Literature DB >> 21104231

Guidelines for conducting and reporting economic evaluation of fall prevention strategies.

J C Davis1, M C Robertson, T Comans, P A Scuffham.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Falls in older people result in substantial health burden. Compelling evidence indicates that falls can be prevented. We developed comprehensive guidelines for economic evaluations of fall prevention interventions to facilitate publication of high-quality economic evaluations of the effective strategies and aid decision making.
INTRODUCTION: The importance of economics applied to falls and fall prevention in older people has largely been overlooked. The use of different methodologies to assess the costs and health benefits of the interventions and their comparators and the inconsistent reporting in the studies limits the usefulness of these economic evaluations for decision making. We developed guidelines to encourage and facilitate completion of high-quality economic evaluations of effective fall prevention strategies.
METHODS: We used a generic checklist for economic evaluations as a platform to develop comprehensive guidelines for conducting and reporting economic evaluations of fall prevention strategies. We considered the many challenges involved, particularly in identifying, measuring, and valuing the relevant cost items.
RESULTS: We recommend researchers include cost outcomes and report incremental cost-effectiveness ratios in terms of falls prevented and quality adjusted life years in all clinical trials of fall prevention interventions. Studies should include the following cost categories: (1) implementing the intervention, (2) delivering the comparator group intervention, (3) total health care costs, (4) costs of fall-related health care resource use, and (5) personal and informal carer opportunity costs.
CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides a timely benchmark to promote comparability and consistency for conducting and reporting economic evaluations of fall prevention strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21104231     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-010-1482-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  40 in total

1.  The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36.

Authors:  John Brazier; Jennifer Roberts; Mark Deverill
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Handling missing data in patient-level cost-effectiveness analysis alongside randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  Andrea Manca; Stephen Palmer
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.561

3.  Economic analysis of a community-based falls prevention program.

Authors:  J Beard; D Rowell; D Scott; E van Beurden; L Barnett; K Hughes; B Newman
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 2.427

Review 4.  Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G W Torrance
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

5.  Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community.

Authors:  M E Tinetti; M Speechley; S F Ginter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-12-29       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Risk factors for falls in a community-based prospective study of people 70 years and older.

Authors:  A J Campbell; M J Borrie; G F Spears
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1989-07

7.  Preventing falls among community-dwelling older persons: results from a randomized trial.

Authors:  M C Hornbrook; V J Stevens; D J Wingfield; J F Hollis; M R Greenlick; M G Ory
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1994-02

Review 8.  Measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; D H Feeny; D L Patrick
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community.

Authors:  Lesley D Gillespie; M Clare Robertson; William J Gillespie; Sarah E Lamb; Simon Gates; Robert G Cumming; Brian H Rowe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-04-15

10.  Functional limitations and poor physical performance as independent risk factors for self-reported fractures in older persons.

Authors:  V S Stel; S M F Pluijm; D J H Deeg; J H Smit; L M Bouter; P Lips
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  36 in total

1.  A cost-benefit analysis of three older adult fall prevention interventions.

Authors:  Vilma Carande-Kulis; Judy A Stevens; Curtis S Florence; Bonita L Beattie; Ileana Arias
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2015-01-06

2.  Evaluating the conduct and application of health utility studies: a review of critical appraisal tools and reporting checklists.

Authors:  Michael J Zoratti; A Simon Pickard; Peep F M Stalmeier; Daniel Ollendorf; Andrew Lloyd; Kelvin K W Chan; Don Husereau; John E Brazier; Murray Krahn; Mitchell Levine; Lehana Thabane; Feng Xie
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-04-11

3.  Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.

Authors:  Don Husereau; Michael Drummond; Stavros Petrou; Chris Carswell; David Moher; Dan Greenberg; Federico Augustovski; Andrew H Briggs; Josephine Mauskopf; Elizabeth Loder
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.

Authors:  Don Husereau; Michael Drummond; Stavros Petrou; Chris Carswell; David Moher; Dan Greenberg; Federico Augustovski; Andrew H Briggs; Josephine Mauskopf; Elizabeth Loder
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-06

5.  Cost-effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation and exercise in preventing injurious falls among older home-dwelling women: findings from an RCT.

Authors:  R Patil; P Kolu; J Raitanen; J Valvanne; P Kannus; S Karinkanta; H Sievänen; K Uusi-Rasi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Community falls prevention for people who call an emergency ambulance after a fall: an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Tracey H Sach; Philippa A Logan; Carol A C Coupland; John R F Gladman; Opinder Sahota; Valarie Stoner-Hobbs; Kate Robertson; Vicki Tomlinson; Marie Ward; Anthony J Avery
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 10.668

7.  A comprehensive review of official discount rates in guidelines of health economic evaluations over time: the trends and roots.

Authors:  Elahe Khorasani; Majid Davari; Abbas Kebriaeezadeh; Farshad Fatemi; Ali Akbari Sari; Vida Varahrami
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2022-03-02

8.  Cost-effectiveness of a multifactorial fracture prevention program for elderly people admitted to nursing homes.

Authors:  Dirk Müller; Lisa Borsi; Claudia Stracke; Stephanie Stock; Björn Stollenwerk
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-05-13

9.  Comparison of cost-effectiveness of vitamin D screening with that of universal supplementation in preventing falls in community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  Richard H Lee; Thomas Weber; Cathleen Colón-Emeric
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Cost Effectiveness of Pharmacological Treatments for Asthma: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carlos E Rodriguez-Martinez; Monica P Sossa-Briceño; Jose A Castro-Rodriguez
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.