Literature DB >> 21104278

Will the CO2 fertilization effect in forests be offset by reduced tree longevity?

Harald Bugmann1, Christof Bigler.   

Abstract

Experimental studies suggest that tree growth is stimulated in a greenhouse atmosphere, leading to faster carbon accumulation (i.e., a higher rate of gap filling). However, higher growth may be coupled with reduced longevity, thus leading to faster carbon release (i.e., a higher rate of gap creation). The net effect of these two counteracting processes is not known. We quantify this net effect on aboveground carbon stocks using a novel combination of data sets and modeling. Data on maximum growth rate and maximum longevity of 141 temperate tree species are used to derive a relationship between growth stimulation and changes in longevity. We employ this relationship to modify the respective parameter values of tree species in a forest succession model and study aboveground biomass in a factorial design of growth stimulation × reduced maximum longevity at multiple sites along a climate gradient from the cold to the dry treeline. The results show that (1) any growth stimulation at the tree level leads to a disproportionately small increase of stand biomass due to negative feedback effects, even in the absence of reduced longevity; (2) a reduction of tree longevity tends to offset the growth-related biomass increase; at the most likely value of reduced longevity, the net effect is very close to zero in most multi- and single-species simulations; and (3) when averaging the response across all sites to mimic a "landscape-level" response, the net effect is close to zero. Thus, it is important to consider ecophysiological responses with their linkage to demographic processes in forest trees if one wishes to avoid erroneous inference at the ecosystem level. We conclude that any CO(2) fertilization effect is quite likely to be offset by an associated reduction in the longevity of forest trees, thus strongly reducing the carbon mitigation potential of temperate forests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21104278     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-010-1837-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  15 in total

Review 1.  Forests, carbon and global climate.

Authors:  Yadvinder Malhi; Patrick Meir; Sandra Brown
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Pattern and process in Amazon tree turnover, 1976-2001.

Authors:  O L Phillips; T R Baker; L Arroyo; N Higuchi; T J Killeen; W F Laurance; S L Lewis; J Lloyd; Y Malhi; A Monteagudo; D A Neill; P Núñez Vargas; J N M Silva; J Terborgh; R Vásquez Martínez; M Alexiades; S Almeida; S Brown; J Chave; J A Comiskey; C I Czimczik; A Di Fiore; T Erwin; C Kuebler; S G Laurance; H E M Nascimento; J Olivier; W Palacios; S Patiño; N C A Pitman; C A Quesada; M Saldias; A Torres Lezama; B Vinceti
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Increasing turnover through time in tropical forests.

Authors:  O L Phillips; A H Gentry
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-02-18       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The effect of elevated carbon dioxide and fertilization on primary and secondary metabolites in birch,Betula pendula (Roth).

Authors:  A Lavola; R Julkunen-Tiitto
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2-enriched atmosphere.

Authors:  R Oren; D S Ellsworth; K H Johnsen; N Phillips; B E Ewers; C Maier; K V Schäfer; H McCarthy; G Hendrey; S G McNulty; G G Katul
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-24       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity.

Authors:  Richard J Norby; Evan H Delucia; Birgit Gielen; Carlo Calfapietra; Christian P Giardina; John S King; Joanne Ledford; Heather R McCarthy; David J P Moore; Reinhart Ceulemans; Paolo De Angelis; Adrien C Finzi; David F Karnosky; Mark E Kubiske; Martin Lukac; Kurt S Pregitzer; Giuseppe E Scarascia-Mugnozza; William H Schlesinger; Ram Oren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A dynamical model of environmental effects on allocation to carbon-based secondary compounds in juvenile trees.

Authors:  S Gayler; T E E Grams; W Heller; D Treutter; E Priesack
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 8.  Through enhanced tree dynamics carbon dioxide enrichment may cause tropical forests to lose carbon.

Authors:  Christian Körner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Fine-root production dominates response of a deciduous forest to atmospheric CO2 enrichment.

Authors:  Richard J Norby; Joanne Ledford; Carolyn D Reilly; Nicole E Miller; Elizabeth G O'Neill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Crown plasticity and competition for canopy space: a new spatially implicit model parameterized for 250 North American tree species.

