Literature DB >> 21091466

Sex reduces genetic variation: a multidisciplinary review.

Root Gorelick1, Henry H Q Heng.   

Abstract

For over a century, the paradigm has been that sex invariably increases genetic variation, despite many renowned biologists asserting that sex decreases most genetic variation. Sex is usually perceived as the source of additive genetic variance that drives eukaryotic evolution vis-à-vis adaptation and Fisher's fundamental theorem. However, evidence for sex decreasing genetic variation appears in ecology, paleontology, population genetics, and cancer biology. The common thread among many of these disciplines is that sex acts like a coarse filter, weeding out major changes, such as chromosomal rearrangements (that are almost always deleterious), but letting minor variation, such as changes at the nucleotide or gene level (that are often neutral), flow through the sexual sieve. Sex acts as a constraint on genomic and epigenetic variation, thereby limiting adaptive evolution. The diverse reasons for sex reducing genetic variation (especially at the genome level) and slowing down evolution may provide a sufficient benefit to offset the famed costs of sex.
© 2010 The Author(s). Evolution© 2010 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21091466     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01173.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  17 in total

1.  Unstable genomes elevate transcriptome dynamics.

Authors:  Joshua B Stevens; Guo Liu; Batoul Y Abdallah; Steven D Horne; Karen J Ye; Steven W Bremer; Christine J Ye; Stephen A Krawetz; Henry H Heng
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Single cell heterogeneity: why unstable genomes are incompatible with average profiles.

Authors:  Batoul Y Abdallah; Steven D Horne; Joshua B Stevens; Guo Liu; Andrew Y Ying; Barbara Vanderhyden; Stephen A Krawetz; Root Gorelick; Henry Hq Heng
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  Synergy from reproductive division of labor and genetic complexity drive the evolution of sex.

Authors:  Klaus Jaffe
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 1.365

4.  Does sex speed up evolutionary rate and increase biodiversity?

Authors:  Carlos J Melián; David Alonso; Stefano Allesina; Richard S Condit; Rampal S Etienne
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  "Jack-of-all-trades" is parthenogenetic.

Authors:  Mark Maraun; Paul S P Bischof; Finn L Klemp; Jule Pollack; Linnea Raab; Jan Schmerbach; Ina Schaefer; Stefan Scheu; Tancredi Caruso
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.167

6.  Stress, genomic adaptation, and the evolutionary trade-off.

Authors:  Steven D Horne; Saroj K Chowdhury; Henry H Q Heng
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Why it is crucial to analyze non clonal chromosome aberrations or NCCAs?

Authors:  Henry H Q Heng; Sarah M Regan; Guo Liu; Christine J Ye
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  From re-pair and re-production to (re)generation: bio-objects as indicators of cultural change.

Authors:  Bettina Bock von Wulfingen
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.351

9.  New insights into the karyotype evolution of the free-living flatworm Macrostomum lignano (Platyhelminthes, Turbellaria).

Authors:  Kira S Zadesenets; Lukas Schärer; Nikolay B Rubtsov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A Postgenomic Perspective on Molecular Cytogenetics.

Authors:  Henry H Heng; Steven D Horne; Sophia Chaudhry; Sarah M Regan; Guo Liu; Batoul Y Abdallah; Christine J Ye
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.