Literature DB >> 21099424

Proof of principle: the predisposition, infection, response, organ failure sepsis staging system.

Michael D Howell1, Daniel Talmor, Philipp Schuetz, Sabina Hunziker, Alan E Jones, Nathan I Shapiro.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In an effort to improve upon the traditional sepsis syndrome definitions, the predisposition, infection, response, organ dysfunction (PIRO) model was proposed to better characterize sepsis. The objective of this investigation was to derive and validate a sepsis staging system based on the PIRO concept that risk stratifies patients with suspected infection.
DESIGN: Three independent, observational, prospective cohorts were studied. A derivation cohort (n = 2,132) was used to create the PIRO score, identifying independent predictors of mortality. Individual values were assigned to create the weighted integer score for each parameter, yielding the final PIRO score. The prognostic performance was then investigated in independent internal (n = 4,618) and external (n = 1,004) validation cohorts.
SETTING: Two large U.S. tertiary care centers. PATIENTS: Patients admitted to the hospital from the emergency department with suspected infection.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The PIRO staging system was created by combining components of predisposition (age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, liver disease, nursing home residency, and malignancy with and without metastasis), infection (pneumonia and cellulitis), response (tachypnea, bandemia, and tachycardia), and organ dysfunction (renal, respiratory, cardiac, metabolic, and hematologic). The derived PIRO score showed stepwise increase in mortality with increasing points and high discriminatory ability with an area under the curve of 0.90 in the derivation cohort, 0.86 in internal validation, and 0.83 in external validation.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence-based support for the PIRO approach to sepsis staging. Future efforts may utilize this approach with additional parameters (e.g., genetics and novel biochemical markers) to develop further the PIRO stratification system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21099424     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182037a8e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  54 in total

1.  Expert consensus on the perioperative management of patients with sepsis.

Authors:  Jun-Ping Chen; Xiang-Ming Fang; Xiao-Ju Jin; Rong-Tian Kang; Ke-Xuan Liu; Jin-Bao Li; Yan Luo; Zhi-Jie Lu; Chang-Hong Miao; Han-Xiang Ma; Wei Mei; Yang-Wen Ou; Si-Hua Qi; Zai-Sheng Qin; Guo-Gang Tian; An-Shi Wu; Dong-Xin Wang; Tian Yu; Yong-Hao Yu; Jing Zhao; Ming-Zhang Zuo; Shi-Hai Zhang
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2015

2.  Evaluation of community-acquired sepsis by PIRO system in the emergency department.

Authors:  Yun-Xia Chen; Chun-Sheng Li
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 3.  [Clinical neurological diagnosis of sepsis-associated delirium].

Authors:  B Rosengarten; K Mayer; M A Weigand
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 4.  Time for a neonatal-specific consensus definition for sepsis.

Authors:  James L Wynn; Hector R Wong; Thomas P Shanley; Matthew J Bizzarro; Lisa Saiman; Richard A Polin
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.624

5.  An Emergency Department Validation of the SEP-3 Sepsis and Septic Shock Definitions and Comparison With 1992 Consensus Definitions.

Authors:  Daniel J Henning; Michael A Puskarich; Wesley H Self; Michael D Howell; Michael W Donnino; Donald M Yealy; Alan E Jones; Nathan I Shapiro
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  Impact of metformin use on the prognostic value of lactate in sepsis.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Green; Tony Berger; Nidhi Garg; Alison Suarez; Yolanda Hagar; Michael S Radeos; Edward A Panacek
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.469

7.  Variability analysis and the diagnosis, management, and treatment of sepsis.

Authors:  C Arianne Buchan; Andrea Bravi; Andrew J E Seely
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 8.  Sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock: changes in incidence, pathogens and outcomes.

Authors:  Greg S Martin
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.091

9.  SOFA score in septic patients: incremental prognostic value over age, comorbidities, and parameters of sepsis severity.

Authors:  Francesca Innocenti; Camilla Tozzi; Chiara Donnini; Eleonora De Villa; Alberto Conti; Maurizio Zanobetti; Riccardo Pini
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 10.  Sepsis in Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care.

Authors:  Derek S Wheeler; Hector R Wong
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.624

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.