Literature DB >> 21083719

Examining autonomy's boundaries: a follow-up review of perinatal mortality cases in UK independent midwifery.

Andrew Symon1, Clare Winter, Peter T Donnan, Mavis Kirkham.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An earlier matched cohort study in the United Kingdom found a significantly higher perinatal mortality rate for births booked under an independent midwife compared with births in National Health Service units (1.7% [25/1,508] vs 0.6% [45/7,366]). This study examined independent midwives' management and decision making in the 15 instances of perinatal death that occurred at term.
METHODS: Thematic analysis of independent midwives' case notes was performed in instances of perinatal mortality. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the midwives concerned.
RESULTS: Home birth was attempted in 13 of the 15 cases. Significant (often multiple) antenatal risk factors were identified in 13 cases, including twin pregnancy, planned vaginal births after cesarean section, breech presentations, and maternal illness. Several women had declined some or all routine antenatal screening. Three deaths occurred before labor onset. Postmortem results were known in only four cases; many causes of death remained unexplained. Professional consensus was that seven deaths were unpreventable; elective cesarean section may have changed the outcome in eight cases. However, the pregnant women had declined this option; some were reported to be avoiding National Health Service care because of previous bad experiences. Transfer to hospital care, when it occurred, was often problematic. Care management was judged to be clinically acceptable within the parameters set by the mothers' choices.
CONCLUSIONS: Information about clinical processes (and outcomes) is essential if informed decisions are to be made. The women in this review had reportedly accepted the potential consequences of their high-risk situations. If reality is to match rhetoric about "patient" autonomy, such decision making in high-risk situations must be accepted.
© 2010, Copyright the Authors. Journal compilation © 2010, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21083719     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00422.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  8 in total

1.  Autonomy in place of birth: a concept analysis.

Authors:  Berglind Halfdansdottir; Margaret E Wilson; Ingegerd Hildingsson; Olof A Olafsdottir; Alexander Kr Smarason; Herdis Sveinsdottir
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-11

2.  Freebirthing: a case for using interpretative hermeneutic phenomenology in midwifery research for knowledge generation, dissemination and impact.

Authors:  Claire Feeley
Journal:  J Res Nurs       Date:  2019-03-05

3.  Addressing a need. Holistic midwifery in the Netherlands: A qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Martine Hollander; Esteriek de Miranda; Frank Vandenbussche; Jeroen van Dillen; Lianne Holten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Birthing outside the system: the motivation behind the choice to freebirth or have a homebirth with risk factors in Australia.

Authors:  Melanie K Jackson; Virginia Schmied; Hannah G Dahlen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Maternity care providers' perceptions of women's autonomy and the law.

Authors:  Sue Kruske; Kate Young; Bec Jenkinson; Ann Catchlove
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  The Mothers on Respect (MOR) index: measuring quality, safety, and human rights in childbirth.

Authors:  Saraswathi Vedam; Kathrin Stoll; Nicholas Rubashkin; Kelsey Martin; Zoe Miller-Vedam; Hermine Hayes-Klein; Ganga Jolicoeur
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2017-01-19

7.  Women's motivations for choosing a high risk birth setting against medical advice in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Martine Hollander; Esteriek de Miranda; Jeroen van Dillen; Irene de Graaf; Frank Vandenbussche; Lianne Holten
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Towards a better understanding of risk selection in maternal and newborn care: A systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Bahareh Goodarzi; Annika Walker; Lianne Holten; Linda Schoonmade; Pim Teunissen; François Schellevis; Ank de Jonge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.