Literature DB >> 15348903

Detection of mutagenic potential of some glass-ionomer cements through Ames testing.

S Stea1, M Cervellati, D Cavedagna, L Savarino, E Cenni, A Pizzoferrato, S Stea1.   

Abstract

The mutagenic potential of three commercially available glass-ionomer cements used in dentistry was examined. The cement components were mixed according to the manufacturers indications and set for two defined times: 1 h or, alternatively, 1 wk. Cements B and C set spontaneously; in the case of cement A, the manufacturer suggests the use of a lamp to trigger also a photopolymerization. Photopolymerization, however, was not used. Ames tests were performed on the dimethyl sulphoxide extracts of cements by using Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538 and TA 102. Cement A showed mutagenicity only against TA 1537 strain, either in the presence or absence of metabolic activation with microsomial fraction S9. The other two cements showed no mutagenic potential. We conclude that glass-ionomer cements are, on the whole, safe materials from the viewpoint of genotoxicity, and hypothesize that the mutagenicity observed in cement A could depend on its polymerization performed without light activation. Copyright 1998 Chapman & Hall

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 15348903     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008815602642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  19 in total

1.  Initial in-vivo evaluation of glass-ionomer cements for use as alveolar bone substitutes.

Authors:  I M Brook; G T Craig; D J Lamb
Journal:  Clin Mater       Date:  1991

Review 2.  Glass-ionomer cement--origins, development and future.

Authors:  A D Wilson
Journal:  Clin Mater       Date:  1991

3.  Biological evaluation of an ionomeric bone cement by osteoblast cell culture methods.

Authors:  U Meyer; D H Szulczewski; R H Barckhaus; M Atkinson; D B Jones
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Genotoxicity of dental materials.

Authors:  J Heil; G Reifferscheid; P Waldmann; G Leyhausen; W Geurtsen
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1996-07-05       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Glass-ionomer cements in orthopaedic surgery: design of laboratory tests.

Authors:  E A Wasson; J W Nicholson
Journal:  Clin Mater       Date:  1991

6.  Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test.

Authors:  D M Maron; B N Ames
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  "Single-step" orthodontic bonding systems: possible mutagenic potential.

Authors:  N G Cross; R F Taylor; L J Nunez
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1983-10

8.  Glass ionomer cement formulations: I. The preparation of novel fluoroaluminosilicate glasses high in fluorine.

Authors:  B E Kent; B G Lewis; A D Wilson
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 6.116

9.  Mutagenicity of endodontic sealers.

Authors:  D Orstavik; J K Hongslo
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Mutagenic potential of root canal sealers: evaluation through Ames testing.

Authors:  S Stea; L Savarino; G Ciapetti; E Cenni; S Stea; F Trotta; G Morozzi; A Pizzoferrato
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1994-03
View more
  1 in total

1.  Effects of glass ionomer cements on bone tissue.

Authors:  P Lucksanasombool; W A J Higgs; R J E D Higgs; M V Swain; C R Howlett
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.896

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.