Literature DB >> 21093922

Effect of preoperative pupil size on quality of vision after wavefront-guided LASIK.

Annie Chan1, Edward E Manche.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of preoperative pupil size on quality of vision after wavefront-guided LASIK.
DESIGN: Prospective study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred two eyes. INTERVENTION: LASIK for mild to moderate myopia or astigmatism (preoperative manifest spherical equivalent, -3.99±1.42 diopters). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Questionnaires evaluating specific visual symptoms before and after surgery. Each eye was evaluated before surgery, and 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Pupils were stratified according to size: small (≤5.5 mm), medium (5.6-6.4 mm), or large (≥6.5 mm). Mesopic pupil size and preoperative and postoperative variables were evaluated using an analysis of variance. A regression model was also performed to determine the correlation between mean spherical equivalent and cylinder and visual symptoms.
RESULTS: In the early postoperative period, there was no difference between the 3 groups with regard to any of the symptoms. At the final 12-month postoperative visit, patients with medium pupils experienced less glare at night than small pupils (P = 0.02), medium pupils had less halos than small or large pupils (P = 0.001 and P = 0.02, respectively), and medium pupils experienced greater satisfaction in visual improvement than small pupils (P = 0.014).
CONCLUSIONS: Twelve months after wavefront-guided LASIK surgery, large pupil size does not positively correlate with any postoperative visual symptoms.
Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21093922     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.07.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  13 in total

1.  [Avoidance and management of complications in laser in situ keratomileusis].

Authors:  T Kohnen; O K Klaproth
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Comparing aspheric ablation profile with standard corneal ablation for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism, a contralateral eye study.

Authors:  Mohammad Ghoreishi; Afsaneh Naderi Beni; Zahra Naderi Beni; Alireza Zandi; Farzan Kianersi
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Can we measure mesopic pupil size with the cobalt blue light slit-lamp biomicroscopy method?

Authors:  Miguel J Maldonado; Alberto López-Miguel; David P Piñero; José R Juberías; Juan C Nieto; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (Lasik) versus wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (Prk): a prospective randomized eye-to-eye comparison (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Edward E Manche; Weldon W Haw
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2011-12

5.  Visual outcome after correcting the refractive error of large pupil patients with wavefront-guided ablation.

Authors:  Mounir A Khalifa; Waleed A Allam; Mohamed S Shaheen
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-03

6.  Temporal evolution of the biological response to laser-induced refractive index change (LIRIC) in rabbit corneas.

Authors:  Kaitlin T Wozniak; Sam C Butler; Xu He; Jonathan D Ellis; Wayne H Knox; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.770

7.  One-year eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis in hyperopes.

Authors:  Christopher S Sáles; Edward E Manche
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11-12

8.  Satisfaction level of physicians who have undergone corneal refractive surgery.

Authors:  Eun Kyoung Lee; Ji-Won Kwon; Joon Young Hyon; Young Keun Han
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-12

9.  Minimum pupil in pupillary response to light and myopia affect disk halo size: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Feng Zhao; Tian Han; Xun Chen; Zhi Chen; Ke Zheng; Xiaoying Wang; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Quality of life impact of refractive correction (QIRC) results three years after SMILE and FS-LASIK.

Authors:  Tian Han; Ye Xu; Xiao Han; Jianmin Shang; Li Zeng; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.