PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this study is to review and synthesize the recent literature on the use of geographical targeting to improve progression through HIV and sexually transmitted disease (STD) prevention and treatment continua in different populations. RECENT FINDINGS: Geographical targeting can help identify obstacles to progression through prevention and treatment continua for each stage and in specific geographic locations. Macro-level geographical targeting can help maximize allocative efficiency, while micro-level targeting of hot spots increases effectiveness of interventions. Migration into and out of geographical areas of interest constitutes a challenge to geographical targeting in that stage-specific monitoring strategies tend to yield inaccurate results when people leave the area. Despite these issues, it is possible to identify failures in each stage of the continuum by specific spatial location such as census tracts and focus improvement efforts accordingly. SUMMARY: Vulnerabilities, risk behaviours and infections all cluster across age, race-ethnicity, socioeconomic status, key populations, risk networks and geographic space. Spatial concentration may be the most important in this context, as it allows prevention programmes to identify and reach target populations more easily. Geographical targeting can be employed at both macro and micro levels and in combination with targeting of key populations and high-risk networks.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this study is to review and synthesize the recent literature on the use of geographical targeting to improve progression through HIV and sexually transmitted disease (STD) prevention and treatment continua in different populations. RECENT FINDINGS: Geographical targeting can help identify obstacles to progression through prevention and treatment continua for each stage and in specific geographic locations. Macro-level geographical targeting can help maximize allocative efficiency, while micro-level targeting of hot spots increases effectiveness of interventions. Migration into and out of geographical areas of interest constitutes a challenge to geographical targeting in that stage-specific monitoring strategies tend to yield inaccurate results when people leave the area. Despite these issues, it is possible to identify failures in each stage of the continuum by specific spatial location such as census tracts and focus improvement efforts accordingly. SUMMARY: Vulnerabilities, risk behaviours and infections all cluster across age, race-ethnicity, socioeconomic status, key populations, risk networks and geographic space. Spatial concentration may be the most important in this context, as it allows prevention programmes to identify and reach target populations more easily. Geographical targeting can be employed at both macro and micro levels and in combination with targeting of key populations and high-risk networks.
Authors: Michael G Eberhart; Baligh R Yehia; Amy Hillier; Chelsea D Voytek; Michael B Blank; Ian Frank; David S Metzger; Kathleen A Brady Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Carol Underwood; Zoé Hendrickson; Lynn M Van Lith; John Eudes Lengwe Kunda; Elizabeth C Mallalieu Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2014-08-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Adam S Vaughan; Michael R Kramer; Hannah L F Cooper; Eli S Rosenberg; Patrick S Sullivan Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2016-12-24 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Gregg S Gonsalves; Forrest W Crawford; Paul D Cleary; Edward H Kaplan; A David Paltiel Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Jami S Leichliter; Jeremy A Grey; Kendra M Cuffe; Alex de Voux; Ryan Cramer; Sarah Hexem; Harrell W Chesson; Kyle T Bernstein Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2019-02-05 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Diego F Cuadros; Jingjing Li; Adam J Branscum; Adam Akullian; Peng Jia; Elizabeth N Mziray; Frank Tanser Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-08-22 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Jerry John Nutor; Henry Ofori Duah; Pascal Agbadi; Precious Adade Duodu; Kaboni W Gondwe Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2020-07-25 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Leo Beletsky; Jaime Arredondo; Dan Werb; Alicia Vera; Daniela Abramovitz; Joseph J Amon; Kimberly C Brouwer; Steffanie A Strathdee; Tommi L Gaines Journal: Int J Health Geogr Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 3.918
Authors: Gesine Meyer-Rath; Jessica B McGillen; Diego F Cuadros; Timothy B Hallett; Samir Bhatt; Njeri Wabiri; Frank Tanser; Thomas Rehle Journal: AIDS Date: 2018-05-15 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Diego F Cuadros; Benn Sartorius; Chris Hall; Adam Akullian; Till Bärnighausen; Frank Tanser Journal: Int J Health Geogr Date: 2018-07-11 Impact factor: 3.918
Authors: Oliver Ratmann; Joseph Kagaayi; Matthew Hall; Tanya Golubchick; Godfrey Kigozi; Xiaoyue Xi; Chris Wymant; Gertrude Nakigozi; Lucie Abeler-Dörner; David Bonsall; Astrid Gall; Anne Hoppe; Paul Kellam; Jeremiah Bazaale; Sarah Kalibbala; Oliver Laeyendecker; Justin Lessler; Fred Nalugoda; Larry W Chang; Tulio de Oliveira; Deenan Pillay; Thomas C Quinn; Steven J Reynolds; Simon E F Spencer; Robert Ssekubugu; David Serwadda; Maria J Wawer; Ronald H Gray; Christophe Fraser; M Kate Grabowski Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2020-01-14 Impact factor: 12.767