Literature DB >> 21098336

Endogenous versus tumor-specific host response to breast carcinoma: a study of stromal response in synchronous breast primaries and biopsy site changes.

Julie M Wu1, Andrew H Beck, Lisa L Pate, Daniela Witten, Shirley X Zhu, Kelli D Montgomery, Kimberly H Allison, Matt van de Rijn, Robert B West.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We recently described two types of stromal response in breast cancer derived from gene expression studies of tenosynovial giant cell tumors and fibromatosis. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the basis of this stromal response--whether they are elicited by individual tumors or whether they represent an endogenous host reaction produced by the patient. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Stromal signatures from patients with synchronous dual primaries were analyzed by immunohistochemistry on a tissue microarray (n = 26 pairs) to evaluate the similarity of stromal responses in different tumors within the same patient. We also characterized the extent to which the stromal signatures were conserved between stromal response to injury compared to the stromal response to carcinoma using gene expression profiling and tissue microarray immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS: The two stromal response signatures showed divergent associations in synchronous primaries: the DTF fibroblast response is more likely to be similar in a patient with multiple breast primaries (permutation analysis P = 0.0027), whereas CSF1 macrophage response shows no significant concordance in separate tumors within a given patient. The DTF fibroblast signature showed more concordance across normal, cancer, and biopsy site samples from within a patient, than across normal, cancer, and biopsy site samples from a random group of patients, whereas the CSF1 macrophage response did not.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the DTF fibroblast response is host-specific, whereas the CSF1 response may be tumor-elicited. Our findings provide further insight into stromal response and may facilitate the development of therapeutic strategies to target particular stromal subtypes. ©2010 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21098336      PMCID: PMC3033467          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  24 in total

1.  The distribution of secondary growths in cancer of the breast. 1889.

Authors:  S Paget
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 9.264

2.  Chromosome abnormalities in bilateral breast carcinomas. Cytogenetic evaluation of the clonal origin of multiple primary tumors.

Authors:  N Pandis; M R Teixeira; A M Gerdes; J Limon; G Bardi; J A Andersen; I Idvall; N Mandahl; F Mitelman; S Heim
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Stromal fibroblasts present in invasive human breast carcinomas promote tumor growth and angiogenesis through elevated SDF-1/CXCL12 secretion.

Authors:  Akira Orimo; Piyush B Gupta; Dennis C Sgroi; Fernando Arenzana-Seisdedos; Thierry Delaunay; Rizwan Naeem; Vincent J Carey; Andrea L Richardson; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-05-06       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Bilateral cancer of the breast: a review of clinical, histologic, and immunohistologic characteristics.

Authors:  E E Sterns; W A Fletcher
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Progression-specific genes identified by expression profiling of matched ductal carcinomas in situ and invasive breast tumors, combining laser capture microdissection and oligonucleotide microarray analysis.

Authors:  Christina S Schuetz; Michael Bonin; Susan E Clare; Kay Nieselt; Karl Sotlar; Michael Walter; Tanja Fehm; Erich Solomayer; Olaf Riess; Diethelm Wallwiener; Raffael Kurek; Hans J Neubauer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Stromal gene expression predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer.

Authors:  Greg Finak; Nicholas Bertos; Francois Pepin; Svetlana Sadekova; Margarita Souleimanova; Hong Zhao; Haiying Chen; Gulbeyaz Omeroglu; Sarkis Meterissian; Atilla Omeroglu; Michael Hallett; Morag Park
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2008-04-27       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  Extracellular matrix signature identifies breast cancer subgroups with different clinical outcome.

Authors:  A Bergamaschi; E Tagliabue; T Sørlie; B Naume; T Triulzi; R Orlandi; H G Russnes; J M Nesland; R Tammi; P Auvinen; V-M Kosma; S Ménard; A-L Børresen-Dale
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.996

8.  Stromogenic prostatic carcinoma pattern (carcinomas with reactive stromal grade 3) in needle biopsies predicts biochemical recurrence-free survival in patients after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Yanagisawa; Rile Li; David Rowley; Hao Liu; Dov Kadmon; Brian J Miles; Thomas M Wheeler; Gustavo E Ayala
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 3.466

9.  Carcinoma-associated fibroblasts direct tumor progression of initiated human prostatic epithelium.

Authors:  A F Olumi; G D Grossfeld; S W Hayward; P R Carroll; T D Tlsty; G R Cunha
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Determination of stromal signatures in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Robert B West; Dimitry S A Nuyten; Subbaya Subramanian; Torsten O Nielsen; Christopher L Corless; Brian P Rubin; Kelli Montgomery; Shirley Zhu; Rajiv Patel; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; John R Goldblum; Patrick O Brown; Marc van de Vijver; Matt van de Rijn
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  4 in total

1.  Stromal responses among common carcinomas correlated with clinicopathologic features.

Authors:  Julia L-Y Chen; Iñigo Espinosa; Albert Y Lin; Olivia Y-W Liao; Matt van de Rijn; Robert B West
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Etiologic field effect: reappraisal of the field effect concept in cancer predisposition and progression.

Authors:  Paul Lochhead; Andrew T Chan; Reiko Nishihara; Charles S Fuchs; Andrew H Beck; Edward Giovannucci; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Gene expression in extratumoral microenvironment predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Erick Román-Pérez; Patricia Casbas-Hernández; Jason R Pirone; Jessica Rein; Lisa A Carey; Ronald A Lubet; Sendurai A Mani; Keith D Amos; Melissa A Troester
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 6.466

4.  Gene expression identifies heterogeneity of metastatic behavior among high-grade non-translocation associated soft tissue sarcomas.

Authors:  Keith M Skubitz; Amy P N Skubitz; Wayne W Xu; Xianghua Luo; Pauline Lagarde; Jean-Michel Coindre; Frédéric Chibon
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 5.531

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.