Literature DB >> 21080736

A review and critique of studies reporting utility values for schizophrenia-related health states.

Ifigeneia Mavranezouli1.   

Abstract

Economic evaluation of health technologies in the form of cost-utility analysis is increasingly advocated. The most common outcome measure in this type of analysis is the QALY. In order to estimate QALYs, appropriate utility values are required. The objective of this review was to identify and critique utility values for schizophrenia-related health states. A critical appraisal was performed on utility values for schizophrenia identified in the systematic literature review that informed the economic analysis of the updated edition of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) clinical guideline on schizophrenia for England and Wales. Seven studies reporting utility values for schizophrenia were identified. The studies employed a variety of methods for generating utility values. None of the reported sets of utility values for schizophrenia were generated using the EQ-5D, which is a measure widely used in cost-utility analysis and preferred by NICE. Nevertheless, the EQ-5D may be less sensitive in capturing aspects of health-related quality of life in patients with schizophrenia. A condition-specific preference-based instrument may be more appropriate than a generic measure to inform cost-utility analyses of interventions for schizophrenia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21080736     DOI: 10.2165/11537300-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  39 in total

Review 1.  A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation.

Authors:  J Brazier; M Deverill; C Green; R Harper; A Booth
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36.

Authors:  John Brazier; Jennifer Roberts; Mark Deverill
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Differences in health values among patients, family members, and providers for outcomes in schizophrenia.

Authors:  L A Lenert; J Ziegler; T Lee; R Sommi; R Mahmoud
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 4.  EuroQol: the current state of play.

Authors:  R Brooks
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 5.  Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

Authors:  M C Weinstein; J E Siegel; M R Gold; M S Kamlet; L B Russell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Economic and health state utility determinations for schizophrenic patients treated with risperidone or haloperidol.

Authors:  G Chouinard; P S Albright
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.153

7.  Randomised controlled trials of conventional antipsychotic versus new atypical drugs, and new atypical drugs versus clozapine, in people with schizophrenia responding poorly to, or intolerant of, current drug treatment.

Authors:  S W Lewis; L Davies; P B Jones; T R E Barnes; R M Murray; R Kerwin; D Taylor; K P Hayhurst; A Markwick; H Lloyd; G Dunn
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.014

8.  Cost-effectiveness of second-generation antipsychotics and perphenazine in a randomized trial of treatment for chronic schizophrenia.

Authors:  Robert A Rosenheck; Douglas L Leslie; Jody Sindelar; Edward A Miller; Haiqun Lin; T Scott Stroup; Joseph McEvoy; Sonia M Davis; Richard S E Keefe; Marvin Swartz; Diana O Perkins; John K Hsiao; Jeffrey Lieberman
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  Rasch analysis informed the development of a classification system for a diabetes-specific preference-based measure of health.

Authors:  Murali Sundaram; Michael J Smith; Dennis A Revicki; Betsy Elswick; Lesley-Ann Miller
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Cost-utility analysis of treatment with olanzapine compared with other antipsychotic treatments in patients with schizophrenia in the pan-European SOHO study.

Authors:  Martin Knapp; Frank Windmeijer; Jacqueline Brown; Stathis Kontodimas; Spyridon Tzivelekis; Josep Maria Haro; Mark Ratcliffe; Jihyung Hong; Diego Novick
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

View more
  7 in total

1.  Socio-demographic, clinical characteristics and utilization of mental health care services associated with SF-6D utility scores in patients with mental disorders: contributions of the quantile regression.

Authors:  Amélie Prigent; Blaise Kamendje-Tchokobou; Karine Chevreul
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  An economic evaluation of a contingency-management intervention for stimulant use among community mental health patients with serious mental illness.

Authors:  Sean M Murphy; Michael G McDonell; Sterling McPherson; Debra Srebnik; Frank Angelo; John M Roll; Richard K Ries
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 3.  The estimation of utility weights in cost-utility analysis for mental disorders: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Sonntag; Hans-Helmut König; Alexander Konnopka
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Cost-effectiveness of adding cetuximab to platinum-based chemotherapy for first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Malek B Hannouf; Chander Sehgal; Jeffrey Q Cao; Joseph D Mocanu; Eric Winquist; Gregory S Zaric
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Systematic review of utility values used in the pharmacoeconomic evaluations for schizophrenia: implications on cost-effectiveness results.

Authors:  Junwen Zhou; Aurélie Millier; Clément François; Samuel Aballéa; Mondher Toumi
Journal:  J Mark Access Health Policy       Date:  2019-08-22

Review 6.  Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Psychosis: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2018-10-24

7.  Predictive models to estimate utility from clinical questionnaires in schizophrenia: findings from EuroSC.

Authors:  Carole Siani; Christian de Peretti; Aurélie Millier; Laurent Boyer; Mondher Toumi
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 4.147

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.