasound performed by the trainee achieved 85.7% sensitivity, 94.4% NPV, and 100% specificity relative to fluoroscopy. The interoperator reliability of chest ultrasound was 0.89 (95% confidence interval 0.69-1). Delay between clinical suspicion and the diagnostic tests was 15 minutes (5 minutes-2.5 hours) for ultrasound and 17 hours (60 minutes-82 hours) for fluoroscopy (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Chest ultrasound performed by cardiac intensivists allows for an early and accurate diagnosis of abnormal diaphragmatic motion, as evidenced by their ability to predict fluoroscopy findings in pediatric cardiothoracic patients. Training in ultrasound-guided assessment of diaphragmatic motion should be reinforced during pediatric cardiac intensive care fellowship.
© 2010 Copyright the Authors. Congenital Heart Disease © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21106016     DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2010.00431.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis        ISSN: 1747-079X            Impact factor:   2.007


  12 in total

1.  Variability in diaphragm motion during normal breathing, assessed with B-mode ultrasound.

Authors:  Caitlin J Harper; Leili Shahgholi; Kathryn Cieslak; Nathan J Hellyer; Jeffrey A Strommen; Andrea J Boon
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.751

2.  Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound in Detecting Causes of Pediatric Chest X-Ray Opacity.

Authors:  Ahmadreza Lameh; Seyed Javad Seyedi; Donia Farrokh; Somayehsadat Lavasani; Seyed Ali Alamdaran
Journal:  Turk Thorac J       Date:  2019-04-09

3.  Intrarater Reliability of Diaphragm Excursion and Resting Thickness Using Ultrasound Imaging in Subjects With Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Maryam Ziaeifar; Shohreh Noorizadeh Dehkordi; Hamid Reza Haghighatkhah; Javad Sarrafzadeh; Amir Masoud Arab; Alieh Zendehdel Jadehkenari
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2022-04-21

Review 4.  Neuromuscular ultrasound for evaluation of the diaphragm.

Authors:  Aarti Sarwal; Francis O Walker; Michael S Cartwright
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 5.  Assessment of diaphragmatic dysfunction in the critically ill patient with ultrasound: a systematic review.

Authors:  Massimo Zambon; Massimiliano Greco; Speranza Bocchino; Luca Cabrini; Paolo Federico Beccaria; Alberto Zangrillo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Outcome analysis of a conservative approach to diaphragmatic paralysis following congenital cardiac surgery in neonates and infants: a bicentric retrospective study.

Authors:  Sophie Denamur; Alexis Chenouard; Bruno Lefort; Olivier Baron; Paul Neville; Alban Baruteau; Nicolas Joram; Julie Chantreuil; Pierre Bourgoin
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-10-04

7.  Risk Factors for post-Cardiac Surgery Diaphragmatic Paralysis in Children with Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Parvin Akbariasbagh; Mohammad Reza Mirzaghayan; Naseredin Akbariasbagh; Mamak Shariat; Bita Ebrahim
Journal:  J Tehran Heart Cent       Date:  2015-07-03

8.  Can Diaphragm Dysfunction Be Reliably Evaluated with Pocket-Sized Ultrasound Devices in Intensive Care Unit?

Authors:  Gul Gursel; Kamil Inci; Zenfira Alasgarova
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2018-04-01

Review 9.  Mechanical birth-related trauma to the neonate: An imaging perspective.

Authors:  Apeksha Chaturvedi; Abhishek Chaturvedi; A Luana Stanescu; Johan G Blickman; Steven P Meyers
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2018-01-22

10.  Ultrasonographic postoperative evaluation of diaphragm function of patients with congenital heart defects.

Authors:  Erkut Öztürk; İbrahim Cansaran Tanıdır; Okan Yıldız; Bekir Yükçü; Servet Ergün; Sertaç Haydın; Alper Güzeltaş
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 0.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.