Literature DB >> 21080772

Disability and occupational assessment: objective diagnosis and quantitative impairment rating.

C Donald Williams.   

Abstract

Industrial insurance originated in Europe in the nineteenth century and replaced the old system of negligence liability in the United States between 1910 and 1940. Today psychiatric disability assessments are performed by psychiatrists in the context of Social Security Disability Insurance applications, workers' compensation claims, private disability insurance claims, and fitness for duty evaluations. Expertise in the performance of psychiatric disability evaluations is required, but general psychiatric residency programs provide experience only with treatment evaluations, which differ fundamentally from independent medical evaluations as to role boundaries and the focus of assessment. Psychiatrists offer opinions regarding psychiatric impairments, but administrative or judicial tribunals make the actual determinations of disability. Social Security Disability Insurance evaluations and workers' compensation evaluations are discussed, as is the distinction between diagnoses, which are categorical, and impairment ratings, which are dimensional. Inconsistency in impairment ratings has been problematic in the United States and elsewhere in the workers' compensation arena. A protocol for achieving more consistent impairment ratings is proposed, one that correlates three commonly used global rating scales in a 3 × 5 grid, supplemented by objective psychological test data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21080772     DOI: 10.3109/10673229.2010.527516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Harv Rev Psychiatry        ISSN: 1067-3229            Impact factor:   3.732


  2 in total

1.  Use of a structured functional evaluation process for independent medical evaluations of claimants presenting with disabling mental illness: rationale and design for a multi-center reliability study.

Authors:  Monica Bachmann; Wout de Boer; Stefan Schandelmaier; Andrea Leibold; Renato Marelli; Joerg Jeger; Ulrike Hoffmann-Richter; Ralph Mager; Heinz Schaad; Thomas Zumbrunn; Nicole Vogel; Oskar Bänziger; Jason W Busse; Katrin Fischer; Regina Kunz
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.630

2.  A new disability rating method according to the job using the Korean Academy of Medical Science disability guideline.

Authors:  Jong-Uk Won; Jay-young Yu; Young-Jun Kwon; Yongkyu Kim; Jeong-Bae Rhie; In-Chul Jeong
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 2.153

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.