Literature DB >> 21087745

Outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with both Edwards-SAPIEN and CoreValve devices in a single center: the Milan experience.

Cosmo Godino1, Francesco Maisano, Matteo Montorfano, Azeem Latib, Alaide Chieffo, Iassen Michev, Rasha Al-Lamee, Marta Bande, Marco Mussardo, Francesco Arioli, Alfonso Ielasi, Micaela Cioni, Maurizio Taramasso, Irina Arendar, Antonio Grimaldi, Pietro Spagnolo, Alberto Zangrillo, Giovanni La Canna, Ottavio Alfieri, Antonio Colombo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to assess clinical outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) performed with the 2 commercially available valves with 3 delivery approaches selected in a stepwise fashion.
BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on the results of a comprehensive TAVI program using different valves with transfemoral, transapical, and transaxillary approaches for treatment of severe aortic stenosis.
METHODS: We report 30-day and 6-month outcomes of high-risk patients consecutively treated in a single center with either the Medtronic-CoreValve (MCV) (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) or Edwards-SAPIEN valve (ESV) (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) delivered via the transfemoral or transaxillary approaches and ESV via the transapical approach.
RESULTS: A total of 137 patients underwent TAVI: 107 via transfemoral (46 MCV and 61 ESV), 15 via transaxillary (12 MCV and 3 ESV), and 15 via transapical approach. After the transfemoral approach, the procedural success rate was 93.5%, and major vascular complication rate was 20.6%. No intra-procedural deaths occurred. The procedural success rates of transapical and transaxillary approaches were 86.6% and 93.3%, respectively. The 30-day mortality rate was 0.9% in transfemoral group and 13.3% in transapical, and no deaths occurred after transaxillary access. Cumulative death rate at 6 months was 12.2% in transfemoral, 26.6% in transapical, and 18.2% in transaxillary groups. At multivariable analysis, logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation, body surface area, and history of cerebrovascular disease were significantly associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine TAVI using both MCV and ESV with a selection of approaches is feasible and allows treatment of a wide range of patients with good overall procedural success rates and 30-day and 6-month outcomes.
Copyright © 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21087745     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  21 in total

1.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with Core Valve: first Indian experience of three high surgical risk patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Ashok Seth; Vishal Rastogi; Vijay Kumar; Syed Maqbool; Arif Mustaqueem; V Ravi Sekar
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2013-07-09

2.  A systematic review of transapical aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Mohammad Rahnavardi; Jaime Santibanez; Karan Sian; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

3.  Transcatheter resection of the native aortic valve prior to endovalve implantation - A rational approach to reduce TAVI-induced complications.

Authors:  Parla Astarci; Pierre-Yves Etienne; Benoit Raucent; Xavier Bollen; Kahn Tranduy; David Glineur; Laurent Dekerchove; Philippe Noirhomme; Gébrine Elkhoury
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

Review 4.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in bicuspid anatomy.

Authors:  Zhen-Gang Zhao; Hasan Jilaihawi; Yuan Feng; Mao Chen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 5.  TAVI 2012: state of the art.

Authors:  Jochen Reinöhl; Constantin von Zur Mühlen; Martin Moser; Stefan Sorg; Christoph Bode; Manfred Zehender
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  A prospective, non-randomized comparison of SAPIEN XT and CoreValve implantation in two sequential cohorts of patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Albert Markus Kasel; Salvatore Cassese; Thomas Ischinger; Alexander Leber; Diethmar Antoni; Gotthard Riess; Jayshree Vogel; Adnan Kastrati; Walter Eichinger; Ellen Hoffmann
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2014-06-28

Review 7.  Percutaneous management of vascular access in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Ilaria Dato; Francesco Burzotta; Carlo Trani; Filippo Crea; Gian Paolo Ussia
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-26

8.  Echocardiographic outcomes of self-expandable CoreValve versus balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN XT valves: the comparison of two bioprosthesis implanted in a single centre.

Authors:  Dayimi Kaya; Zulkif Tanriverdi; Huseyin Dursun; Tugce Colluoglu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  Assessment and management of aortic valve disease in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  Mackram F Eleid; Sunil Mankad; Paul Sorajja
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.214

10.  Atrial Fibrillation is Associated with Increased Pacemaker Implantation Rates in the Placement of AoRTic Transcatheter Valve (PARTNER) Trial.

Authors:  Angelo B Biviano; Tamim Nazif; Jose Dizon; Hasan Garan; Mark Abrams; Jessica Fleitman; Dua Hassan; Samir Kapadia; Vasilis Babaliaros; Ke Xu; Josep Rodes-Cabau; Wilson Y Szeto; William F Fearon; Danny Dvir; Todd Dewey; Mathew Williams; Steven Kindsvater; Michael J Mack; John G Webb; D Craig Miller; Craig R Smith; Martin B Leon; Susheel Kodali
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2017-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.