Literature DB >> 21102222

Flexible intramedullary nail use in limb lengthening.

Dmitry Popkov1, Arnold Popkov, Thierry Haumont, Pierre Journeau, Pierre Lascombes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of the external fixation associated with flexible intramedullary nailing (FIN) on the healing index (HI) in limb lengthening.
METHODS: We compared the healing index between 2 groups of children undergone the lengthening of upper and lower limbs carried out with the Ilizarov external fixator alone (group I, 194 cases of lengthening) or with the combination of the Ilizarov external fixator and intramedullary nailing (group II, 92 cases). Two nails of the diameter from 1.5 to 2.0 mm with the ray of curvature about 40 degrees to 50 degrees were used for the intramedullary nailing.
RESULTS: The HI was less in every subgroup of Group II compared with Group I. A significant difference was noted in congenital pathologies: monofocal monosegmental lengthening at the level of femur and forearm, bifocal lengthening of the tibia, polysegmental lengthening; and in acquired discrepancy: monofocal tibial lengthening, bifocal femoral lengthening, and the forearm lengthening. The reduction of HI was between 60% and 85% in congenital pathologies: monosegmental femur and forearm, bifocal femur and tibia lengthening; and in acquired discrepancy: femur, tibia, humerus and forearm monosegmental lengthening, humerus and tibia bifocal lengthening, and polysegmental in upper and lower limbs. This difference varies from 1.9 days/cm to 19.1 days/cm. That means that the duration of the external fixator was decreased of 20% to 33% of the number of days between the Group I and the Group II. Maximum diminution of HI was noted for monofocal acquired forearm cases (51.3%) and bifocal acquired femoral lengthening cases which (59.9%).
CONCLUSIONS: The flexible intramedullary nailing allows adding multiple advantages to the method of limb lengthening with the external fixator. Correctly applied the FIN indeed respects the bone biology that is essential during the limb lengthening. The major effect of application of the combination of Ilizarov frame fixation with FIN is a significant decrease of duration of the external osteosynthesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21102222     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181f0eaf9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  17 in total

1.  Distraction osteogenesis of the humerus: a case of 100% humeral lengthening in a short duration without permanent complications.

Authors:  Sheng Da Jowell Cheng; Kenneth Pak Leung Wong
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-05-15

2.  Humerus Lengthening: A Comparison of the Internal Lengthening Nail to External Fixation.

Authors:  Sherif Galal; Jonggu Shin; Peter Principe; Rena Mehta; Nathan Khabyeh-Hasbani; Amber Hamilton; Austin Fragomen; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-03-04

3.  Results of deformity correction in children with X-linked hereditary hypophosphatemic rickets by external fixation or combined technique.

Authors:  Arnold Popkov; Anna Aranovich; Dmitry Popkov
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The normal radiological anteroposterior alignment of the lower limb in children.

Authors:  Dmitry Popkov; Pierre Lascombes; Nicolas Berte; Laurent Hetzel; Bruno Ribeiro Baptista; Arnold Popkov; Pierre Journeau
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Bone marrow aspirate concentrate and platelet-rich plasma enhanced bone healing in distraction osteogenesis of the tibia.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Lee; Keun Jung Ryu; Jin Woo Kim; Kyung Chung Kang; Young Rak Choi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Progressive lengthening of short congenital forearm stump in children for prosthetic fitting.

Authors:  Dmitry Popkov; Arnold Popkov
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Humeral Lengthening with the PRECICE Magnetic Lengthening Nail.

Authors:  Ahmed I Hammouda; Shawn C Standard; S Robert Rozbruch; John E Herzenberg
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2017-04-21

8.  Reamed Intramedullary Nailing has an Adverse Effect on Bone Regeneration During the Distraction Phase in Tibial Lengthening.

Authors:  Keun Jung Ryu; Bang Hyun Kim; Jin Ho Hwang; Hyun Woo Kim; Dong Hoon Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Detecting reasons for recurrent deformity in treatment of patients with vitamin D-resistant rickets using diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  Galina Viktorovna Diachkova; Konstantin Igorevich Novikov; Mohammad Reza Effatparvar; Elena Aleksandrovna Chistova; Konstantin Aleksandrovich Diachkov; Olga Stepanovna Novikova; Anatoly Yakovlevich Korkin; Natalia Gennadyevna Shikhaleva
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-03-22

10.  Does the use of an intramedullary nail alter the duration of external fixation and rate of consolidation in tibial lengthening procedures? A systematic review.

Authors:  S Jain; P Harwood
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2012-10-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.