Literature DB >> 21083825

Comparison of bacterial culture and real-time PCR for the detection of Salmonella in grow-finish pigs in Western Canada using a Bayesian approach.

W Wilkins1, C Waldner, A Rajić, M McFall, A Muckle, R C Mainar-Jaime.   

Abstract

The study objective was to evaluate the accuracy of a real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and a culture protocol used to detect Salmonella in the faeces of grow-finish pigs using a Bayesian approach. The RT-PCR was invA-gene-based assay, while the culture protocol included pre-enrichment in buffered peptone water, selective enrichment in tetrathionate and Rappaport-Vassiliadis broths, and isolation on semi-solid (modified semi-solid RV) or solid (XLT4, Rambach) agar plates. Bayesian analysis was performed using a two-test, two-population model with dependence between culture and RT-PCR and compared to a second model with conditional independence between these two tests. Two hundred and ninety three individual faecal and 294 pooled pen samples from grow-finish pig collected from 10 farms were tested and results were divided into two groups according to herd size (five herds <250 sows, five herds with >400 sows). In the dependence model, RT-PCR sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) were estimated to be 90% (95% probability interval 74, 97) and 99% (98, 99), respectively. Culture Se was 92% (75, 99), while culture Sp was considered 100% as all culture-positive samples were confirmed by serotyping. In the conditional independence model, RT-PCR Se and Sp, and culture Se, were 96% (93, 98), 99% (98, 100) and 97% (94, 100), respectively. The dependence model resulted in posterior estimates of Se that were lower and with broader probability intervals than the independence model, indicating that when RT-PCR and culture are evaluated relative to each other, the correlation between these tests is an important source of bias and should be adjusted for during analysis. The RT-PCR evaluated in this study performed almost comparably to culture; given the cost savings associated with using this test and more timely results, the RT-PCR may be a useful alternative to culture for screening large numbers of samples, particularly when Salmonella prevalence is low.
© 2010 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21083825     DOI: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01365.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health        ISSN: 1863-1959            Impact factor:   2.702


  5 in total

1.  Pathogenicity of Salmonella strains isolated from egg shells and the layer farm environment in australia.

Authors:  Andrea R McWhorter; Dianne Davos; K K Chousalkar
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Dynamics of Salmonella Shedding and Welfare of Hens in Free-Range Egg Production Systems.

Authors:  Vaibhav C Gole; Rebecca Woodhouse; Charles Caraguel; Talia Moyle; Jean-Loup Rault; Margaret Sexton; Kapil Chousalkar
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Development of a qPCR for the detection and quantification of Salmonella spp. in sheep feces and tissues.

Authors:  Alysia M Parker; Virginia L Mohler; Alison A Gunn; John K House
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 1.279

4.  Sensitivity of the ISO 6579:2002/Amd 1:2007 standard method for detection of Salmonella spp. on mesenteric lymph nodes from slaughter pigs.

Authors:  R C Mainar-Jaime; S Andrés; J P Vico; B San Román; V Garrido; M J Grilló
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Development of a sensitive and specific qPCR assay in conjunction with propidium monoazide for enhanced detection of live Salmonella spp. in food.

Authors:  Baoguang Li; Jin-Qiang Chen
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 3.605

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.