Literature DB >> 26362760

Utility of component analyses in subjects undergoing sublingual immunotherapy for peanut allergy.

C M Burk1, M Kulis1, N Leung1, E H Kim1, A W Burks1, B P Vickery1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with peanut changes clinical and immune responses in most peanut-allergic individuals, but the response is highly variable.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the component-specific effects of peanut SLIT and determine whether peanut component testing could predict the outcome of a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) after 12 months of peanut SLIT.
METHODS: We included 33 subjects who underwent peanut SLIT with a DBPCFC of 2500 mg of peanut protein performed after 12 months of therapy. Plasma samples from baseline and after 12 months of peanut SLIT were assayed using ImmunoCAP for IgE and IgG4 against whole peanut, Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 3, Ara h 8, and Ara h 9.
RESULTS: Following 12 months of SLIT, 10 subjects (30%) passed the DBPCFC without symptoms and were considered desensitized. Subjects that failed the DBPCFC tolerated a median of 460 mg peanut protein (range: 10-1710 mg). The desensitized group had significantly lower baseline levels of IgE against peanut (median 40.8 vs. 231 kUA /L, P = 0.0082), Ara h 2 (median 17 vs. 113 kUA /L, P = 0.0082), and Ara h 3 (median 0.3 vs. 8.5 kUA /L, P = 0.0396). ROC curves indicated that baseline IgE against peanut and Ara h 2 were equally effective at discriminating between the two groups (AUC = 0.7957, P = 0.007752 for both). CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In this cohort of subjects undergoing SLIT for peanut allergy, lower baseline levels of IgE against Ara h 2, Ara h 3, and peanut were associated with successful desensitization.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  component resolved diagnosis (CRD); desensitization; peanut allergy; sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26362760      PMCID: PMC4732904          DOI: 10.1111/cea.12635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy        ISSN: 0954-7894            Impact factor:   5.018


  26 in total

1.  Monitoring Ara h 1, 2 and 3-sIgE and sIgG4 antibodies in peanut allergic children receiving oral rush immunotherapy.

Authors:  Asako Nozawa; Yoshihisa Okamoto; Robert Movérare; Magnus P Borres; Kazuyunki Kurihara
Journal:  Pediatr Allergy Immunol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 6.377

2.  Fatalities due to anaphylactic reactions to foods.

Authors:  S A Bock; A Muñoz-Furlong; H A Sampson
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 10.793

3.  Lipid transfer protein (Ara h 9) as a new peanut allergen relevant for a Mediterranean allergic population.

Authors:  Susanne Krause; Gerald Reese; Stefanie Randow; Danila Zennaro; Donato Quaratino; Paola Palazzo; Maria Antonietta Ciardiello; Arnd Petersen; Wolf-Meinhard Becker; Adriano Mari
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 10.793

4.  A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of sublingual versus oral immunotherapy for the treatment of peanut allergy.

Authors:  Satya D Narisety; Pamela A Frischmeyer-Guerrerio; Corinne A Keet; Mark Gorelik; John Schroeder; Robert G Hamilton; Robert A Wood
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 10.793

5.  Sustained unresponsiveness to peanut in subjects who have completed peanut oral immunotherapy.

Authors:  Brian P Vickery; Amy M Scurlock; Michael Kulis; Pamela H Steele; Janet Kamilaris; Jelena P Berglund; Caitlin Burk; Anne Hiegel; Suzanna Carlisle; Lynn Christie; Tamara T Perry; Robbie D Pesek; Saira Sheikh; Yamini Virkud; P Brian Smith; Mohamed H Shamji; Stephen R Durham; Stacie M Jones; A Wesley Burks
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 10.793

6.  Peanut epitopes for IgE and IgG4 in peanut-sensitized children in relation to severity of peanut allergy.

Authors:  Annebeth E Flinterman; Edward F Knol; Doerthe A Lencer; Ludmilla Bardina; Constance F den Hartog Jager; Jing Lin; Suzanne G M A Pasmans; Carla A F M Bruijnzeel-Koomen; Hugh A Sampson; Els van Hoffen; Wayne G Shreffler
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 10.793

7.  The utility of peanut components in the diagnosis of IgE-mediated peanut allergy among distinct populations.

Authors:  Jay A Lieberman; Susanne Glaumann; Sofia Batelson; Magnus P Borres; Hugh A Sampson; Caroline Nilsson
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2012-12-27

Review 8.  Advances in diagnosing peanut allergy.

Authors:  Scott H Sicherer; Robert A Wood
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2012-12-27

Review 9.  Oral and sublingual immunotherapy for food allergy: current progress and future directions.

Authors:  Timothy P Moran; Brian P Vickery; A Wesley Burks
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 7.486

10.  Allergy or tolerance in children sensitized to peanut: prevalence and differentiation using component-resolved diagnostics.

Authors:  Nicolaos Nicolaou; Maryam Poorafshar; Clare Murray; Angela Simpson; Henric Winell; Gina Kerry; Annika Härlin; Ashley Woodcock; Staffan Ahlstedt; Adnan Custovic
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 10.793

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of Immune Responses in Food Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Johanna M Smeekens; Michael D Kulis
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.479

2.  Desensitization for Peanut Allergies in Children.

Authors:  Rekha D Jhamnani; Pamela Frischmeyer-Guerrerio
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Allergy       Date:  2016-07-21

Review 3.  Oral and Sublingual Immunotherapy for Treatment of IgE-Mediated Food Allergy.

Authors:  Amy M Scurlock
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 8.667

4.  Long-term sublingual immunotherapy for peanut allergy in children: Clinical and immunologic evidence of desensitization.

Authors:  Edwin H Kim; Luanna Yang; Ping Ye; Rishu Guo; Quefeng Li; Michael D Kulis; A Wesley Burks
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 5.  Biomarkers in Food Allergy Immunotherapy.

Authors:  LaKeya C Hardy; Johanna M Smeekens; Michael D Kulis
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 6.  Biomarkers and mechanisms of tolerance induction in food allergic patients drive new therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  Carolyn H Baloh; Michelle F Huffaker; Tanya Laidlaw
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 7.  Using Component-Resolved Diagnostics in the Management of Peanut-Allergic Patients.

Authors:  F C van Erp; R J B Klemans; Y Meijer; C K van der Ent; A C Knulst
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Allergy       Date:  2016-04-07

8.  Ara h 2 is the dominant peanut allergen despite similarities with Ara h 6.

Authors:  Oliver Hemmings; George Du Toit; Suzana Radulovic; Gideon Lack; Alexandra F Santos
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 10.793

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.