Literature DB >> 21080181

Genome-wide comparison of paired fresh frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded gliomas by custom BAC and oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization: facilitating analysis of archival gliomas.

Gayatry Mohapatra1, David A Engler, Kristen D Starbuck, James C Kim, Derek C Bernay, George A Scangas, Audrey Rousseau, Tracy T Batchelor, Rebecca A Betensky, David N Louis.   

Abstract

Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) is a powerful tool for detecting DNA copy number alterations (CNA). Because diffuse malignant gliomas are often sampled by small biopsies, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks are often the only tissue available for genetic analysis; FFPE tissues are also needed to study the intratumoral heterogeneity that characterizes these neoplasms. In this paper, we present a combination of evaluations and technical advances that provide strong support for the ready use of oligonucleotide aCGH on FFPE diffuse gliomas. We first compared aCGH using bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) arrays in 45 paired frozen and FFPE gliomas, and demonstrate a high concordance rate between FFPE and frozen DNA in an individual clone-level analysis of sensitivity and specificity, assuring that under certain array conditions, frozen and FFPE DNA can perform nearly identically. However, because oligonucleotide arrays offer advantages to BAC arrays in genomic coverage and practical availability, we next developed a method of labeling DNA from FFPE tissue that allows efficient hybridization to oligonucleotide arrays. To demonstrate utility in FFPE tissues, we applied this approach to biphasic anaplastic oligoastrocytomas and demonstrate CNA differences between DNA obtained from the two components. Therefore, BAC and oligonucleotide aCGH can be sensitive and specific tools for detecting CNAs in FFPE DNA, and novel labeling techniques enable the routine use of oligonucleotide arrays for FFPE DNA. In combination, these advances should facilitate genome-wide analysis of rare, small and/or histologically heterogeneous gliomas from FFPE tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21080181      PMCID: PMC3059338          DOI: 10.1007/s00401-010-0773-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neuropathol        ISSN: 0001-6322            Impact factor:   17.088


  45 in total

1.  Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of array-based DNA copy number data.

Authors:  Adam B Olshen; E S Venkatraman; Robert Lucito; Michael Wigler
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Detection of multiple gains and losses of genetic material in ten glioma cell lines by comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  G Mohapatra; D H Kim; B G Feuerstein
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  Identification of a CpG island methylator phenotype that defines a distinct subgroup of glioma.

Authors:  Houtan Noushmehr; Daniel J Weisenberger; Kristin Diefes; Heidi S Phillips; Kanan Pujara; Benjamin P Berman; Fei Pan; Christopher E Pelloski; Erik P Sulman; Krishna P Bhat; Roel G W Verhaak; Katherine A Hoadley; D Neil Hayes; Charles M Perou; Heather K Schmidt; Li Ding; Richard K Wilson; David Van Den Berg; Hui Shen; Henrik Bengtsson; Pierre Neuvial; Leslie M Cope; Jonathan Buckley; James G Herman; Stephen B Baylin; Peter W Laird; Kenneth Aldape
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 31.743

4.  High-resolution analysis of paraffin-embedded and formalin-fixed prostate tumors using comparative genomic hybridization to genomic microarrays.

Authors:  Pamela L Paris; Donna G Albertson; Janneke C Alers; Armann Andaya; Peter Carroll; Jane Fridlyand; Ajay N Jain; Sherwin Kamkar; David Kowbel; Pieter-Jaap Krijtenburg; Daniel Pinkel; Fritz H Schröder; Kees J Vissers; Vivienne J E Watson; Mark F Wildhagen; Colin Collins; Herman Van Dekken
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  An approach to analysis of large-scale correlations between genome changes and clinical endpoints in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  S Suzuki; D H Moore; D G Ginzinger; T E Godfrey; J Barclay; B Powell; D Pinkel; C Zaloudek; K Lu; G Mills; A Berchuck; J W Gray
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Genetic signature of oligoastrocytomas correlates with tumor location and denotes distinct molecular subsets.

Authors:  Wolf Mueller; Christian Hartmann; Annegret Hoffmann; Wolfgang Lanksch; Jürgen Kiwit; Jörg Tonn; Julian Veelken; Johannes Schramm; Michael Weller; Otmar D Wiestler; David N Louis; Andreas von Deimling
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 7.  Molecular analysis of glioblastoma: pathway profiling and its implications for patient therapy.

