Thomas V Perneger1, Delphine S Courvoisier. 1. Division of Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. Thomas.Perneger@hcuge.ch
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Measurement of health utility is important for quality improvement, but instruments vary in their content. Multi-attribute health utility measures typically assess a small number of health problems, e.g. the EuroQoL EQ-5D questionnaire explores five dimensions of health. We aimed to examine whether a small number of dimensions explains a sufficient amount of variance in self-perceived health, and what can be gained from adding additional dimensions. DESIGN: Cross-sectional mail survey that explored health utility and self-perceived health. SETTING: General resident population of French-speaking Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: Non-institutionalized adults. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: EQ-5D (which measures mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression and a visual analogue health scale between 0 and 100 (VAS)). A subsample rated five additional health dimensions (sleep, memory/concentration, energy/fatigue, sight/hearing, contacts with others). RESULTS: In total, 349 adults returned the extended 10-item questionnaire. All added items were strongly and significantly associated with the VAS for perceived health. The proportion of variance explained (R(2)) in the VAS was 0.47 for the original EQ-5D items (adjusted for attenuation: 0.65), 0.47 for the new items (adjusted for attenuation: 0.65) and 0.56 for the 10 items together (adjusted for attenuation: 0.78). Forty-four percent of the respondents who had a perfect health utility on the EQ-5D reported at least one problem in the new health dimensions. CONCLUSION: Self-perceived health among the general public is influenced by more health dimensions than are typically measured in a multi-attribute health-utility instrument.
OBJECTIVE: Measurement of health utility is important for quality improvement, but instruments vary in their content. Multi-attribute health utility measures typically assess a small number of health problems, e.g. the EuroQoL EQ-5D questionnaire explores five dimensions of health. We aimed to examine whether a small number of dimensions explains a sufficient amount of variance in self-perceived health, and what can be gained from adding additional dimensions. DESIGN: Cross-sectional mail survey that explored health utility and self-perceived health. SETTING: General resident population of French-speaking Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: Non-institutionalized adults. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: EQ-5D (which measures mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression and a visual analogue health scale between 0 and 100 (VAS)). A subsample rated five additional health dimensions (sleep, memory/concentration, energy/fatigue, sight/hearing, contacts with others). RESULTS: In total, 349 adults returned the extended 10-item questionnaire. All added items were strongly and significantly associated with the VAS for perceived health. The proportion of variance explained (R(2)) in the VAS was 0.47 for the original EQ-5D items (adjusted for attenuation: 0.65), 0.47 for the new items (adjusted for attenuation: 0.65) and 0.56 for the 10 items together (adjusted for attenuation: 0.78). Forty-four percent of the respondents who had a perfect health utility on the EQ-5D reported at least one problem in the new health dimensions. CONCLUSION: Self-perceived health among the general public is influenced by more health dimensions than are typically measured in a multi-attribute health-utility instrument.
Authors: Krittaphas Kangwanrattanakul; Cynthia R Gross; Montaya Sunantiwat; Montarat Thavorncharoensap Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2018-12-05 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Thomas V Perneger; Angèle Gayet-Ageron; Delphine S Courvoisier; Thomas Agoritsas; Stéphane Cullati Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2013-04-25 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: A J L M Geraerds; Suzanne Polinder; Inge Spronk; Alfons G M Olde Loohuis; Annemieke de Groot; Madelon B Bronner; Juanita A Haagsma Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2022-01-29 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Baris Gencer; Nicolas Rodondi; Reto Auer; David Nanchen; Lorenz Räber; Roland Klingenberg; Mark Pletscher; Peter Jüni; Stephan Windecker; Christian M Matter; Thomas F Lüscher; François Mach; Thomas V Perneger; François R Girardin Journal: Open Heart Date: 2016-05-23