Literature DB >> 21093026

Peanut allergy: Clinical and immunologic differences among patients from 3 different geographic regions.

Andrea Vereda1, Marianne van Hage, Staffan Ahlstedt, Maria Dolores Ibañez, Javier Cuesta-Herranz, Jenny van Odijk, Magnus Wickman, Hugh A Sampson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peanut allergy affects persons from various geographic regions where populations are exposed to different dietary habits and environmental pollens.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe the clinical and immunologic characteristics of patients with peanut allergy from 3 countries (Spain, the United States, and Sweden) using a molecular component diagnostic approach.
METHODS: Patients with peanut allergy from Madrid (Spain, n = 50), New York (United States, n = 30), Gothenburg, and Stockholm (both Sweden, n = 35) were enrolled. Clinical data were obtained either from a specific questionnaire or gathered from chart reviews. IgE antibodies to peanut extract and the peanut allergens rAra h 1, 2, 3, 8 and 9, as well as to cross-reactive birch (rBet v 1) and grass (rPhl p 1, 5, 7, and 12) pollen allergens, were analyzed.
RESULTS: American patients frequently had IgE antibodies to rAra h 1 to 3 (56.7% to 90.0%) and often presented with severe symptoms. Spanish patients recognized these 3 recombinant peanut allergens less frequently (16.0% to 42.0%), were more often sensitized to the lipid transfer protein rAra h 9 (60.0%), and typically had peanut allergy after becoming allergic to other plant-derived foods. Swedish patients detected rAra h 1 to 3 more frequently than Spanish patients (37.1% to 74.3%) and had the highest sensitization rate to the Bet v 1 homologue rAra h 8 (65.7%), as well as to rBet v 1 (82.9%). Spanish and Swedish patients became allergic to peanut at 2 years or later, whereas the American children became allergic around 1 year of age.
CONCLUSIONS: Peanut allergy has different clinical and immunologic patterns in different areas of the world. Allergen component diagnostics might help us to better understand this complex entity.
Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21093026     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  60 in total

1.  Meta-Analysis-Based Guidance for Dietary Management in Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Authors:  Alfredo J Lucendo
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2015-10

2.  Novel diagnostic techniques and therapeutic strategies for IgE-mediated food allergy.

Authors:  Stefano Passanisi; Fortunato Lombardo; Giuseppe Crisafulli; Giuseppina Salzano; Tommaso Aversa; Giovanni B Pajno
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Proc       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.587

Review 3.  Food allergy: epidemiology and natural history.

Authors:  Jessica Savage; Christina B Johns
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.479

4.  Structure and function of the peanut panallergen Ara h 8.

Authors:  Barry K Hurlburt; Lesa R Offermann; Jane K McBride; Karolina A Majorek; Soheila J Maleki; Maksymilian Chruszcz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Ara h 1-reactive T cells in individuals with peanut allergy.

Authors:  Jonathan H DeLong; Kelly Hetherington Simpson; Erik Wambre; Eddie A James; David Robinson; William W Kwok
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 6.  Oral food challenges in children: review and future perspectives.

Authors:  Matthew Greenhawt
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.806

7.  Ara h 6 complements Ara h 2 as an important marker for IgE reactivity to peanut.

Authors:  Audrey E Koid; Martin D Chapman; Robert G Hamilton; Ronald van Ree; Serge A Versteeg; Stephen C Dreskin; Stef J Koppelman; Sabina Wünschmann
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 5.279

8.  IgE, but not IgG4, antibodies to Ara h 2 distinguish peanut allergy from asymptomatic peanut sensitization.

Authors:  X Hong; D Caruso; R Kumar; R Liu; X Liu; G Wang; J A Pongracic; X Wang
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 13.146

9.  Utility of component analyses in subjects undergoing sublingual immunotherapy for peanut allergy.

Authors:  C M Burk; M Kulis; N Leung; E H Kim; A W Burks; B P Vickery
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.018

10.  Epitope analysis of Ara h 2 and Ara h 6: characteristic patterns of IgE-binding fingerprints among individuals with similar clinical histories.

Authors:  K Otsu; R Guo; S C Dreskin
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.018

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.