Literature DB >> 21103888

Feature absence-presence and two theories of lapses of sustained attention.

William S Helton1, Paul N Russell.   

Abstract

We conducted two experiments using search asymmetry to test two theories of sustained attention lapses currently debated in the literature: the mindlessness theory and the resource theory. In the first experiment, participants performed a feature present and a feature absent sustained attention to response task (SART). The mindlessness theory predicts more commission errors in a feature present SART than a feature absent SART, while resource theory predicts the reverse, i.e. more commission errors in a feature absent SART than feature present SART. The latter occurred. In the second study, participants performed a naturalistic scene vigilance task with targets more analogous to a feature present search or more analogous to a feature absent search. The vigilance decrement occurred, with an increase in reaction time to targets over the course of the vigil. The decrement was more pronounced with the targets more analogous to a feature absent search. Overall, the results of both studies support a resource theory of sustained attention lapses, not the mindlessness theory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21103888     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-010-0316-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  30 in total

1.  Effects of cueing and knowledge of results on workload and boredom in sustained attention.

Authors:  E M Hitchcock; W N Dember; J S Warm; B W Moroney; J E See
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.888

2.  Subjective experience and the attentional lapse: task engagement and disengagement during sustained attention.

Authors:  Jonathan Smallwood; John B Davies; Derek Heim; Frances Finnigan; Megan Sudberry; Rory O'Connor; Marc Obonsawin
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2004-12

3.  The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention.

Authors:  D H Weissman; K C Roberts; K M Visscher; M G Woldorff
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-06-11       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Impulsive responding and the sustained attention to response task.

Authors:  William S Helton
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.475

5.  Effects of sensory modality on cerebral blood flow velocity during vigilance.

Authors:  Tyler H Shaw; Joel S Warm; Victor Finomore; Lloyd Tripp; Gerald Matthews; Ernest Weiler; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Relation of cerebral blood flow velocity and level of vigilance in humans.

Authors:  C Schnittger; S Johannes; A Arnavaz; T F Münte
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1997-05-06       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries.

Authors:  A Treisman; S Gormican
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  The detection of a simple visual signal as a function of time of watch.

Authors:  W H Teichner
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 2.888

9.  Effects of warned and unwarned demand transitions on vigilance performance and stress.

Authors:  William S Helton; Tyler Shaw; Joel S Warm; Gerald Matthews; Peter Hancock
Journal:  Anxiety Stress Coping       Date:  2008-04

10.  The briefest of glances: the time course of natural scene understanding.

Authors:  Michelle R Greene; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-04
View more
  14 in total

1.  A new semantic vigilance task: vigilance decrement, workload, and sensitivity to dual-task costs.

Authors:  Samantha L Epling; Paul N Russell; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Practice does not make perfect in a modified sustained attention to response task.

Authors:  James Head; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Free recall and outdoor running: cognitive and physical demand interference.

Authors:  Samantha L Epling; Megan J Blakely; Paul N Russell; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Mobilizing cognition for speeded action: try-harder instructions promote motivated readiness in the constant-foreperiod paradigm.

Authors:  Michael B Steinborn; Robert Langner; Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-09-20

5.  The effects of self-control on cognitive resource allocation during sustained attention: a transcranial Doppler investigation.

Authors:  Alexandra Becker; Arielle R Mandell; June P Tangney; Linda D Chrosniak; Tyler H Shaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Sustaining attention to simple tasks: a meta-analytic review of the neural mechanisms of vigilant attention.

Authors:  Robert Langner; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Neural signatures of vigilance decrements predict behavioural errors before they occur.

Authors:  Alexandra Woolgar; Anina N Rich; Hamid Karimi-Rouzbahani
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 8.  Habituation of reinforcer effectiveness.

Authors:  David R Lloyd; Douglas J Medina; Larry W Hawk; Whitney D Fosco; Jerry B Richards
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-09

9.  Inhibiting the Physiological Stress Effects of a Sustained Attention Task on Shoulder Muscle Activity.

Authors:  Fiona Wixted; Cliona O'Riordan; Leonard O'Sullivan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  EEG and Eye Tracking Demonstrate Vigilance Enhancement with Challenge Integration.

Authors:  Indu P Bodala; Junhua Li; Nitish V Thakor; Hasan Al-Nashash
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.