Angus W Turner1, Will J Mulholland, Hugh R Taylor. 1. Indigenous Eye Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population Health, University of Melbourne McKinsey and Co., Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. angus.turner@gmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This paper aims to describe models for service integration between ophthalmology and optometry when conducting outreach eye services. The effect of good coordination on clinical activity and cost-effectiveness is examined. DESIGN: Cross-sectional case study based on remote outreach ophthalmology services in Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Key stake-holders from eye services in nine outreach regions participated in the study. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted to perform a qualitative assessment of outreach eye services' levels of coordination. Records of clinical activity were used to statistically compare the effects of good coordination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical activity (surgery and clinic consultation rates), waiting times and costs per attendance. Surgical case rate being the proportion of surgery that results from a clinic. RESULTS: Service integration between optometry and ophthalmology resulted in an increased surgical case rate for ophthalmology clinics (R(2) = 0.57). There were trends towards increased clinical activity and reduced waiting times, and costs/attendance were stable. CONCLUSIONS: Coordination of eye services with better integration of ophthalmology and optometry roles may improve efficiency of services for patients. Coordination of eye services has multiple facets including facilitating engagement with the local community, eye professions and health facilities. The varied roles of eye health coordination require further definition and appropriate funding.
BACKGROUND: This paper aims to describe models for service integration between ophthalmology and optometry when conducting outreach eye services. The effect of good coordination on clinical activity and cost-effectiveness is examined. DESIGN: Cross-sectional case study based on remote outreach ophthalmology services in Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Key stake-holders from eye services in nine outreach regions participated in the study. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted to perform a qualitative assessment of outreach eye services' levels of coordination. Records of clinical activity were used to statistically compare the effects of good coordination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical activity (surgery and clinic consultation rates), waiting times and costs per attendance. Surgical case rate being the proportion of surgery that results from a clinic. RESULTS: Service integration between optometry and ophthalmology resulted in an increased surgical case rate for ophthalmology clinics (R(2) = 0.57). There were trends towards increased clinical activity and reduced waiting times, and costs/attendance were stable. CONCLUSIONS: Coordination of eye services with better integration of ophthalmology and optometry roles may improve efficiency of services for patients. Coordination of eye services has multiple facets including facilitating engagement with the local community, eye professions and health facilities. The varied roles of eye health coordination require further definition and appropriate funding.
Authors: Helen Burn; Lisa Hamm; Joanna Black; Anthea Burnett; Matire Harwood; Matthew J Burton; Jennifer R Evans; Jacqueline Ramke Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2021-03
Authors: Maíra Catharina Ramos; Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto; Helena Eri Shimizu; Amanda Pereira Gomes de Moraes; Everton Nunes da Silva Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-12-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kehinde Obamiro; Belinda Jessup; Penny Allen; Victoria Baker-Smith; Santosh Khanal; Tony Barnett Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 4.614