Literature DB >> 21087317

Sinus floor augmentation using large (1-2 mm) or small (0.25-1 mm) bovine bone mineral particles: a prospective, intra-individual controlled clinical, micro-computerized tomography and histomorphometric study.

Tali Chackartchi1, Giovana Iezzi, Moshe Goldstein, Avigdor Klinger, Aubrey Soskolne, Adriano Piattelli, Lior Shapira.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the amount of newly formed bone after sinus floor augmentation with two different particle sizes of bovine bone mineral (BBM) using clinical, micro-computerized tomography (CT) and histological techniques.
METHODS: Bilateral sinus floor augmentations were performed in 10 patients. Six to 9 months later, bone samples were retrieved and analyzed.
RESULTS:
Results: Both groups were not different in vertical bone height achieved after augmentation, post-operative complications and maximal torque for the insertion of implants. Micro-CT measurements could not detect a statistically significant difference in bone volume between the groups (with a tendency for new more bone in the small granules group). Histomorphometric analysis revealed that both granule sizes produced the same pattern of bone formation, surrounding the graft granules, and producing a shape of a network, "bridging" between the BBM particles. Multi-nucleated giant cells, probably osteoclasts, were observed directly on the BBM particle surface in both groups. The osteoclast-like cells preferred the small-size BBM particles and not the large particles both in the small-size and the large-size granules group.
CONCLUSION: Both sizes of BBM granules preformed equally and achieved the aim of the sinus floor augmentation procedure clinically and histologically.
© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21087317     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02032.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  14 in total

1.  Effect of pulverized natural bone mineral on regeneration of three-wall intrabony defects. A preclinical study.

Authors:  A Ivanovic; D D Bosshardt; I Mihatovic; F Schwarz; R Gruber; A Sculean
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-08-25       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparison of Material-mediated Bone Regeneration Capacities of Sintered and Non-sintered Xenogeneic Bone Substitutes via 2D and 3D Data.

Authors:  Eleni Kapogianni; Mike Barbeck; Tim Fienitz; Daniel Rothamel; Ole Jung; Aylin Arslan; Lennart Kuhnel; Xin Xiong; Rumen Krastev; Reinhard E. Friedrich; Reinhard Schnettler
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Effect of amount of biomaterial used for maxillary sinus lift on volume maintenance of grafts.

Authors:  Luciene-Dornas Mendes; Roberta-Paula-Colen Bustamante; Bruno-César-Ladeira Vidigal; Mario-Nazareno Favato; Flávio-Ricardo Manzi; Mauricio-Greco Cosso; Elton-Gonçalves Zenóbio
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-09-01

4.  Microcomputed tomographic analysis of bone microarchitecture after sinus augmentation with hyaluronic matrix: a case-control study.

Authors:  Ezgi Gurbuz; Erhan Dursun; Alper Vatansever; Feriha Caglayan
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-09-18

Review 5.  Histological and Biological Response to Different Types of Biomaterials: A Narrative Single Research Center Experience over Three Decades.

Authors:  Margherita Tumedei; Eitan Mijiritsky; Carlos Fernando Mourão; Adriano Piattelli; Marco Degidi; Carlo Mangano; Giovanna Iezzi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Bone formation with two types of grafting materials: a histologic and histomorphometric study.

Authors:  Amir Reza Rokn; Mohammad Amin Khodadoostan; Amir Ali Reza Rasouli Ghahroudi; Puria Motahhary; Mohammad Javad Kharrazi Fard; Hugo De Bruyn; Rose Afzalifar; Ehsan Soolar; Ahmad Soolari
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2011-07-07

7.  A prospective study on the effectiveness of newly developed autogenous tooth bone graft material for sinus bone graft procedure.

Authors:  Sang-Ho Jun; Jin-Soo Ahn; Jae-Il Lee; Kyo-Jin Ahn; Pil-Young Yun; Young-Kyun Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Osteoconductivity of Bovine Xenograft Granules of Different Sizes in Sinus Lift: A Histomorphometric Study in Rabbits.

Authors:  Eduardo Pires Godoy; Karol Alí Apaza Alccayhuaman; Daniele Botticelli; Andrea Amaroli; Vitor Ferreira Balan; Erick Ricardo Silva; Samuel Porfirio Xavier
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-31

9.  The impact of the size of bone substitute granules on macrophage and osteoblast behaviors in vitro.

Authors:  Masako Fujioka-Kobayashi; Hiroki Katagiri; Michihide Kono; Benoit Schaller; Tateyuki Iizuka; Ali-Farid Safi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Microarchitecture of the Augmented Bone Following Sinus Elevation with an Albumin Impregnated Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (BoneAlbumin) versus Anorganic Bovine Bone Mineral: A Randomized Prospective Clinical, Histomorphometric, and Micro-Computed Tomography Study.

Authors:  Kivovics Márton; Szabó Bence Tamás; Németh Orsolya; Czinkóczky Béla; Dőri Ferenc; Nagy Péter; Dobó-Nagy Csaba; Csönge Lajos; Lacza Zsombor; Mijiritsky Eitan; Szabó György
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-28       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.