Literature DB >> 30488229

Self-affirmation enhances the processing of uncertainty: An event-related potential study.

Ruolei Gu1,2, Jing Yang3, Ziyan Yang1,2, Zihang Huang1,2, Mingzheng Wu4, Huajian Cai5,6.   

Abstract

We proposed that self-affirmation can endow people with more cognitive resource to cope with uncertainty. We tested this possibility with an event-related potential (ERP) study by examining how self-affirmation influences ambiguous feedback processing in a simple gambling task, which was used to investigate risk decision-making. We assigned 48 participants randomly to the affirmation and non-affirmation (i.e., control) groups. All participants accepted the manipulation first and then completed the gambling task with an electroencephalogram (EEG) recording, in which participants might receive a positive (winning), negative (losing), or ambiguous (unknown valence) outcome after they made a choice. We considered both the feedback-related negativity (FRN) and P3 components elicited by the outcome feedback, which reflected the amount of cognitive resources being invested in the early and late stages of the outcome feedback processing, respectively. ERP results showed that ambiguous feedback elicited a larger FRN among affirmed participants than unaffirmed participants but exerted no influence on the P3. This finding suggests that self-affirmation may help coping with uncertainty by enhancing the early processing of uncertainty.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive resource; Event-related potential (ERP); Feedback-related negativity (FRN); Outcome feedback; Self-affirmation; Uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30488229     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-018-00673-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  66 in total

1.  Temporal dynamics of prediction error processing during reward-based decision making.

Authors:  Marios G Philiastides; Guido Biele; Niki Vavatzanidis; Philipp Kazzer; Hauke R Heekeren
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b.

Authors:  John Polich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Neural substrates of reward magnitude, probability, and risk during a wheel of fortune decision-making task.

Authors:  Bruce W Smith; Derek G V Mitchell; Michael G Hardin; Sandra Jazbec; Daniel Fridberg; R James R Blair; Monique Ernst
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time.

Authors:  M Kutas; G McCarthy; E Donchin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-08-19       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  On the number of trials needed for P300.

Authors:  J Cohen; J Polich
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.997

6.  How to get statistically significant effects in any ERP experiment (and why you shouldn't).

Authors:  Steven J Luck; Nicholas Gaspelin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Variants of uncertainty.

Authors:  D Kahneman; A Tversky
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1982-03

8.  The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity.

Authors:  Clay B Holroyd; Michael G H Coles
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Self-affirmation activates brain systems associated with self-related processing and reward and is reinforced by future orientation.

Authors:  Christopher N Cascio; Matthew Brook O'Donnell; Francis J Tinney; Matthew D Lieberman; Shelley E Taylor; Victor J Strecher; Emily B Falk
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Different varieties of uncertainty in human decision-making.

Authors:  Amy R Bland; Alexandre Schaefer
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  1 in total

1.  Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) as an Optimal Treatment for Schizophrenia Risk Decision: an ERSP Study.

Authors:  Yang Wu; Lu Wang; Fengqiong Yu; Gong-Jun Ji; Guixian Xiao; Xu Feifei; Zhu Chunyan; Chen Xingui; Kai Wang
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.157

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.