Literature DB >> 21094432

Pilot multimethod trial of a school-ethos intervention to reduce substance use: building hypotheses about upstream pathways to prevention.

Christopher P Bonell1, Annik M Sorhaindo, Elizabeth E Allen, Vicki J Strange, Meg Wiggins, Adam Fletcher, Ann R A Oakley, Lyndal M Bond, Brian R Flay, George C Patton, Tim Rhodes.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Interventions to improve school ethos can reduce substance use but "upstream" causal pathways relating to implementation and school-level changes are uncertain. We use qualitative and quantitative data from a pilot trial to build hypotheses regarding these.
METHODS: The Healthy School Ethos intervention involved two schools being provided with facilitation, training, and funding to plan and implement actions (some mandatory and some locally determined) to improve school ethos over one year. The evaluation involved a pilot-trial with two intervention and two comparison schools; semi-structured interviews with facilitators, staff, and students; and baseline and follow-up surveys with students aged 11 to 12 years.
RESULTS: Student accounts linked participation in planning or delivering intervention activities with improved self-regard and relationships with staff and other students. Some activities such as re-writing school rules involved broad participation. Students in receipt of actions such as peer-mediation or motivational sessions reported benefits such as improved safety and relationships. Some student accounts linked improved self-regard and relationships with increased engagement and aspirations, and reduced substance use. At 9-month follow-up, students in intervention schools reported less hurting and teasing of others and feeling unsafe at school. Other outcomes suggested intervention benefits but were not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: School-ethos interventions may reduce substance use through upstream pathways involving the aforementioned factors. Future phase-III trials should quantitatively model the extent to which these mediate intervention effects.
Copyright © 2010 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21094432     DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Health        ISSN: 1054-139X            Impact factor:   5.012


  6 in total

1.  Does school ethos explain the relationship between value-added education and teenage substance use? A cohort study.

Authors:  Wolfgang A Markham; Robert Young; Helen Sweeting; Patrick West; Paul Aveyard
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Replication of a whole school ethos-changing intervention: different context, similar effects, additional insights.

Authors:  Penelope Hawe; Lyndal Bond; Laura M Ghali; Rosemary Perry; Colleen M Davison; David M Casey; Helen Butler; Cynthia M Webster; Bert Scholz
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  The three stages of building and testing mid-level theories in a realist RCT: a theoretical and methodological case-example.

Authors:  Farah Jamal; Adam Fletcher; Nichola Shackleton; Diana Elbourne; Russell Viner; Chris Bonell
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  School social fragmentation, economic deprivation and social cohesion and adolescent physical inactivity: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Roman Pabayo; Michel Janosz; Sherri Bisset; Ichiro Kawachi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Broader impacts of an intervention to transform school environments on student behaviour and school functioning: post hoc analyses from the INCLUSIVE cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Christopher Bonell; Matthew Dodd; Elizabeth Allen; Leonardo Bevilacqua; Jennifer McGowan; Charles Opondo; Joanna Sturgess; Diana Elbourne; Emily Warren; Russell M Viner
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Individual-, family-, and school-level interventions targeting multiple risk behaviours in young people.

Authors:  Georgina MacArthur; Deborah M Caldwell; James Redmore; Sarah H Watkins; Ruth Kipping; James White; Catherine Chittleborough; Rebecca Langford; Vanessa Er; Raghu Lingam; Keryn Pasch; David Gunnell; Matthew Hickman; Rona Campbell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.