Massimo Zambon1, Massimiliano Greco2, Speranza Bocchino2, Luca Cabrini2, Paolo Federico Beccaria2, Alberto Zangrillo2,3. 1. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, ASST Melegnano-Martesana, Presidio di Cernusco sul Naviglio, Via Uboldo 21, 20063, Cernusco sul Naviglio, MI, Italy. massimo.zambon@asst-melegnano-martesana.it. 2. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy. 3. Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Diaphragmatic dysfunction (DD) has a high incidence in critically ill patients and is an under-recognized cause of respiratory failure and prolonged weaning from mechanical ventilation. Among different methods to assess diaphragmatic function, diaphragm ultrasonography (DU) is noninvasive, rapid, and easy to perform at the bedside. We systematically reviewed the current literature assessing the usefulness and accuracy of DU in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. METHODS: Pubmed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar Databases were searched for pertinent studies. We included all original, peer-reviewed studies about the use of DU in ICU patients. RESULTS: Twenty studies including 875 patients were included in the final analysis. DU was performed with different techniques to measure diaphragmatic inspiratory excursion, thickness of diaphragm (Tdi), and thickening fraction (TF). DU is feasible, highly reproducible, and allows one to detect diaphragmatic dysfunction in critically ill patients. During weaning from mechanical ventilation and spontaneous breathing trials, both diaphragmatic excursion and diaphragmatic thickening measurements have been used to predict extubation success or failure. Optimal cutoffs ranged from 10 to 14 mm for excursion and 30-36 % for thickening fraction. During assisted mechanical ventilation, diaphragmatic thickening has been found to be an accurate index of respiratory muscles workload. Observational studies suggest DU as a reliable method to assess diaphragm atrophy in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: Current literature suggests that DU could be a useful and accurate tool to detect diaphragmatic dysfunction in critically ill patients, to predict extubation success or failure, to monitor respiratory workload, and to assess atrophy in patients who are mechanically ventilated.
PURPOSE:Diaphragmatic dysfunction (DD) has a high incidence in critically illpatients and is an under-recognized cause of respiratory failure and prolonged weaning from mechanical ventilation. Among different methods to assess diaphragmatic function, diaphragm ultrasonography (DU) is noninvasive, rapid, and easy to perform at the bedside. We systematically reviewed the current literature assessing the usefulness and accuracy of DU in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. METHODS: Pubmed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar Databases were searched for pertinent studies. We included all original, peer-reviewed studies about the use of DU in ICU patients. RESULTS: Twenty studies including 875 patients were included in the final analysis. DU was performed with different techniques to measure diaphragmatic inspiratory excursion, thickness of diaphragm (Tdi), and thickening fraction (TF). DU is feasible, highly reproducible, and allows one to detect diaphragmatic dysfunction in critically illpatients. During weaning from mechanical ventilation and spontaneous breathing trials, both diaphragmatic excursion and diaphragmatic thickening measurements have been used to predict extubation success or failure. Optimal cutoffs ranged from 10 to 14 mm for excursion and 30-36 % for thickening fraction. During assisted mechanical ventilation, diaphragmatic thickening has been found to be an accurate index of respiratory muscles workload. Observational studies suggest DU as a reliable method to assess diaphragm atrophy in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: Current literature suggests that DU could be a useful and accurate tool to detect diaphragmatic dysfunction in critically illpatients, to predict extubation success or failure, to monitor respiratory workload, and to assess atrophy in patients who are mechanically ventilated.
Authors: Xavier Valette; Amélie Seguin; Cédric Daubin; Jennifer Brunet; Bertrand Sauneuf; Nicolas Terzi; Damien du Cheyron Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2015-01-20 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Ewan C Goligher; Eddy Fan; Margaret S Herridge; Alistair Murray; Stefannie Vorona; Debbie Brace; Nuttapol Rittayamai; Ashley Lanys; George Tomlinson; Jeffrey M Singh; Steffen-Sebastian Bolz; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Brian P Kavanagh; Laurent J Brochard; Niall D Ferguson Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2015-11-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Alexandre Demoule; Boris Jung; Hélène Prodanovic; Nicolas Molinari; Gerald Chanques; Catherine Coirault; Stefan Matecki; Alexandre Duguet; Thomas Similowski; Samir Jaber Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2013-07-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Nicola Latronico; Margaret Herridge; Ramona O Hopkins; Derek Angus; Nicholas Hart; Greet Hermans; Theodore Iwashyna; Yaseen Arabi; Giuseppe Citerio; E. Wesley Ely; Jesse Hall; Sangeeta Mehta; Kathleen Puntillo; Johannes Van den Hoeven; Hannah Wunsch; Deborah Cook; Claudia Dos Santos; Gordon Rubenfeld; Jean-Louis Vincent; Greet Van den Berghe; Elie Azoulay; Dale M Needham Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-03-13 Impact factor: 17.440