| Literature DB >> 21080086 |
Merlijn Hutteman1, Hak Soo Choi, J Sven D Mieog, Joost R van der Vorst, Yoshitomo Ashitate, Peter J K Kuppen, Marian C van Groningen, Clemens W G M Löwik, Vincent T H B M Smit, Cornelis J H van de Velde, John V Frangioni, Alexander L Vahrmeijer.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in colorectal cancer may have prognostic and therapeutic significance; however, currently available techniques are not optimal. We hypothesized that the combination of invisible near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent light and ex vivo injection could solve remaining problems of SLN mapping in colorectal cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21080086 PMCID: PMC3052497 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1426-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Surg Oncol ISSN: 1068-9265 Impact factor: 5.344
Fig. 1FLARE image-guided surgery system. The dichroic mirror directs light below and above 650 nm to a color video camera and NIR fluorescence camera, respectively, permitting simultaneous acquisition of color video and NIR fluorescence images. The surgeon’s monitor includes a pseudocolored (lime green) merge of the 2 images
Preclinical in vivo and ex vivo identification rates for SLN mapping of pig colon and rectum with HSA800
| Organ | Number of injections ( | Successful identifications, | Number of SLNs identified, | Average identification time, sec |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colon | ||||
| In vivo | 8 | 8 (100%) | 9 | 56.4 ± 48.3 |
| Ex vivo | 8 | 8 (100%) | 8 | 58.8 ± 36.2 |
| Rectum | ||||
| In vivo | 8 | 8 (100%) | 10 | 54.1 ± 16.3 |
| Ex vivo | 8 | 8 (100%) | 9 | 26.8 ± 21.3 |
Fig. 2In vivo and ex vivo SLN mapping in colon and rectum. a Identification of the SLN (arrows) in pig colon after in vivo (top row) or ex vivo (bottom row) injection (arrowheads) of 0.1 cc of 10 μM HSA800. Shown are the color video (left), NIR fluorescence (middle), and pseudocolored (lime green) merge of the 2 (right). b Ex vivo identification of the SLN (arrow) after injection (arrowhead) of 0.1 cc of 10 μM HSA800 (top row). Resected negative (−) and positive (+) nodes in rectum (bottom row). Shown are the color video (left), NIR fluorescence (middle), and pseudocolored (lime green) merge of the 2 (right). Note accumulation of the dye at the sinus entry site. c H&E histological staining of the (+) tissue section (100× magnification) from b
Patient characteristics and results of sentinel lymph node mapping
| Patient | Age (year) | Body mass index | Tumor location | Tumor differentiation | Tumor size (cm) | Tumor stage | NIR-identified SLNs | Tumor positive SLNs | Total LN | Total LN+ | False negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 80 | 24 | Cecum | Moderately | 6.0 | T3 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 0 | No |
| 2 | 69 | 29 | Cecum | Moderately | 5.5 | T3 | 3 | 0 | 20 | 0 | No |
| 3 | 66 | 21 | Cecum | Moderately | 6.7 | T3 | 3 | 0 | 18 | 0 | No |
| 4 | 38 | 39 | Cecum | Moderately | 3.5 | T4 | 2 | 0 | 20 | 0 | No |
| 5 | 92 | 27 | Cecum | Moderately | 4 | T3 | 4 | 2 | 12 | 3 | No |
| 6 | 65 | 16 | Cecum | Moderately | 1.3 | T2 | 5 | 0 | 12 | 0 | No |
| 7 | 68 | 21 | Ascending colon | Moderately | 5 | T4 | 5 | 1 | 24 | 5 | No |
| 8 | 67 | 35 | Ascending colon | Moderately | 4 | T3 | 3 | 0 | 31 | 0 | No |
| 9 | 75 | 26 | Ascending colon | Moderately | 4 | T3 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 0 | No |
| 10 | 67 | 37 | Ascending colon | Moderately | 2.3 | T2 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 0 | No |
| 11 | 67 | 26 | Ascending colon | Moderately | 5 | T2 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 1 | Yes |
| 12 | 77 | 24 | Hepatic flexure | Poorly | 4.7 | T3 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 1 | No |
| 13 | 91 | 29 | Hepatic flexure | Moderately | 3.8 | T4 | 4 | 2 | 18 | 9 | No |
| 14 | 43 | 38 | Hepatic flexure | Moderately | 4 | T3 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 0 | No |
| 15 | 75 | 26 | Hepatic flexure | Moderately | 4.5 | T3 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 0 | No |
| 16 | 68 | 28 | Transverse colon | Moderately | 2.5 | T1 | 3 | 2 | 16 | 6 | No |
| 17 | 48 | 28 | Sigmoid | Well | 3 | T2 | 5 | 1 | 10 | 2 | No |
| 18 | 33 | 21 | Sigmoid | Moderately | 4 | T3 | 3 | 0 | 18 | 0 | No |
| 19 | 46 | 28 | Sigmoid | Moderately | 4.5 | T3 | 3 | 0 | 14 | 0 | No |
| 20 | 71 | 27 | Rectum | Poorly | 2.6 | T1 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 0 | No |
| 21 | 25 | 22 | Rectum | Moderately | 5.5 | T3 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 5 | No |
| 22 | 76 | 21 | Rectum | Minimal residual focia | n/aa | T2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 0 | No |
| 23 | 52 | 24 | Rectum | Moderately | 3 | T2 | 5 | 0 | 17 | 0 | No |
| 24 | 46 | 29 | Rectum | Moderately | 2 | T3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 1 | No |
| Mean | 62.7 | 26.9 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 15.9 |
SLN sentinel lymph node, NIR near-infrared, LN lymph node, LN+ lymph node with histologically proven metastases
Tumor stage was determined by TNM classification
aPatient received neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy with a near-complete pathological response
Fig. 3NIR fluorescence-guided SLN mapping in patients with colorectal cancer. a Ex vivo identification of a SLN (arrow) in the mesentery of the right hemicolon of a patient with a cecal adenocarcinoma after submucosal peritumoral injection (arrowhead) of 1 cc of 50 μM HSA800. Shown are the color video (left), NIR fluorescence (middle), and pseudocolored (lime green) merge of the 2 (right). b Ex vivo identification of a SLN (arrow) in the mesorectum of a patient with a rectal adenocarcinoma after submucosal peritumoral injection (arrowhead) of 1 cc of 50 μM HSA800. After 48 h fixation in 2% buffered formalin, tissue specimen was sliced and imaged. Shown are the color video (left), NIR fluorescence (middle), and pseudocolored (lime green) merge of the 2 (right)
Fig. 4Palpable metastatic lesion identified in the mesenteric fat. H&E histological staining of a mesenteric metastasis (25× magnification) not identified as a SLN. No nodal tissue was observed