Literature DB >> 21097993

Stimulus repetition probability does not affect repetition suppression in macaque inferior temporal cortex.

Dzmitry A Kaliukhovich1, Rufin Vogels.   

Abstract

Recent human functional magnetic resonance imaging studies (Summerfield C, Trittschuh EH, Monti JM, Mesulam MM, Egner T. 2008. Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations. Nat Neurosci. 11:1004-1006.) showed that adaptation or repetition suppression is affected by contextual factors related to perceptual expectations, suggesting that adaptation results from a fulfillment of perceptual expectation or a reduction in prediction error. This view contrasts with the bottom-up fatigue or sharpening mechanisms of adaptation proposed in single-cell studies. We examined whether stimulus repetition probability affects adaptation of spiking activity and local field potentials (LFPs) in macaque inferior temporal (IT) cortex, using a protocol similar to that of Summerfield et al. Monkeys were exposed to 2 randomly interleaved trials, each consisting of either 2 identical (rep trial) or 2 different stimuli (alt trial). Trials were presented in repetition (rep) blocks consisting of 75% of rep trials and 25% of alt trials or in alternation (alt) blocks having opposite repetition probabilities. For both spiking and LFP activities, the stimulus-selective adaptation did not differ significantly between rep and alt blocks. The number of preceding rep or alt trials and the trial position within a block did not affect adaptation. This absence of any effect of stimulus repetition probability on adaptation suggests that adaptation in IT is not caused by contextual factors related to perceptual expectation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21097993     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhq207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  52 in total

1.  Statistical learning of visual transitions in monkey inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Travis Meyer; Carl R Olson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Repetition suppression for visual actions in the macaque superior temporal sulcus.

Authors:  Pradeep Kuravi; Vittorio Caggiano; Martin Giese; Rufin Vogels
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Neural responses to visual scenes reveals inconsistencies between fMRI adaptation and multivoxel pattern analysis.

Authors:  Russell A Epstein; Lindsay K Morgan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Prior expectation mediates neural adaptation to repeated sounds in the auditory cortex: an MEG study.

Authors:  Ana Todorovic; Freek van Ede; Eric Maris; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  fMRI repetition suppression: neuronal adaptation or stimulus expectation?

Authors:  Jonas Larsson; Andrew T Smith
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Prediction suppression and surprise enhancement in monkey inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Suchitra Ramachandran; Travis Meyer; Carl R Olson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Face Repetition Probability Does Not Affect Repetition Suppression in Macaque Inferotemporal Cortex.

Authors:  Kasper Vinken; Hans P Op de Beeck; Rufin Vogels
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Repetition Priming and Repetition Suppression: A Case for Enhanced Efficiency Through Neural Synchronization.

Authors:  Stephen J Gotts; Carson C Chow; Alex Martin
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.065

9.  Mirror neurons in monkey area F5 do not adapt to the observation of repeated actions.

Authors:  Vittorio Caggiano; Joern K Pomper; Falk Fleischer; Leonardo Fogassi; Martin Giese; Peter Thier
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Suppressed Sensory Response to Predictable Object Stimuli throughout the Ventral Visual Stream.

Authors:  David Richter; Matthias Ekman; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.