Literature DB >> 29372249

Prevalence and Causes of Unilateral Vision Impairment and Unilateral Blindness in Australia: The National Eye Health Survey.

Joshua Foreman1,2, Jing Xie1,2, Stuart Keel1,2, Ghee Soon Ang1,2, Pei Ying Lee1,2, Rupert Bourne3, Jonathan G Crowston1,2, Hugh R Taylor4, Mohamed Dirani1,5.   

Abstract

Importance: This study determines the prevalence of unilateral vision impairment (VI) and unilateral blindness to assist in policy formulation for eye health care services. Objective: To determine the prevalence and causes of unilateral VI and unilateral blindness in Australia. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional population-based survey was conducted from March 2015 to April 2016 at 30 randomly selected sites across all strata of geographic remoteness in Australia. A total of 1738 indigenous Australians 40 years or older and 3098 nonindigenous Australians 50 years or older were included. Main Outcomes and Measures: The prevalence and causes of unilateral vision impairment and blindness, defined as presenting visual acuity worse than 6/12 and 6/60, respectively, in the worse eye, and 6/12 or better in the better eye.
Results: Of the 1738 indigenous Australians, mean (SD) age was 55.0 (10.0) years, and 1024 participants (58.9%) were female. Among the 3098 nonindigenous Australians, mean (SD) age was 66.6 (9.7) years, and 1661 participants (53.6%) were female. The weighted prevalence of unilateral VI in indigenous Australians was 12.5% (95% CI, 11.0%-14.2%) and the prevalence of unilateral blindness was 2.4% (95% CI, 1.7%-3.3%), respectively. In nonindigenous Australians, the prevalence of unilateral VI was 14.6% (95% CI, 13.1%-16.3%) and unilateral blindness was found in 1.4% (95% CI, 1.0%-1.8%). The age-adjusted and sex-adjusted prevalence of unilateral vision loss was higher in indigenous Australians than nonindigenous Australians (VI: 18.7% vs 14.5%; P = .02; blindness: 2.9% vs 1.3%; P = .02). Risk factors for unilateral vision loss included older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.60 for each decade of age for indigenous Australians; 95% CI, 1.39-1.86; OR, 1.65 per decade for nonindigenous Australians; 95% CI, 1.38-1.96), very remote residence (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.01-2.74) and self-reported diabetes (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.12-2.07) for indigenous Australians, and having not undergone an eye examination in the past 2 years for nonindigenous Australians (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.04-2.27). Uncorrected refractive error and cataract were leading causes of unilateral VI in both populations (70%-75%). Corneal pathology (16.7%) and cataract (13.9%) were leading causes of unilateral blindness in indigenous Australians, while amblyopia (18.8%), trauma (16.7%), and age-related macular degeneration (10.4%) were major causes of unilateral blindness in nonindigenous Australians. Conclusions and Relevance: Unilateral vision loss is prevalent in indigenous and nonindigenous Australians; however, most cases are avoidable. As those with unilateral vision loss caused by cataract and posterior segment diseases may be at great risk of progressing to bilateral blindness, national blindness prevention programs may benefit from prioritizing examination and treatment of those with unilateral vision loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29372249      PMCID: PMC5885895          DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.6457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  43 in total

1.  Age-specific prevalence and causes of bilateral and unilateral visual impairment in older Australians: the Blue Mountains Eye Study.

Authors:  J J Wang; S Foran; P Mitchell
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 2.  Does stereopsis matter in humans?

Authors:  A R Fielder; M J Moseley
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Global cost of correcting vision impairment from uncorrected refractive error.

Authors:  T R Fricke; B A Holden; D A Wilson; G Schlenther; K S Naidoo; S Resnikoff; K D Frick
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 4.  Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010.

Authors:  Donatella Pascolini; Silvio Paolo Mariotti
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  The prevalence and causes of vision loss in Indigenous Australians: the National Indigenous Eye Health Survey.

Authors:  Hugh R Taylor; Jing Xie; Sarah Fox; Ross A Dunn; Anna-Lena Arnold; Jill E Keeffe
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 7.738

6.  Diabetic retinopathy study. Report Number 6. Design, methods, and baseline results. Report Number 7. A modification of the Airlie House classification of diabetic retinopathy. Prepared by the Diabetic Retinopathy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  The prevalence and causes of visual impairment in Tehran: the Tehran Eye Study.

Authors:  A Fotouhi; H Hashemi; K Mohammad; K H Jalali
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Prevalence and causes of blindness in the rural population of the Chennai Glaucoma Study.

Authors:  L Vijaya; R George; H Arvind; M Baskaran; P Raju; S V Ramesh; P G Paul; G Kumaramanickavel; C McCarty
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Prevalence of blindness and visual impairment in Nigeria: the National Blindness and Visual Impairment Study.

Authors:  Fatima Kyari; Murthy V S Gudlavalleti; Selvaraj Sivsubramaniam; Clare E Gilbert; Mohammed M Abdull; Gabriel Entekume; Allen Foster
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Effects of cataract type and location on visual function: the Blue Mountains Eye Study.

Authors:  B E Chua; P Mitchell; R G Cumming
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.775

View more
  4 in total

1.  Status of visual impairment among indigenous (Orang Asli) school children in Malaysia.

Authors:  Rokiah Omar; Wan Mohd Hafidz Wan Abdul; Victor Feizal Knight
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 2.  An evidence-based approach to the routine use of optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Angelica Ly; Jack Phu; Paula Katalinic; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  Effect of Cataract Surgery on Frequency of Falls among Older Persons: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Luis Miguel Gutiérrez-Robledo; Miguel Angel Villasís-Keever; Arturo Avila-Avila; Raúl Hernán Medina-Campos; Roberto Carlos Castrejón-Pérez; Carmen García-Peña
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Low levels of refractive blur increase the risk of colour misperception of red train signals.

Authors:  Joanne M Wood; David A Atchison; Alex A Black; Grégoire S Larue
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 3.992

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.