Literature DB >> 21098770

Mediastinoscopy vs endosonography for mediastinal nodal staging of lung cancer: a randomized trial.

Jouke T Annema1, Jan P van Meerbeeck, Robert C Rintoul, Christophe Dooms, Ellen Deschepper, Olaf M Dekkers, Paul De Leyn, Jerry Braun, Nicholas R Carroll, Marleen Praet, Frederick de Ryck, Johan Vansteenkiste, Frank Vermassen, Michel I Versteegh, Maud Veseliç, Andrew G Nicholson, Klaus F Rabe, Kurt G Tournoy.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Mediastinal nodal staging is recommended for patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Surgical staging has limitations, which results in the performance of unnecessary thoracotomies. Current guidelines acknowledge minimally invasive endosonography followed by surgical staging (if no nodal metastases are found by endosonography) as an alternative to immediate surgical staging.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the 2 recommended lung cancer staging strategies. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Randomized controlled multicenter trial (Ghent, Leiden, Leuven, Papworth) conducted between February 2007 and April 2009 in 241 patients with resectable (suspected) NSCLC in whom mediastinal staging was indicated based on computed or positron emission tomography. INTERVENTION: Either surgical staging or endosonography (combined transesophageal and endobronchial ultrasound [EUS-FNA and EBUS-TBNA]) followed by surgical staging in case no nodal metastases were found at endosonography. Thoracotomy with lymph node dissection was performed when there was no evidence of mediastinal tumor spread. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was sensitivity for mediastinal nodal (N2/N3) metastases. The reference standard was surgical pathological staging. Secondary outcomes were rates of unnecessary thoracotomy and complications.
RESULTS: Two hundred forty-one patients were randomized, 118 to surgical staging and 123 to endosonography, of whom 65 also underwent surgical staging. Nodal metastases were found in 41 patients (35%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 27%-44%) by surgical staging vs 56 patients (46%; 95% CI, 37%-54%) by endosonography (P = .11) and in 62 patients (50%; 95% CI, 42%-59%) by endosonography followed by surgical staging (P = .02). This corresponded to sensitivities of 79% (41/52; 95% CI, 66%-88%) vs 85% (56/66; 95% CI, 74%-92%) (P = .47) and 94% (62/66; 95% CI, 85%-98%) (P = .02). Thoracotomy was unnecessary in 21 patients (18%; 95% CI, 12%-26%) in the mediastinoscopy group vs 9 (7%; 95% CI, 4%-13%) in the endosonography group (P = .02). The complication rate was similar in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with (suspected) NSCLC, a staging strategy combining endosonography and surgical staging compared with surgical staging alone resulted in greater sensitivity for mediastinal nodal metastases and fewer unnecessary thoracotomies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00432640.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21098770     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.1705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  98 in total

Review 1.  Interventional Pulmonology: A Brave New World.

Authors:  Hardeep S Kalsi; Ricky Thakrar; Andre F Gosling; Shahzad Shaefi; Neal Navani
Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.750

Review 2.  Acquisition and processing of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration specimens in the era of targeted lung cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  William Bulman; Anjali Saqi; Charles A Powell
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 3.  Ultrasound techniques in the evaluation of the mediastinum, part I: endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and transcutaneous mediastinal ultrasound (TMUS), introduction into ultrasound techniques.

Authors:  Christoph Frank Dietrich; Jouke Tabe Annema; Paul Clementsen; Xin Wu Cui; Mathias Maximilian Borst; Christian Jenssen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Ultrasound techniques in the evaluation of the mediastinum, part 2: mediastinal lymph node anatomy and diagnostic reach of ultrasound techniques, clinical work up of neoplastic and inflammatory mediastinal lymphadenopathy using ultrasound techniques and how to learn mediastinal endosonography.

Authors:  Christian Jenssen; Jouke Tabe Annema; Paul Clementsen; Xin-Wu Cui; Mathias Maximilian Borst; Christoph Frank Dietrich
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Evaluation of lymph node metastasis in lung cancer: who is the chief justice?

Authors:  Yang Xia; Bin Zhang; Hao Zhang; Wen Li; Ko-Pen Wang; Huahao Shen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Mediastinal staging in daily practice: endosonography, followed by cervical mediastinoscopy. Do we really need both?

Authors:  Ad F Verhagen; Olga C J Schuurbiers; Monika G Looijen-Salamon; Stefan M van der Heide; Henry A van Swieten; Erik H F M van der Heijden
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-07-09

Review 7.  Lung cancer diagnosis and staging in the minimally invasive age with increasing demands for tissue analysis.

Authors:  Erik Folch; Daniel B Costa; Jeffrey Wright; Paul A VanderLaan
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

8.  Improving the pathologic evaluation of lung cancer resection specimens.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Holly L Hilsenbeck; Elizabeth W Sales; Allen Berry; Robert W Jarrett; Christopher S Giampapa; Clara N Finch-Cruz; David Spencer
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

9.  Diagnosis and subtyping of de novo and relapsed mediastinal lymphomas by endobronchial ultrasound needle aspiration.

Authors:  Mufaddal T Moonim; Ronan Breen; Paul A Fields; George Santis
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 21.405

10.  Using pet-ct to reduce futile thoracotomy rates in non-small-cell lung cancer: a population-based review.

Authors:  M Smoragiewicz; J Laskin; D Wilson; K Ramsden; J Yee; S Lam; T Shaipanich; Y Zhai; C Ho
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.