Literature DB >> 21087929

The intra-S phase checkpoint protein Tof1 collaborates with the helicase Rrm3 and the F-box protein Dia2 to maintain genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Narendra K Bairwa1, Bidyut K Mohanty, Radostina Stamenova, M Joan Curcio, Deepak Bastia.   

Abstract

The intra-S phase checkpoint protein complex Tof1/Csm3 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae antagonizes Rrm3 helicase to modulate replication fork arrest not only at the replication termini of rDNA but also at strong nonhistone protein binding sites throughout the genome. We investigated whether these checkpoint proteins acted either antagonistically or synergistically with Rrm3 in mediating other important functions such as maintenance of genome stability. High retromobility of a normally quiescent retrovirus-like transposable element Ty1 of S. cerevisiae is a form of genome instability, because the transposition events induce mutations. We measured the transposition of Ty1 in various genetic backgrounds and discovered that Tof1 suppressed excessive retromobility in collaboration with either Rrm3 or the F-box protein Dia2. Although both Rrm3 and Dia2 are believed to facilitate fork movement, fork stalling at DNA-protein complexes did not appear to be a major contributor to enhancement of retromobility. Absence of the aforementioned proteins either individually or in pair-wise combinations caused karyotype changes as revealed by the altered migrations of the individual chromosomes in pulsed field gels. The mobility changes were RNase H-resistant and therefore, unlikely to have been caused by extensive R loop formation. These mutations also resulted in alterations of telomere lengths. However, the latter changes could not fully account for the magnitude of the observed karyotypic alterations. We conclude that unlike other checkpoint proteins that are known to be required for elevated retromobility, Tof1 suppressed high frequency retrotransposition and maintained karyotype stability in collaboration with the aforementioned proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21087929      PMCID: PMC3024738          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.189456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  44 in total

Review 1.  The take and give between retrotransposable elements and their hosts.

Authors:  Arthur Beauregard; M Joan Curcio; Marlene Belfort
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 16.830

2.  The Tof1p-Csm3p protein complex counteracts the Rrm3p helicase to control replication termination of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Bidyut K Mohanty; Narendra K Bairwa; Deepak Bastia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Hos2 and Set3 promote integration of Ty1 retrotransposons at tRNA genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Zhongming Mou; Alison E Kenny; M Joan Curcio
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-01-16       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Contrasting roles of checkpoint proteins as recombination modulators at Fob1-Ter complexes with or without fork arrest.

Authors:  Bidyut K Mohanty; Narendra K Bairwa; Deepak Bastia
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2009-02-20

5.  S-phase checkpoint pathways stimulate the mobility of the retrovirus-like transposon Ty1.

Authors:  M Joan Curcio; Alison E Kenny; Sharon Moore; David J Garfinkel; Matthew Weintraub; Eric R Gamache; Derek T Scholes
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-10-08       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  A DNA integrity network in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Xuewen Pan; Ping Ye; Daniel S Yuan; Xiaoling Wang; Joel S Bader; Jef D Boeke
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Mec1/Tel1 phosphorylation of the INO80 chromatin remodeling complex influences DNA damage checkpoint responses.

Authors:  Ashby J Morrison; Jung-Ae Kim; Maria D Person; Jessica Highland; Jing Xiao; Tammy S Wehr; Sean Hensley; Yunhe Bao; Jianjun Shen; Sean R Collins; Jonathan S Weissman; Jeff Delrow; Nevan J Krogan; James E Haber; Xuetong Shen
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Rrm3 protects the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome from instability at nascent sites of retrotransposition.

Authors:  Radostina Stamenova; Patrick H Maxwell; Alison E Kenny; M Joan Curcio
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Mrc1, Tof1 and Csm3 inhibit CAG.CTG repeat instability by at least two mechanisms.

Authors:  David F Razidlo; Robert S Lahue
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-03-05

10.  Evaluation of paired-end sequencing strategies for detection of genome rearrangements in cancer.

Authors:  Ali Bashir; Stanislav Volik; Colin Collins; Vineet Bafna; Benjamin J Raphael
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  9 in total

1.  Bacterial and Eukaryotic Replisome Machines.

Authors:  Nina Yao; Mike O'Donnell
Journal:  JSM Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2016-05-30

2.  Epigenetic regulation of the X-chromosomal macrosatellite repeat encoding for the cancer/testis gene CT47.

Authors:  Judit Balog; Dan Miller; Elena Sanchez-Curtailles; Jose Carbo-Marques; Gregory Block; Marco Potman; Peter de Knijff; Richard J L F Lemmers; Stephen J Tapscott; Silvère M van der Maarel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Dia2 controls transcription by mediating assembly of the RSC complex.

Authors:  Edward J Andress; Roman Holic; Mariola J Edelmann; Benedikt M Kessler; Veronica P C C Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Fork pausing complex engages topoisomerases at the replisome.

Authors:  Maksym Shyian; Benjamin Albert; Andreja Moset Zupan; Vitalii Ivanitsa; Gabriel Charbonnet; Daniel Dilg; David Shore
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Coordinated degradation of replisome components ensures genome stability upon replication stress in the absence of the replication fork protection complex.

Authors:  Laura C Roseaulin; Chiaki Noguchi; Esteban Martinez; Melissa A Ziegler; Takashi Toda; Eishi Noguchi
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 5.917

6.  Mcm2 phosphorylation and the response to replicative stress.

Authors:  Brent E Stead; Christopher J Brandl; Matthew K Sandre; Megan J Davey
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 2.797

7.  Binding of Multiple Rap1 Proteins Stimulates Chromosome Breakage Induction during DNA Replication.

Authors:  Greicy H Goto; Sevil Zencir; Yukinori Hirano; Hiroo Ogi; Andreas Ivessa; Katsunori Sugimoto
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Swi1Timeless Prevents Repeat Instability at Fission Yeast Telomeres.

Authors:  Mariana C Gadaleta; Mukund M Das; Hideki Tanizawa; Ya-Ting Chang; Ken-ichi Noma; Toru M Nakamura; Eishi Noguchi
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 9.  Yeast Genome Maintenance by the Multifunctional PIF1 DNA Helicase Family.

Authors:  Julius Muellner; Kristina H Schmidt
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.096

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.