Literature DB >> 21077000

Diagnostic value of elastosonographically determined strain index in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules.

Bekir Cakir1, Cevdet Aydin, Birol Korukluoğlu, Didem Ozdemir, I Cagatay Sisman, Dilek Tüzün, Ayten Oguz, Gülnur Güler, Güven Güney, Ahmet Kuşdemir, S Yavuz Sanisoglu, Reyhan Ersoy.   

Abstract

Elastosonography (ES) is a newly developed method that is used for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. In different studies, ES scoring has been compared with histopathological findings, and sensitivity and specificity of the scoring were calculated. In this study, it determines the strain index (SI) as well as the ES to score thyroid nodules, and establishes the role for these parameters in the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules using histopathological analysis as a reference standard. Real-time ES in transverse axis (TA) and longitudinal axis (LA) was performed in 391 nodules of 292 patients. ES scoring was made for all the nodules. SI in TA and LA was calculated for four times in each nodule and mean values were determined. The results were compared with final histopathological diagnoses. In histopathological examinations, 125 (31.97%) of 391 nodules were malignant and 266 (68.03%) were benign. Of these histopathologically benign nodules, 189 (%71.05) were also probably benign according to elastosonographic scoring (scores of 1, 2, or 3), while 77 (28.95%) were probably malignant (scores of 4 or 5). Among 125 histopathologically malignant nodules, 52 (41.60%) were probably benign and 73 (58.40%) were probably malignant according to elastosonographic scoring. There was a significant relation between scoring and histopathological findings (χ(2) = 36.513; P < 0.001). Accordingly, sensitivity and specificity of ES scoring were 58.4 and 71.0%, respectively. ROC analysis value obtained for strain ratios in LA (AUC: 75.5%; P < 0.001) had a higher significance compared to ROC analysis value obtained for strain ratios in TA (AUC: 66.0%). Thus, ROC analysis evaluation was applied only for SI in LA. The optimal SI cut-off value in LA for all the nodules was found to be 16.709 (sensitivity: 73.4%, specificity: 70.0%) (AUC: 75.4 ± 0.03%; 70.2-80.5%). SI cut-off value corresponding to 90% sensitivity in this axis was 4.516 (specificity: 35.7%). Sensitivity and specificity of SI values that were determined according to morphological features of nodules in gray-scale ultrasonography were higher. For hypoechoic nodules with microcalcifications and without a halo, SI cut-off value, sensitivity, and specificity were 17.020, 84.3, and 81.1%, respectively. Our study is the first clinical-wide series study that measured, used, and compared the ES scoring and SI cut-off values for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. This study indicates that measurement of SI with ES as a noninvasive procedure may be used as an adjunctive method to the conventional methods for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21077000     DOI: 10.1007/s12020-010-9416-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocrine        ISSN: 1355-008X            Impact factor:   3.633


  24 in total

Review 1.  Elastography: ultrasonic estimation and imaging of the elastic properties of tissues.

Authors:  J Ophir; S K Alam; B Garra; F Kallel; E Konofagou; T Krouskop; T Varghese
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.617

2.  Thyroid gland tumor diagnosis at US elastography.

Authors:  Andrej Lyshchik; Tatsuya Higashi; Ryo Asato; Shinzo Tanaka; Juichi Ito; Jerome J Mai; Claire Pellot-Barakat; Michael F Insana; Aaron B Brill; Tsuneo Saga; Masahiro Hiraoka; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Management of thyroid nodules detected at US: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference statement.

Authors:  Mary C Frates; Carol B Benson; J William Charboneau; Edmund S Cibas; Orlo H Clark; Beverly G Coleman; John J Cronan; Peter M Doubilet; Douglas B Evans; John R Goellner; Ian D Hay; Barbara S Hertzberg; Charles M Intenzo; R Brooke Jeffrey; Jill E Langer; P Reed Larsen; Susan J Mandel; William D Middleton; Carl C Reading; Steven I Sherman; Franklin N Tessler
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.657

4.  The predictive value of ultrasound findings in the management of thyroid nodules.

Authors:  C Cappelli; M Castellano; I Pirola; D Cumetti; B Agosti; E Gandossi; E Agabiti Rosei
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2006-12-17

5.  Distinct diagnostic criteria for ultrasonographic examination of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Hiroki Shimura; Kazutaka Haraguchi; Yoshimitsu Hiejima; Nobuhiro Fukunari; Yasuhisa Fujimoto; Makoto Katagiri; Noriko Koyanagi; Takeaki Kurita; Megumi Miyakawa; Yukio Miyamoto; Noriyuki Suzuki; Shin-Ichi Suzuki; Masako Kanbe; Yasuyuki Kato; Tsukasa Murakami; Eriko Tohno; Hiroko Tsunoda-Shimizu; Keiko Yamada; Ei Ueno; Kaoru Kobayashi; Tetsuro Kobayashi; Tamotsu Yokozawa; Masafumi Kitaoka
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.568

