Literature DB >> 23100334

Sensitivity of the ISO 6579:2002/Amd 1:2007 standard method for detection of Salmonella spp. on mesenteric lymph nodes from slaughter pigs.

R C Mainar-Jaime1, S Andrés, J P Vico, B San Román, V Garrido, M J Grilló.   

Abstract

The ISO 6579:2002/Amd 1:2007 (ISO) standard has been the bacteriological standard method used in the European Union for the detection of Salmonella spp. in pig mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN), but there are no published estimates of the diagnostic sensitivity (Se) of the method in this matrix. Here, the Se of the ISO (Se(ISO)) was estimated on 675 samples selected from two populations with different Salmonella prevalences (14 farms with a ≥ 20% prevalence and 13 farms with a <20% prevalence) and through the use of latent-class models in concert with Bayesian inference, assuming 100% ISO specificity, and an invA-based PCR as the second diagnostic method. The Se(ISO) was estimated to be close to 87%, while the sensitivity of the PCR reached up to 83.6% and its specificity was 97.4%. Interestingly, the bacteriological reanalysis of 33 potential false-negative (PCR-positive) samples allowed isolation of 19 (57.5%) new Salmonella strains, improving the overall diagnostic accuracy of the bacteriology. Considering the usual limitations of bacteriology regarding Se, these results support the adequacy of the ISO for the detection of Salmonella spp. from MLN and also that of the PCR-based method as an alternative or complementary (screening) test for the diagnosis of pig salmonellosis, particularly considering the cost and time benefits of the molecular procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23100334      PMCID: PMC3536256          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02099-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  30 in total

Review 1.  Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests and disease prevalence when the true disease state is unknown.

Authors:  C Enøe; M P Georgiadis; W O Johnson
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2000-05-30       Impact factor: 2.670

2.  Relationship between sample weight, homogeneity, and sensitivity of fecal culture for Salmonella enterica.

Authors:  Rob M Cannon; Terry J Nicholls
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.279

3.  The effect of fecal sample weight on detection of Salmonella enterica in swine feces.

Authors:  J A Funk; P R Davies; M A Nichols
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.279

4.  Multicenter validation of the analytical accuracy of Salmonella PCR: towards an international standard.

Authors:  Burkhard Malorny; Jeffrey Hoorfar; Cornelia Bunge; Reiner Helmuth
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Improved culture methods for isolation of Salmonella organisms from swine feces.

Authors:  J Hoorfar; A V Mortensen
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.156

6.  Influence of enrichment media and application of a PCR based method to detect Salmonella in poultry industry products and clinical samples.

Authors:  I S Schrank; M A Mores; J L Costa; A P Frazzon; R Soncini; A Schrank; M H Vainstein; S C Silva
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2001-09-03       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Comparison of cultivation and PCR-hybridization for detection of Salmonella in porcine fecal and water samples.

Authors:  I Feder; J C Nietfeld; J Galland; T Yeary; J M Sargeant; R Oberst; M L Tamplin; J B Luchansky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of methods for isolating Salmonella bacteria from faeces of naturally infected pigs.

Authors:  P R Davies; P K Turkson; J A Funk; M A Nichols; S R Ladely; P J Fedorka-Cray
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  Comparison of a real-time PCR method with a culture method for the detection of Salmonella enterica serotype enteritidis in naturally contaminated environmental samples from integrated poultry houses.

Authors:  Bwalya Lungu; W Douglas Waltman; Roy D Berghaus; Charles L Hofacre
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.077

10.  Evaluation of the specificity of Salmonella PCR primers using various intestinal bacterial species.

Authors:  C J Ziemer; S R Steadham
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.858

View more
  10 in total

1.  A Fibre- vs. cereal grain-based diet: Which is better for horse welfare? Effects on intestinal permeability, muscle characteristics and oxidative status in horses reared for meat production.

Authors:  Federica Raspa; Francesca Rita Dinardo; Ingrid Vervuert; Domenico Bergero; Maria Teresa Bottero; Daniele Pattono; Alessandra Dalmasso; Marica Vinassa; Ermenegildo Valvassori; Elena Bruno; Pasquale De Palo; Emanuela Valle
Journal:  J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl)       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 2.718

2.  The effect of anaerobic digestion and storage on indicator microorganisms in swine and dairy manure.

Authors:  Annamaria Costa; Claudia Gusmara; Davide Gardoni; Mauro Zaninelli; Fulvia Tambone; Vittorio Sala; Marcella Guarino
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  House Sparrows Do Not Constitute a Significant Salmonella Typhimurium Reservoir across Urban Gradients in Flanders, Belgium.

Authors:  Lieze Oscar Rouffaer; Luc Lens; Roel Haesendonck; Aimeric Teyssier; Noraine Salleh Hudin; Diederik Strubbe; Freddy Haesebrouck; Frank Pasmans; An Martel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Rapid Molecular Approach for Simultaneous Detection of Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., and Vibrio cholera.

Authors:  Reza Ranjbar; Ali Naghoni; Davoud Afshar; Farhad Nikkhahi; Mohsen Mohammadi
Journal:  Osong Public Health Res Perspect       Date:  2016-11-05

5.  An investigation of dairy calf management practices, colostrum quality, failure of transfer of passive immunity, and occurrence of enteropathogens among Australian dairy farms.

Authors:  Angel Abuelo; Peter Havrlant; Natalie Wood; Marta Hernandez-Jover
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Association between animal welfare indicators and microbiological quality of beef carcasses, including Salmonella spp., from a slaughterhouse in Ecuador.

Authors:  María Cevallos-Almeida; Ana Burgos-Mayorga; Carlos A Gómez; José Luis Lema-Hurtado; Leydi Lema; Iveth Calvache; Christian Jaramillo; Isabel Collaguazo Ruilova; Evelyn Pamela Martínez; Pamela Estupiñán
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2021-04-16

7.  Bacterial diversity and potential risk factors associated with Salmonella contamination of seafood products sold in retail markets in Bangkok, Thailand.

Authors:  Edward R Atwill; Saharuetai Jeamsripong
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Investigating the prevalence of Salmonella in dogs within the Midlands region of the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Preena Lowden; Corrin Wallis; Nancy Gee; Anthony Hilton
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Development of a sensitive and specific qPCR assay in conjunction with propidium monoazide for enhanced detection of live Salmonella spp. in food.

Authors:  Baoguang Li; Jin-Qiang Chen
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 10.  Presence and Persistence of Salmonella in Water: The Impact on Microbial Quality of Water and Food Safety.

Authors:  Huanli Liu; Chris A Whitehouse; Baoguang Li
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-05-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.