Literature DB >> 2109544

Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in adolescent males: a cost-based decision analysis.

A G Randolph1, A E Washington.   

Abstract

To evaluate the cost and benefits of screening tests for Chlamydia trachomatis in adolescent males, we developed a decision analysis model and compared the leukocyte esterase urine dipstick test with culture, with direct-smear fluorescent antibody (DFA), and with the option of no screening (no treatment). The leukocyte esterase test has the lowest average cost-per-cure ($51) compared with direct-smear fluorescent antibody ($192) and culture ($414). Compared with the DFA, we estimate that the leukocyte esterase test saves over $9,727 per cohort of 1,000 sexually active adolescent males screened. Sensitivity analyses show the leukocyte esterase test results in a lower cost-per-cure and lower overall costs (per cohort) than culture and direct-smear fluorescent antibody at any prevalence of C. trachomatis infection, and lower overall costs (per cohort) than no screening at prevalences above 21 percent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2109544      PMCID: PMC1404639          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.80.5.545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  25 in total

1.  Efficiency and cost-effectiveness of field follow-up for patients with Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a sexually transmitted diseases clinic.

Authors:  B P Katz; C S Danos; T S Quinn; V Caine; R B Jones
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1988 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.830

2.  Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in adolescent males: value of first-catch urine examination.

Authors:  H Adger; M A Shafer; R L Sweet; J Schachter
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-10-27       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Compliance with therapeutic regimens.

Authors:  S Jay; I F Litt; R H Durant
Journal:  J Adolesc Health Care       Date:  1984-04

Review 4.  Epidemiology of sexually transmitted Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  S E Thompson; A E Washington
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 5.  Compliance with medical regimens during adolescence.

Authors:  I F Litt; W R Cuskey
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.278

Review 6.  Pelvic inflammatory disease and its sequelae in adolescents.

Authors:  A E Washington; R L Sweet; M A Shafer
Journal:  J Adolesc Health Care       Date:  1985-07

7.  Use of a leukocyte esterase dipstick to detect Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae urethritis in asymptomatic adolescent male detainees.

Authors:  S F O'Brien; T A Bell; J A Farrow
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Chlamydia trachomatis infection in sexually active adolescents: prevalence and risk factors.

Authors:  M R Chacko; J C Lovchik
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Chlamydia trachomatis urethral infections in men. Prevalence, risk factors, and clinical manifestations.

Authors:  W E Stamm; L A Koutsky; J K Benedetti; J L Jourden; R C Brunham; K K Holmes
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 10.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infections.

Authors:  W E Stamm
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  7 in total

1.  Is it cost-beneficial to screen adolescent males for chlamydia?

Authors:  E R Alexander
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a systematic review of the economic evaluations and modelling.

Authors:  T E Roberts; S Robinson; P Barton; S Bryan; N Low
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 3.  Drug therapies for sexually transmitted diseases. Clinical and economic considerations.

Authors:  W R Bowie
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Non-invasive sampling for detection of genital infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in males utilising urinary leukocyte esterase tests and immunoassays.

Authors:  M A Domeika; M Bassiri; P A Mårdh
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 5.  Chlamydia trachomatis in adolescents and adults. Clinical and economic implications.

Authors:  C A Marra; D M Patrick; R Reynolds; F Marra
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in an Australian high school student population.

Authors:  J Debattista; P Martin; J Jamieson; K Crane; I Dolton; S Russell-Hall; J DeSilva; R Hargrave; T Robinson; N Ryan; M Mortlock
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.519

7.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in general practice urine samples.

Authors:  M S Dryden; M Wilkinson; M Redman; M R Millar
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.386

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.