Authors:  Paul S Mischel; Stanley F Nelson; Timothy F Cloughesy
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 8.  DNA-microarray analysis of brain cancer: molecular classification for therapy.

Authors:  Paul S Mischel; Timothy F Cloughesy; Stanley F Nelson
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Shared allelic losses on chromosomes 1p and 19q suggest a common origin of oligodendroglioma and oligoastrocytoma.

Authors:  J A Kraus; J Koopmann; P Kaskel; D Maintz; S Brandner; J Schramm; D N Louis; O D Wiestler; A von Deimling
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.685

10.  Subsets of glioblastoma multiforme defined by molecular genetic analysis.

Authors:  A von Deimling; K von Ammon; D Schoenfeld; O D Wiestler; B R Seizinger; D N Louis
Journal:  Brain Pathol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.508

View more
  10 in total

1.  Genomic changes in gliomas detected using single nucleotide polymorphism array in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue: superior results compared with microsatellite analysis.

Authors:  Shuko Harada; Lindsay B Henderson; James R Eshleman; Christopher D Gocke; Peter Burger; Constance A Griffin; Denise A S Batista
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 2.  Molecular pathologic diagnosis of epidermal growth factor receptor.

Authors:  Cecile L Maire; Keith L Ligon
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  Identification of a novel population in high-grade oligodendroglial tumors not deleted on 1p/19q using array CGH.

Authors:  Matthieu Talagas; Pascale Marcorelles; Arnaud Uguen; Sylvia Redon; Isabelle Quintin-Roué; Sebastian Costa; Claude Férec; Frédéric Morel; Phong Dam Hieu; Marc De Braekeleer
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Microfoci of malignant progression in diffuse low-grade gliomas: towards the creation of an intermediate grade in glioma classification?

Authors:  Zoé Pedeutour-Braccini; Fanny Burel-Vandenbos; Catherine Gozé; Coralie Roger; Audrey Bazin; Valérie Costes-Martineau; Hugues Duffau; Valérie Rigau
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Molecular Analysis of Pediatric Oligodendrogliomas Highlights Genetic Differences with Adult Counterparts and Other Pediatric Gliomas.

Authors:  David Nauen; Lisa Haley; Ming-Tseh Lin; Arie Perry; Caterina Giannini; Peter C Burger; Fausto J Rodriguez
Journal:  Brain Pathol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 6.508

Review 6.  Diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma.

Authors:  Alexandra McAleenan; Hayley E Jones; Ashleigh Kernohan; Tomos Robinson; Lena Schmidt; Sarah Dawson; Claire Kelly; Emmelyn Spencer Leal; Claire L Faulkner; Abigail Palmer; Christopher Wragg; Sarah Jefferies; Sebastian Brandner; Luke Vale; Julian Pt Higgins; Kathreena M Kurian
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-03-02

7.  Something old and something new about molecular diagnostics in gliomas.

Authors:  Craig Horbinski
Journal:  Surg Pathol Clin       Date:  2012-12-01

8.  Chromosomal aberrations in bladder cancer: fresh versus formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue and targeted FISH versus wide microarray-based CGH analysis.

Authors:  Elena Panzeri; Donatella Conconi; Laura Antolini; Serena Redaelli; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; Giorgio Bovo; Francesco Pallotti; Paolo Viganò; Guido Strada; Leda Dalprà; Angela Bentivegna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  DNA fragmentation simulation method (FSM) and fragment size matching improve aCGH performance of FFPE tissues.

Authors:  Justin M Craig; Natalie Vena; Shakti Ramkissoon; Ahmed Idbaih; Shaun D Fouse; Memet Ozek; Aydin Sav; D Ashley Hill; Linda R Margraf; Charles G Eberhart; Mark W Kieran; Andrew D Norden; Patrick Y Wen; Massimo Loda; Sandro Santagata; Keith L Ligon; Azra H Ligon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparison of whole genome amplification methods for analysis of DNA extracted from microdissected early breast lesions in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue.

Authors:  Nona Arneson; Juan Moreno; Vladimir Iakovlev; Arezou Ghazani; Keisha Warren; David McCready; Igor Jurisica; Susan J Done
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2012-03-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.