Literature DB >> 21102358

Variation in the quality of surgical care for uterovaginal prolapse.

Kim F Rhoads1, Eric R Sokol.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pelvic organ prolapse is a common disorder, affecting an estimated 24% of women in the United States, with more than 200,000 surgical procedures performed annually. Current treatment recommendations from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists include pelvic floor reconstruction (or pexy) procedures to correct prolapse, with or without hysterectomy; however, many women are treated by hysterectomy alone.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hospital characteristics predict compliance with recommended surgical care for uterovaginal prolapse.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of linked California hospital discharge and financial data. International Classification of Diseases, ninth Edition Clinical Modification codes identified records with a primary diagnosis of prolapse and concomitant coding for surgical procedures. χ2 analysis and multivariable models were used to characterize the associations between hospital characteristics and compliance. Compliant care was defined as prolapse treatment by pelvic floor reconstruction (pexy) procedure with or without hysterectomy. Failed compliance was defined as hysterectomy alone.
RESULTS: A total of 28,539 cases in 343 hospitals were analyzed. Low compliance rates were detected in all hospital types, though some were better than others. High-volume (odds ratios [OR] = 1.75; 95% CI: [1.62, 1.89]), teaching (OR = 2.03; 95% CI: [1.84, 2.25]), and private (OR = 1.28; 95% CI: [1.14, 1.46]) hospitals were more likely, while disproportionate share hospitals were less likely (OR = 0.58; 95% CI: [0.54, 0.63]) to comply with evidence-based recommendation.
CONCLUSION: Although we did find significant variation in compliance by hospital characteristics, compliance rates were low in all settings. Quality improvement efforts in the surgical treatment of uterovaginal prolapse should focus on increasing adherence to evidence-based practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21102358     DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181f37fed

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  8 in total

1.  Concomitant apical suspensory procedures in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse in the United States in 2011.

Authors:  Gina M Northington; Catherine O Hudson; Deborah R Karp; Sarah A Huber
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Utilization of apical vaginal support procedures at time of inpatient hysterectomy performed for benign conditions: a national estimate.

Authors:  Whitney Trotter Ross; Melanie R Meister; Jonathan P Shepherd; Margaret A Olsen; Jerry L Lowder
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Reoperation rates for pelvic organ prolapse repairs with biologic and synthetic grafts in a large population-based cohort.

Authors:  Ericka M Sohlberg; Kai B Dallas; Brannon T Weeks; Christopher S Elliott; Lisa Rogo-Gupta
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Practice pattern variation: treatment of pelvic organ prolapse in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Rosa A Enklaar; Mèlanie N van IJsselmuiden; Joanna IntHout; Stefan J H Haan; Olivier G A M Rijssenbeek; Rolf H Bremmer; Hugo W F van Eijndhoven
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 1.932

5.  Rates of colpopexy and colporrhaphy at the time of hysterectomy for prolapse.

Authors:  Pamela S Fairchild; Neil S Kamdar; Mitchell B Berger; Daniel M Morgan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Improving the accuracy of prolapse and incontinence procedure epidemiology by utilizing both inpatient and outpatient data.

Authors:  Christopher S Elliott; Kim F Rhoads; Craig V Comiter; Bertha Chen; Eric R Sokol
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Quality-of-care indicators for pelvic organ prolapse: development of an infrastructure for quality assessment.

Authors:  Jennifer T Anger; Victoria C S Scott; Krista Kiyosaki; Aqsa A Khan; Claudia Sevilla; Sarah E Connor; Carol P Roth; Mark S Litwin; Neil S Wenger; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-05-04       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Regional Performance of Apical Support Procedures at Time of Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: What Is the Role of Surgeon Training?

Authors:  Jessica G Putman; Melanie R Meister; Stacy M Lenger; Jerry L Lowder
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 1.913

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.