Authors:  Drew W Purves; Jeremy W Lichstein; Stephen W Pacala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  13 in total

1.  The impact of long dry periods on the aboveground biomass in a tropical forests: 20 years of monitoring.

Authors:  Milton Serpa de Meira Junior; José Roberto Rodrigues Pinto; Natália Oliveira Ramos; Eder Pereira Miguel; Ricardo de Oliveira Gaspar; Oliver L Phillips
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2020-05-30

2.  Long-term decline of the Amazon carbon sink.

Authors:  R J W Brienen; O L Phillips; T R Feldpausch; E Gloor; T R Baker; J Lloyd; G Lopez-Gonzalez; A Monteagudo-Mendoza; Y Malhi; S L Lewis; R Vásquez Martinez; M Alexiades; E Álvarez Dávila; P Alvarez-Loayza; A Andrade; L E O C Aragão; A Araujo-Murakami; E J M M Arets; L Arroyo; G A Aymard C; O S Bánki; C Baraloto; J Barroso; D Bonal; R G A Boot; J L C Camargo; C V Castilho; V Chama; K J Chao; J Chave; J A Comiskey; F Cornejo Valverde; L da Costa; E A de Oliveira; A Di Fiore; T L Erwin; S Fauset; M Forsthofer; D R Galbraith; E S Grahame; N Groot; B Hérault; N Higuchi; E N Honorio Coronado; H Keeling; T J Killeen; W F Laurance; S Laurance; J Licona; W E Magnussen; B S Marimon; B H Marimon-Junior; C Mendoza; D A Neill; E M Nogueira; P Núñez; N C Pallqui Camacho; A Parada; G Pardo-Molina; J Peacock; M Peña-Claros; G C Pickavance; N C A Pitman; L Poorter; A Prieto; C A Quesada; F Ramírez; H Ramírez-Angulo; Z Restrepo; A Roopsind; A Rudas; R P Salomão; M Schwarz; N Silva; J E Silva-Espejo; M Silveira; J Stropp; J Talbot; H ter Steege; J Teran-Aguilar; J Terborgh; R Thomas-Caesar; M Toledo; M Torello-Raventos; R K Umetsu; G M F van der Heijden; P van der Hout; I C Guimarães Vieira; S A Vieira; E Vilanova; V A Vos; R J Zagt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Global tree-ring analysis reveals rapid decrease in tropical tree longevity with temperature.

Authors:  Giuliano Maselli Locosselli; Roel J W Brienen; Melina de Souza Leite; Manuel Gloor; Stefan Krottenthaler; Alexandre A de Oliveira; Jonathan Barichivich; Dieter Anhuf; Gregorio Ceccantini; Jochen Schöngart; Marcos Buckeridge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Where does the carbon go? A model-data intercomparison of vegetation carbon allocation and turnover processes at two temperate forest free-air CO2 enrichment sites.

Authors:  Martin G De Kauwe; Belinda E Medlyn; Sönke Zaehle; Anthony P Walker; Michael C Dietze; Ying-Ping Wang; Yiqi Luo; Atul K Jain; Bassil El-Masri; Thomas Hickler; David Wårlind; Ensheng Weng; William J Parton; Peter E Thornton; Shusen Wang; I Colin Prentice; Shinichi Asao; Benjamin Smith; Heather R McCarthy; Colleen M Iversen; Paul J Hanson; Jeffrey M Warren; Ram Oren; Richard J Norby
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 10.151

5.  Carbon uptake by mature Amazon forests has mitigated Amazon nations' carbon emissions.

Authors:  Oliver L Phillips; Roel J W Brienen
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2017-02-15

6.  Among-tree variability and feedback effects result in different growth responses to climate change at the upper treeline in the Swiss Alps.

Authors:  Matthias Jochner; Harald Bugmann; Magdalena Nötzli; Christof Bigler
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Limited capacity of tree growth to mitigate the global greenhouse effect under predicted warming.

Authors:  Ulf Büntgen; Paul J Krusic; Alma Piermattei; David A Coomes; Jan Esper; Vladimir S Myglan; Alexander V Kirdyanov; J Julio Camarero; Alan Crivellaro; Christian Körner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 8.  Tackling unresolved questions in forest ecology: The past and future role of simulation models.

Authors:  Isabelle Maréchaux; Fanny Langerwisch; Andreas Huth; Harald Bugmann; Xavier Morin; Christopher P O Reyer; Rupert Seidl; Alessio Collalti; Mateus Dantas de Paula; Rico Fischer; Martin Gutsch; Manfred J Lexer; Heike Lischke; Anja Rammig; Edna Rödig; Boris Sakschewski; Franziska Taubert; Kirsten Thonicke; Giorgio Vacchiano; Friedrich J Bohn
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.167

9.  Forest stand growth dynamics in Central Europe have accelerated since 1870.

Authors:  Hans Pretzsch; Peter Biber; Gerhard Schütze; Enno Uhl; Thomas Rötzer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Trade-Offs between Growth Rate, Tree Size and Lifespan of Mountain Pine (Pinus montana) in the Swiss National Park.

Authors:  Christof Bigler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.