Literature DB >> 21084224

Cost-effectiveness study comparing pharmaceutically licensed plasma for transfusion (OctaplasLG®) versus fresh frozen plasma (FFP) in critically Ill patients in the UK.

Margreet C van Eerd1, J N Mario Ouwens2, Maria A de Peuter2.   

Abstract

This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of OctaplasLG® (pharmaceutically licensed plasma for transfusion) versus fresh frozen plasma (FFP) in critically ill patients in the UK using a decision-analytic approach. Transfusion with OctaplasLG® resulted in 0.03 quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and 0.03 life years saved compared with FFP. The discounted cost per life year was £949 ($1504), and the discounted cost per QALY saved was £1030 ($1632) with OctaplasLG® in the UK. Based on a higher price of £70 ($111) for OctaplasLG® versus £28.42 ($45.04) for FFP, OctaplasLG® is considered to be cost-effective at a threshold of £30,000 ($47,548) per QALY.
Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21084224     DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2010.09.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfus Apher Sci        ISSN: 1473-0502            Impact factor:   1.764


  6 in total

Review 1.  Is solvent/detergent plasma better than standard fresh-frozen plasma? A systematic review and an expert consensus document.

Authors:  Marco Marietta; Massimo Franchini; M Lucia Bindi; Francesco Picardi; Matteo Ruggeri; Giustina De Silvestro
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 2.  Health Technology Assessment of pathogen reduction technologies applied to plasma for clinical use.

Authors:  Americo Cicchetti; Alexandra Berrino; Marina Casini; Paola Codella; Giuseppina Facco; Alessandra Fiore; Giuseppe Marano; Marco Marchetti; Emanuela Midolo; Roberta Minacori; Pietro Refolo; Federica Romano; Matteo Ruggeri; Dario Sacchini; Antonio G Spagnolo; Irene Urbina; Stefania Vaglio; Giuliano Grazzini; Giancarlo M Liumbruno
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Avatrombopag and lusutrombopag for thrombocytopenia in people with chronic liver disease needing an elective procedure: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Nigel Armstrong; Nasuh Büyükkaramikli; Hannah Penton; Rob Riemsma; Pim Wetzelaer; Vanesa Huertas Carrera; Stephanie Swift; Thea Drachen; Heike Raatz; Steve Ryder; Dhwani Shah; Titas Buksnys; Gill Worthy; Steven Duffy; Maiwenn Al; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  Solvent/detergent plasma: pharmaceutical characteristics and clinical experience.

Authors:  Giancarlo Maria Liumbruno; Massimo Franchini
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of lusutrombopag for thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic liver disease in Japan.

Authors:  Norikane Miki; Sachie Inoue; Hidetoshi Shibahara; Kenji Kurazono; Rodolphe Perard; Ryosuke Tateishi
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2021-06-26

Review 6.  Comprehensive US government program for dried plasma development.

Authors:  Anthony E Pusateri; Michael B Given; Victor W Macdonald; Mary J Homer
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.157

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.