Literature DB >> 21077984

Real-time PCR assays compared to culture-based approaches for identification of aerobic bacteria in chronic wounds.

J H Melendez1, Y M Frankel, A T An, L Williams, L B Price, N-Y Wang, G S Lazarus, J M Zenilman.   

Abstract

Chronic wounds cause substantial morbidity and disability. Infection in chronic wounds is clinically defined by routine culture methods that can take several days to obtain a final result, and may not fully describe the community of organisms or biome within these wounds. Molecular diagnostic approaches offer promise for a more rapid and complete assessment. We report the development of a suite of real-time PCR assays for rapid identification of bacteria directly from tissue samples. The panel of assays targets 14 common, clinically relevant, aerobic pathogens and demonstrates a high degree of sensitivity and specificity using a panel of organisms commonly associated with chronic wound infection. Thirty-nine tissue samples from 29 chronic wounds were evaluated and the results compared with those obtained by culture. As revealed by culture and PCR, the most common organisms were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) followed by Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B streptococcus) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The sensitivities of the PCR assays were 100% and 90% when quantitative and qualitative culture results were used as the reference standard, respectively. The assays allowed the identification of bacterial DNA from ten additional organisms that were not revealed by quantitative or qualitative cultures. Under optimal conditions, the turnaround time for PCR results is as short as 4-6 h. Real-time PCR is a rapid and inexpensive approach that can be easily introduced into clinical practice for detection of organisms directly from tissue samples. Characterization of the anaerobic microflora by real-time PCR of chronic wounds is warranted.
© 2010 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2010 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21077984     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03158.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  18 in total

Review 1.  Association Between Microbial Bioburden and Healing Outcomes in Venous Leg Ulcers: A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Marie S Tuttle
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  PCR offers no advantage over culture for microbiologic diagnosis in cellulitis.

Authors:  K E Johnson; D E Kiyatkin; A T An; S Riedel; J Melendez; J M Zenilman
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  Angular photodiode array-based device to detect bacterial pathogens in a wound model.

Authors:  Robin E Sweeney; Jeong-Yeol Yoon
Journal:  IEEE Sens J       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.301

Review 4.  The diagnosis of infection in chronic leg ulcers: A narrative review on clinical practice.

Authors:  Ut T Bui; Kathleen Finlayson; Helen Edwards
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Molecular and culture-based assessment of the microbial diversity of diabetic chronic foot wounds and contralateral skin sites.

Authors:  Angela Oates; Frank L Bowling; Andrew J M Boulton; Andrew J McBain
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Metabolic modelling of chronic wound microbiota predicts mutualistic interactions that drive community composition.

Authors:  P Phalak; M A Henson
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.772

7.  The importance of a multifaceted approach to characterizing the microbial flora of chronic wounds.

Authors:  Anne Han; Jonathan M Zenilman; Johan H Melendez; Mark E Shirtliff; Alessandra Agostinho; Garth James; Philip S Stewart; Emmanuel F Mongodin; Dhana Rao; Alexander H Rickard; Gerald S Lazarus
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 8.  Challenges and innovations in treating chronic and acute wound infections: from basic science to clinical practice.

Authors:  Xiaotong Ding; Qinghan Tang; Zeyu Xu; Ye Xu; Hao Zhang; Dongfeng Zheng; Shuqin Wang; Qian Tan; Joanneke Maitz; Peter K Maitz; Shaoping Yin; Yiwei Wang; Jun Chen
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2022-05-21

Review 9.  Infection in Venous Leg Ulcers: Considerations for Optimal Management in the Elderly.

Authors:  Douglas J Pugliese
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  Clinical identification of bacteria in human chronic wound infections: culturing vs. 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing.

Authors:  Daniel D Rhoads; Stephen B Cox; Eric J Rees; Yan Sun; Randall D Wolcott
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 3.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.