Literature DB >> 21079137

BRCA1-associated breast cancers present differently from BRCA2-associated and familial cases: long-term follow-up of the Dutch MRISC Screening Study.

Adriana J Rijnsburger1, Inge-Marie Obdeijn, Reinoutje Kaas, Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst, Carla Boetes, Claudette E Loo, Martin N J M Wasser, Elisabeth Bergers, Theo Kok, Sara H Muller, Hans Peterse, Rob A E M Tollenaar, Nicoline Hoogerbrugge, Sybren Meijer, Carina C M Bartels, Caroline Seynaeve, Maartje J Hooning, Mieke Kriege, Paul I M Schmitz, Jan C Oosterwijk, Harry J de Koning, Emiel J T Rutgers, Jan G M Klijn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Dutch MRI Screening Study on early detection of hereditary breast cancer started in 1999. We evaluated the long-term results including separate analyses of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and first results on survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with higher than 15% cumulative lifetime risk (CLTR) of breast cancer were screened with biannual clinical breast examination and annual mammography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Participants were divided into subgroups: carriers of a gene mutation (50% to 85% CLTR) and two familial groups with high (30% to 50% CLTR) or moderate risk (15% to 30% CLTR).
RESULTS: Our update contains 2,157 eligible women including 599 mutation carriers (median follow-up of 4.9 years from entry) with 97 primary breast cancers detected (median follow-up of 5.0 years from diagnosis). MRI sensitivity was superior to that of mammography for invasive cancer (77.4% v 35.5%; P<.00005), but not for ductal carcinoma in situ. Results in the BRCA1 group were worse compared to the BRCA2, the high-, and the moderate-risk groups, respectively, for mammography sensitivity (25.0% v 61.5%, 45.5%, 46.7%), tumor size at diagnosis≤1 cm (21.4% v 61.5%, 40.9%, 63.6%), proportion of DCIS (6.5% v 18.8%, 14.8%, 31.3%) and interval cancers (32.3% v 6.3%, 3.7%, 6.3%), and age at diagnosis younger than 30 years (9.7% v 0%). Cumulative distant metastasis-free and overall survival at 6 years in all 42 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with invasive breast cancer were 83.9% (95% CI, 64.1% to 93.3%) and 92.7% (95% CI, 79.0% to 97.6%), respectively, and 100% in the familial groups (n=43).
CONCLUSION: Screening results were somewhat worse in BRCA1 mutation carriers, but 6-year survival was high in all risk groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21079137     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.2294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  33 in total

Review 1.  Clinical and epidemiological issues in mammographic density.

Authors:  Valentina Assi; Jane Warwick; Jack Cuzick; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Performance Measures of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Plus Mammography in the High Risk Ontario Breast Screening Program.

Authors:  Anna M Chiarelli; Kristina M Blackmore; Derek Muradali; Susan J Done; Vicky Majpruz; Ashini Weerasinghe; Lucia Mirea; Andrea Eisen; Linda Rabeneck; Ellen Warner
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Breast cancer screening: an evidence-based update.

Authors:  Mackenzie S Fuller; Christoph I Lee; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 5.456

4.  Breast cancer detection and tumor characteristics in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Julia Krammer; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Mark E Robson; Mithat Gönen; Blanca Bernard-Davila; Elizabeth A Morris; Debra A Mangino; Maxine S Jochelson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Screening Breast MRI Outcomes in Routine Clinical Practice: Comparison to BI-RADS Benchmarks.

Authors:  Roberta M Strigel; Jennifer Rollenhagen; Elizabeth S Burnside; Mai Elezaby; Amy M Fowler; Frederick Kelcz; Lonie Salkowski; Wendy B DeMartini
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Advanced Imaging for Precision Medicine in Breast Cancer: From Morphology to Function.

Authors:  Katja Pinker
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 7.  Clinical management of hereditary breast cancer syndromes.

Authors:  Amy S Clark; Susan M Domchek
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.673

8.  The relationship of breast density in mammography and magnetic resonance imaging in high-risk women and women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Marissa Albert; Freya Schnabel; Jennifer Chun; Shira Schwartz; Jiyon Lee; Ana Paula Klautau Leite; Linda Moy
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 1.605

9.  Discrimination of benign and malignant breast lesions by using shutter-speed dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Luminita A Tudorica; Xin Li; Sunitha B Thakur; Yiyi Chen; Elizabeth A Morris; Ian J Tagge; Maayan E Korenblit; William D Rooney; Jason A Koutcher; Charles S Springer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Genetic risk assessments in individuals at high risk for inherited breast cancer in the breast oncology care setting.

Authors:  Tuya Pal; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.