Literature DB >> 21082295

Dyslexic children show deficits in implicit sequence learning, but not in explicit sequence learning or contextual cueing.

Gracia Jiménez-Fernández1, Joaquín M M Vaquero, Luis Jiménez, Sylvia Defior.   

Abstract

Dyslexia is a specific learning disability characterized by difficulties with accurate and/or fluent word recognition and by poor spelling abilities. The absence of other high level cognitive deficits in the dyslexic population has led some authors to propose that non-strategical processes like implicit learning could be impaired in this population. Most studies have addressed this issue by using sequence learning tasks, but so far the results have not been conclusive. We test this hypothesis by comparing the performance of dyslexic children and good readers in both implicit and explicit versions of the sequence learning task, as well as in another implicit learning task not involving sequential information. The results showed that dyslexic children failed to learn the sequence when they were not informed about its presence (implicit condition). In contrast, they learned without significant differences in relation to the good readers group when they were encouraged to discover the sequence and to use it in order to improve their performance (explicit condition). Moreover, we observed that this implicit learning deficit was not extended to other forms of non-sequential, implicit learning such as contextual cueing. In this case, both groups showed similar implicit learning about the information provided by the visual context. These results help to clarify previous contradictory data, and they are discussed in relation to how the implicit sequence learning deficit could contribute to the understanding of dyslexia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21082295     DOI: 10.1007/s11881-010-0048-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Dyslexia        ISSN: 0736-9387


  17 in total

1.  Implicit learning in children with spelling disability: evidence from artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  Elena Ise; Carolin J Arnoldi; Jürgen Bartling; Gerd Schulte-Körne
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  Statistical Learning, Letter Reversals, and Reading.

Authors:  Rebecca Treiman; Jessica Gordon; Richard Boada; Robin L Peterson; Bruce F Pennington
Journal:  Sci Stud Read       Date:  2014

3.  The Role of Search Speed in the Contextual Cueing of Children's Attention.

Authors:  Kevin Darby; Joseph Burling; Hanako Yoshida
Journal:  Cogn Dev       Date:  2014-01

4.  Atypical predictive processing during visual statistical learning in children with developmental dyslexia: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Sonia Singh; Anne M Walk; Christopher M Conway
Journal:  Ann Dyslexia       Date:  2018-06-15

Review 5.  Cerebellar function in developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  Catherine J Stoodley; John F Stein
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Statistical Learning and Language Impairments: Toward More Precise Theoretical Accounts.

Authors:  Louisa Bogaerts; Noam Siegelman; Ram Frost
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-11-02

7.  History of reading struggles linked to enhanced learning in low spatial frequency scenes.

Authors:  Matthew H Schneps; James R Brockmole; Gerhard Sonnert; Marc Pomplun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Enhanced recognition memory after incidental encoding in children with developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  Martina Hedenius; Michael T Ullman; Per Alm; Margareta Jennische; Jonas Persson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies.

Authors:  Jarrad A G Lum; Michael T Ullman; Gina Conti-Ramsden
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2013-08-06

10.  A Computational Model of Implicit Memory Captures Dyslexics' Perceptual Deficits.

Authors:  Sagi Jaffe-Dax; Ofri Raviv; Nori Jacoby; Yonatan Loewenstein; Merav Ahissar
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.