6.  American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and Associazione Medici Endocrinologi medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Hossein Gharib; Enrico Papini; Roberto Valcavi; H Jack Baskin; Anna Crescenzi; Massimo E Dottorini; Daniel S Duick; Rinaldo Guglielmi; Carlos Robert Hamilton; Martha A Zeiger; Michele Zini
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.443

7.  High prevalence of carcinoma in ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Dong-Lim Kim; Kee-Ho Song; Suk Kyeong Kim
Journal:  Endocr J       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 2.349

8.  Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules at elastosonography.

Authors:  L Rubaltelli; S Corradin; A Dorigo; M Stabilito; A Tregnaghi; S Borsato; R Stramare
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 6.548

9.  Role of ultrasonography in predicting malignancy in patients with thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Hyeong-Gon Moon; Eun-Jung Jung; Soon-Tae Park; Woo-Song Ha; Sang-Kyung Choi; Soon-Chan Hong; Young-Joon Lee; Young-Tae Joo; Chi-Young Jeong; Dae-Seob Choi; Jae-Wook Ryoo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Elastography: new developments in ultrasound for predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules.

Authors:  T Rago; F Santini; M Scutari; A Pinchera; P Vitti
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 5.958

View more
  25 in total

1.  Value of strain-ratio on thyroid real-time sonoelastography.

Authors:  Manlio Guazzaroni; Alessio Spinelli; Irene Coco; Costantino Del Giudice; Valentina Girardi; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Is there a real diagnostic impact of elastosonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the management of thyroid nodules?

Authors:  Massimo Giusti; Davide Orlandi; Giulia Melle; Barbara Massa; Enzo Silvestri; Francesco Minuto; Gianni Turtulici
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  Prospective evaluation in 123 patients of strain ratio as provided by quantitative elastosonography and multiparametric ultrasound evaluation (ultrasound score) for the characterisation of thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Vito Cantisani; Vito D'Andrea; Ester Mancuso; Elena Maggini; Mattia Di Segni; Matteo Olive; Pietro Lodise; Silvio Palermo; Sergio De Antoni; Adriano Redler; Gregorio Patrizi; Andrea Porfiri; Giovanna Panzironi; Paolo Ricci
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Elastographic techniques of thyroid gland: current status.

Authors:  Massimiliano Andrioli; Luca Persani
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.633

5.  Elastosonographic strain index in thyroid nodules with atypia of undetermined significance.

Authors:  B Cakir; R Ersoy; F N Cuhaci; C Aydin; B Polat; M Kılıc; A Yazgan
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Diagnostic performance of elastography in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Francesca Garino; Maurilio Deandrea; Manuela Motta; Alberto Mormile; Federico Ragazzoni; Nicola Palestini; Milena Freddi; Guido Gasparri; Enrico Sgotto; Donatella Pacchioni; Paolo Piero Limone
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.633

7.  The value of real-time ultrasound elastography in chronic autoimmune thyroiditis.

Authors:  M S Menzilcioglu; M Duymus; G Gungor; S Citil; T Sahin; S N Boysan; A Sarica
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Thin core biopsy should help to discriminate thyroid nodules cytologically classified as indeterminate. A new sampling technique.

Authors:  Naim Nasrollah; Pierpaolo Trimboli; Leo Guidobaldi; Davide Domenico Cicciarella Modica; Claudio Ventura; Giovanni Ramacciato; Silvia Taccogna; Francesco Romanelli; Stefano Valabrega; Anna Crescenzi
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.633

9.  Elastography in the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules in Hashimoto thyroiditis.

Authors:  Mustafa Şahin; Erman Çakal; Mustafa Özbek; Aşkin Güngünes; Müyesser Sayki Arslan; Esra Tutal Akkaymak; Bekir Uçan; Ilknur Öztürk Ünsal; Nujen Çolak Bozkurt; Tuncay Delibaşi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  The frequency of malignancy and the relationship between malignancy and ultrasonographic features of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology.

Authors:  Yasemin Tutuncu; Dilek Berker; Serhat Isik; Gulhan Akbaba; Ufuk Ozuguz; Ferit Kerim Kucukler; Erdal Göcmen; Yavuz Yalcın; Yusuf Aydin; Serdar Guler
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 3.633

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.