Literature DB >> 2110583

Evaluation of mutagenicity of restorative dental materials using the Ames Salmonella/microsome test.

Y Li1, T W Noblitt, A J Dunipace, G K Stookey.   

Abstract

Compounds of five commercially available dental material kits were examined for mutagenic potential by use of the Ames Salmonella/microsome test. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was used as the solvent for all materials, except MONO-LOK2 Primer and Right-On Activator, which were dissolved in 95% ethanol. The Tenure, Fuji, and Gluma materials were initially screened at 2 mg (solids) or 2 microL (liquids) per plate, without S9 (Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver microsomes), and dose-response studies were conducted for those materials showing potential mutagenicity. The components of three dental kits, MONO-LOK2, Right-On, and Gluma, were further examined, both with and without S9 activation, at doses of 0.2, 4, 20, 100, 500, and 2500 micrograms (nL for liquid components) per plate. The data showed no mutagenic potential for the components of Fuji Glass Ionomer (Type III), Tenure Dentin Bonding System, and MONO-LOK2 kits, or Right-On Paste. However, Gluma 3, a component of the Gluma/Lumifor Bonding System, exhibited mutagenic activity in a dose-response manner. The mutagenicity of Gluma 3 was demonstrated in repeated experiments. Gluma 4 and the resin of the Gluma dental kit, as well as Right-On Activator, caused a slight increase in the number of revertants, and judgment regarding their mutagenicity could not be made conclusively. The results of this study indicate that some commercial dental materials may not have been adequately tested for mutagenicity, and that a reliable test program for evaluation of mutagenicity of dental materials is needed so that their safe use in dental practice can be ensured.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2110583     DOI: 10.1177/00220345900690051301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  3 in total

1.  Detection of mutagenic potential of some glass-ionomer cements through Ames testing.

Authors:  S Stea; M Cervellati; D Cavedagna; L Savarino; E Cenni; A Pizzoferrato; S Stea
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  [Amalgam and pain-a discussion of the amalgam controversy.].

Authors:  H J Staehle
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  Mutagenicity potential (affect) of new atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) material incorporated with Azadirachta indica (Neem) against Salmonella typhimurium.

Authors:  P Divya Kumari; A Veena Shetty; Shahnawaz Khijmatgar; Avidyuti Chowdhury; Edward Lynch; Chitta R Chowdhury
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2018-08-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.