Harrell W Chesson1, Maya Sternberg, Jami S Leichliter, Sevgi O Aral. 1. Division of STD Prevention, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA. hchesson@cdc.gov
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the distribution of chlamydia, gonorrhoea and syphilis in the USA through the use of Lorenz curves and Gini coefficients. METHODS: The distribution of three sexually transmitted diseases (STD; chlamydia, gonorrhoea and primary and secondary syphilis) was examined across states and counties in the USA in 2007, based on reported case numbers. Gini coefficients, which can range from 0 (equality in STD rates across geographical units) to 1 (complete inequality such that all STD occur in one geographical unit) were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, chlamydia was the most evenly distributed and syphilis was the most concentrated of the three STD examined. The Gini coefficients for chlamydia, gonorrhoea and syphilis were 0.121, 0.255 and 0.334, respectively, when examined across states, and 0.319, 0.494 and 0.630, respectively, when examined across counties. Differences in Gini coefficients were observed when the STD distributions were examined by sex, race/ethnicity and age group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of Lorenz curves and Gini coefficients can help to assess inequalities in the distribution of STD, to gauge the suitability of geographically targeted interventions, and to help in determining the epidemic phase of STD. Having a better understanding of the disparities in the distribution of STD across states and counties by sex, race/ethnicity and age group might help in understanding why disparities in STD rates exist across different groups and in developing interventions to address these disparities.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the distribution of chlamydia, gonorrhoea and syphilis in the USA through the use of Lorenz curves and Gini coefficients. METHODS: The distribution of three sexually transmitted diseases (STD; chlamydia, gonorrhoea and primary and secondary syphilis) was examined across states and counties in the USA in 2007, based on reported case numbers. Gini coefficients, which can range from 0 (equality in STD rates across geographical units) to 1 (complete inequality such that all STD occur in one geographical unit) were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, chlamydia was the most evenly distributed and syphilis was the most concentrated of the three STD examined. The Gini coefficients for chlamydia, gonorrhoea and syphilis were 0.121, 0.255 and 0.334, respectively, when examined across states, and 0.319, 0.494 and 0.630, respectively, when examined across counties. Differences in Gini coefficients were observed when the STD distributions were examined by sex, race/ethnicity and age group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of Lorenz curves and Gini coefficients can help to assess inequalities in the distribution of STD, to gauge the suitability of geographically targeted interventions, and to help in determining the epidemic phase of STD. Having a better understanding of the disparities in the distribution of STD across states and counties by sex, race/ethnicity and age group might help in understanding why disparities in STD rates exist across different groups and in developing interventions to address these disparities.
Authors: Hector P Rodriguez; Jie Chen; Kwame Owusu-Edusei; Allen Suh; Betty Bekemeier Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-07-19 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Sabriya L Linton; Hannah L F Cooper; Mary E Kelley; Conny C Karnes; Zev Ross; Mary E Wolfe; Don Des Jarlais; Salaam Semaan; Barbara Tempalski; Elizabeth DiNenno; Teresa Finlayson; Catlainn Sionean; Cyprian Wejnert; Gabriela Paz-Bailey Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Oscar Patterson-Lomba; Edward Goldstein; Andrés Gómez-Liévano; Carlos Castillo-Chavez; Sherry Towers Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Christian L Althaus; Katherine M E Turner; Boris V Schmid; Janneke C M Heijne; Mirjam Kretzschmar; Nicola Low Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2011-06-08 Impact factor: 4.118
Authors: Jami S Leichliter; Jeremy A Grey; Kendra M Cuffe; Alex de Voux; Ryan Cramer; Sarah Hexem; Harrell W Chesson; Kyle T Bernstein Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2019-02-05 Impact factor: 3.797