Literature DB >> 21091959

On the number of trials needed for a stable feedback-related negativity.

Josep Marco-Pallares1, David Cucurell, Thomas F Münte, Nadine Strien, Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells.   

Abstract

Feedback-related negativity is an event-related brain potential elicited by negative feedback. Its properties make it a valuable tool for the assessment of cognitive-affective processes that are involved in feedback and reward processing. The present study sought to determine the minimum number of trials that are required to obtain a reliable FRN component using a simple gambling paradigm. Three independent groups of young participants and one group of old participants were used. In the experimental conditions with healthy young controls, 20 trials were sufficient to measure the optimal FRN amplitude. In older participants, 50 trials were needed to obtain a reliable FRN. Whereas 20 trials would be enough to ensure a reliable FRN component in studies with nonclinical samples, the number of trials needed in clinical and cognitively impaired populations has to be determined based on the signal-to-noise ratios and the characteristics of the signals recorded.
Copyright © 2010 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21091959     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01152.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  43 in total

1.  Brain oscillatory activity associated with task switching and feedback processing.

Authors:  Toni Cunillera; Lluís Fuentemilla; Jose Periañez; Josep Marco-Pallarès; Ulrike M Krämer; Estela Càmara; Thomas F Münte; Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Executive control- and reward-related neural processes associated with the opportunity to engage in voluntary dishonest moral decision making.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Hu; Narun Pornpattananangkul; Robin Nusslock
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Shifts in attentional scope modulate event-related potentials evoked by reward.

Authors:  Ajay Nadig; Nicholas J Kelley; Narun Pornpattananangkul; James E Glazer; Robin Nusslock
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Electrophysiological correlates reflect the integration of model-based and model-free decision information.

Authors:  Ben Eppinger; Maik Walter; Shu-Chen Li
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Assessing the internal consistency of the event-related potential: An example analysis.

Authors:  Nina N Thigpen; Emily S Kappenman; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  What you give is what you get: Payment of one randomly selected trial induces risk-aversion and decreases brain responses to monetary feedback.

Authors:  Barbara Schmidt; Luisa Keßler; Holger Hecht; Johannes Hewig; Clay B Holroyd; Wolfgang H R Miltner
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  High sensation seeking is associated with behavioral and neural insensitivity to increased negative outcomes during decision-making under uncertainty.

Authors:  Sihua Xu; Lijuan Luo; Zhiguo Xiao; Ke Zhao; Hua Wang; Cencen Wang; Hengyi Rao
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Reward processing deficits and impulsivity in high-risk offspring of alcoholics: A study of event-related potentials during a monetary gambling task.

Authors:  Chella Kamarajan; Ashwini K Pandey; David B Chorlian; Niklas Manz; Arthur T Stimus; Lance O Bauer; Victor M Hesselbrock; Marc A Schuckit; Samuel Kuperman; John Kramer; Bernice Porjesz
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  Exposure to money modulates neural responses to outcome evaluations involving social reward.

Authors:  Jin Li; Lei Liu; Yu Sun; Wei Fan; Mei Li; Yiping Zhong
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Self-affirmation enhances the processing of uncertainty: An event-related potential study.

Authors:  Ruolei Gu; Jing Yang; Ziyan Yang; Zihang Huang; Mingzheng Wu; Huajian Cai
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.