Literature DB >> 21091139

Urine particles analysis: performance evaluation of Sysmex UF-1000i and comparison among urine flow cytometer, dipstick, and visual microscopic examination.

Tang Jiang1, Peisong Chen, Juan Ouyang, Shihong Zhang, Dan Cai.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to evaluate a newly invented urine flow cytometer, and select an optimal strategy for urinalysis in clinical practice.
METHODS: The performance of UF-1000i was evaluated in both control material and patient samples. A total of 1631 specimens were collected and analysed by visual microscopy examination (VME), UF-1000i flow cytometer (Sysmex Medical Electronics Co, Kobe, Japan) and an automated dipstick reflectometer Clinitek Atlas (Bayer Corp, Elkhart, USA).
RESULTS: UF-1000i showed good imprecision performance for the main parameters in urine particles with CV values less than 20%. The results from UF-1000i correlated well with VME for erythrocytes (r = 0.96), leukocytes (r = 0.98), and epithelial cell (r = 0.84). The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was 0.879, 0.903, 0.783, and 0.817 respectively for erythrocytes, leukocytes, bacteria and CAST in UF-1000i. While in Clinitek Atlas, the AUC was 0.848, 0.803, 0.761, and 0.754 respectively. Sensitivity of combination of the two methods for screening remained at 98% as compared to VME alone, while reducing the visual review rate down to 40%.
CONCLUSION: UF-1000i is capable of reproducible measurement of urine particles in the clinically relevant range and shows its advantage over Atlas. Combination of the two methods is an optimal strategy for urine sample screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21091139     DOI: 10.3109/00365513.2010.535011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest        ISSN: 0036-5513            Impact factor:   1.713


  11 in total

1.  UriSed 3 and UX-2000 automated urine sediment analyzers vs manual microscopic method: A comparative performance analysis.

Authors:  Sathima Laiwejpithaya; Preechaya Wongkrajang; Kanit Reesukumal; Chonticha Bucha; Suriya Meepanya; Chanutchaya Pattanavin; Varanya Khejonnit; Achara Chuntarut
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Comparative Performance Analysis of Urised 3 and DIRUI FUS-200 Automated Urine Sediment Analyzers and Manual Microscopic Method.

Authors:  Emre Yalcinkaya; Hayriye Erman; Eray Kirac; Afife Serifoglu; Alperen Aksoy; Ferruh K Isman; Mustafa B Cekmen
Journal:  Medeni Med J       Date:  2019-09-27

Review 3.  Progress in Automated Urinalysis.

Authors:  Matthijs Oyaert; Joris Delanghe
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry combined with UF-5000i urine flow cytometry to directly identify pathogens in clinical urine specimens within 1 hour.

Authors:  Chuang Sun; Xiao Zhang; Jingqiao Wang; Chen Cheng; Haiquan Kang; Bing Gu; Ping Ma
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-05

5.  Profile of sexually transmitted infections causing urethritis and a related inflammatory reaction in urine among heterosexual males: A flow-cytometry study.

Authors:  Stanislav Tjagur; Reet Mändar; Margus Punab
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Rapid discrimination of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria in liquid samples by using NaOH-sodium dodecyl sulfate solution and flow cytometry.

Authors:  Atsushi Wada; Mari Kono; Sawako Kawauchi; Yuri Takagi; Takashi Morikawa; Kunihiro Funakoshi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Levels of albuminuria and risk of developing macroalbuminuria in type 2 diabetes: historical cohort study.

Authors:  Shoma Chida; Yoshikuni Fujita; Akifumi Ogawa; Akinori Hayashi; Raishi Ichikawa; Yuji Kamata; Akihiro Takeuchi; Koji Takano; Masayoshi Shichiri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Evaluation of Acridine Orange Staining for a Semi-Automated Urinalysis Microscopic Examination at the Point-of-Care.

Authors:  Amy J Powless; Sandra P Prieto; Madison R Gramling; Roxanna J Conley; Gregory G Holley; Timothy J Muldoon
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-18

9.  High false positive rate of white blood cells in urine samples of pregnant women may be caused by epithelial cells being misclassified by the sysmex UF-1000i urine flow cytometer.

Authors:  Wei Yang; Xiaochen Yu; Dan Liu; Xiuru Guan
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.058

10.  Increased effectiveness of urinalysis testing via the integration of automated instrumentation, the lean management approach, and autoverification.

Authors:  Preechaya Wongkrajang; Kanit Reesukumal; Busadee Pratumvinit
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 2.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.