Literature DB >> 30519906

Exploration of a cultural-adaptation of the EQ-5D for Thai population: A "bolt-on" experiment.

Krittaphas Kangwanrattanakul1,2, Cynthia R Gross3, Montaya Sunantiwat1, Montarat Thavorncharoensap4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: As the EQ-5D was developed in western countries with only five dimensions, it might be insensitive to non-western populations including Thai. This study examined the impact of adding two candidate dimensions, "interpersonal relationships (IR)" and "activities related to bending knees (AK)," to the EQ-5D questionnaire, and evaluated their psychometric properties in a Thai population sample.
METHODS: Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 600 Thai. Ceiling effect for the EQ-5D and the EQ-5D-5L+AK+IR were compared. Spearman's rho correlation was used to determine whether the two new dimensions were redundant with the existing EQ-5D dimensions. Correlations between the two dimensions and similar dimensions of the SF-36v2 were also assessed. Hierarchical multiple regression was performed to evaluate the incremental value of the EQ-5D-5L+AK+IR over the EQ-5D in predicting VAS scores.
RESULTS: The two new dimensions were not redundant with the existing five dimensions of the EQ-5D. The highest correlation (0.371) was found between MO and AK. The overall ceiling effect decreased by 5% (50.5-45.5%) when using the EQ-5D-5L+AK+IR. Moderate correlations were found between the candidate dimensions and similar dimensions of the SF-36v2. Multiple regression indicated that adding AK (adjusted r2 0.329 vs. 0.306) but not IR (adjusted r2 0.307 vs. 0.306) significantly increased ability to predict VAS scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results suggested that AK holds promise for making the EQ-5D more relevant to Thai while it is premature to conclude on the impact of IR. Nevertheless, more work is required to carefully assess the value of the new dimensions as well as the trade-off for the modification.

Keywords:  Bolt-on; Culture; EQ-5D; Health-related quality of life; Psychometric properties

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30519906     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-018-2072-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  33 in total

Review 1.  A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments.

Authors:  S J Coons; S Rao; D L Keininger; R D Hays
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Visual analog scales, standard gambles, and relative risk aversion.

Authors:  A Robinson; G Loomes; M Jones-Lee
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Cultural factors influencing the mental health of Asian Americans.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Kramer; Kenny Kwong; Evelyn Lee; Henry Chung
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2002-09

4.  The determinants of self-reported health-related quality of life in a culturally and socially diverse South African community.

Authors:  Jennifer Jelsma; Gillian Ferguson
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2004-04-16       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 5.  EuroQol: the current state of play.

Authors:  R Brooks
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  What health domains and items are important to patients with knee osteoarthritis? A focus group study in a multiethnic urban Asian population.

Authors:  F Xie; S-C Li; K-Y Fong; N-N Lo; S-J Yeo; K-Y Yang; J Thumboo
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  The health status of the Dutch population as assessed by the EQ-6D.

Authors:  N Hoeymans; H van Lindert; G P Westert
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Dimensions of quality of life for Chinese adults with spinal cord injury: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Nan Zhang Hampton; Desirée Baolian Qin-Hilliard
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 3.033

9.  Developing health-related quality-of-life instruments for use in Asia: the issues.

Authors:  Yin Bun Cheung; Julian Thumboo
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  3 in total

1.  Perceptions of the General Public About Health-related Quality of Life and the EQ-5D Questionnaire: A Qualitative Study in Korea.

Authors:  Minsu Ock; Jeehee Pyo; Min-Woo Jo; Michael Herdman; Nan Luo
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2022-05-31

2.  The remarkably frequent use of EQ-5D in non-economic research.

Authors:  Aimin Wang; Kim Rand; Zhihao Yang; Richard Brooks; Jan Busschbach
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-11-30

3.  Factors contributing to the ceiling effect of the EQ-5D-5L: an analysis of patients with prostate cancer judged "no-problems".

Authors:  Hideki Murasawa; Takayuki Sugiyama; Yuki Matsuoka; Takashi Okabe; Yoshiaki Wakumoto; Nobumichi Tanaka; Mikio Sugimoto; Masafumi Oyama; Kiyohide Fujimoto; Shigeo Horie; Masaru Funagoshi; Ichiro Arakawa; Shinichi Noto; Kojiro Shimozuma
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 4.147

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.