Literature DB >> 21076969

A novel methodology independent of fermentation rate for assessment of the fructophilic character of wine yeast strains.

T Liccioli1, P J Chambers, V Jiranek.   

Abstract

The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has a fundamental role in fermenting grape juice to wine. During alcoholic fermentation its catabolic activity converts sugars (which in grape juice are a near equal ratio of glucose and fructose) and other grape compounds into ethanol, carbon dioxide and sensorily important metabolites. However, S. cerevisiae typically utilises glucose and fructose with different efficiency: glucose is preferred and is consumed at a higher rate than fructose. This results in an increasing difference between the concentrations of glucose and fructose during fermentation. In this study 20 commercially available strains were investigated to determine their relative abilities to utilise glucose and fructose. Parameters measured included fermentation duration and the kinetics of utilisation of fructose when supplied as sole carbon source or in an equimolar mix with glucose. The data were then analysed using mathematical calculations in an effort to identify fermentation attributes which were indicative of overall fructose utilisation and fermentation performance. Fermentation durations ranged from 74.6 to over 150 h, with clear differences in the degree to which glucose utilisation was preferential. Given this variability we sought to gain a more holistic indication of strain performance that was independent of fermentation rate and therefore utilized the area under the curve (AUC) of fermentation of individual or combined sugars. In this way it was possible to rank the 20 strains for their ability to consume fructose relative to glucose. Moreover, it was shown that fermentations performed in media containing fructose as sole carbon source did not predict the fructophilicity of strains in wine-like conditions (equimolar mixture of glucose and fructose). This work provides important information for programs which seek to generate strains that are faster or more reliable fermenters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21076969     DOI: 10.1007/s10295-010-0854-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1367-5435            Impact factor:   3.346


  24 in total

1.  Regulatory properties of the constitutive hexose transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  R Serrano; G Delafuente
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  1974-12-20       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 2.  The chemistry and biochemistry of the sweetness of sugars.

Authors:  C K Lee
Journal:  Adv Carbohydr Chem Biochem       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 12.200

3.  Quantitative analysis of wine yeast gene expression profiles under winemaking conditions.

Authors:  Cristian Varela; Javier Cárdenas; Francisco Melo; Eduardo Agosin
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 3.239

Review 4.  Function and regulation of yeast hexose transporters.

Authors:  S Ozcan; M Johnston
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 5.  Glucose-sensing mechanisms in eukaryotic cells.

Authors:  F Rolland; J Winderickx; J M Thevelein
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 13.807

6.  Analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae hexose carrier expression during wine fermentation: both low- and high-affinity Hxt transporters are expressed.

Authors:  Marc Perez; Kattie Luyten; Remy Michel; Christine Riou; Bruno Blondin
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Role of hexose transport in control of glycolytic flux in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Karin Elbing; Christer Larsson; Roslyn M Bill; Eva Albers; Jacky L Snoep; Eckhard Boles; Stefan Hohmann; Lena Gustafsson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Differences in the glucose and fructose consumption profiles in diverse Saccharomyces wine species and their hybrids during grape juice fermentation.

Authors:  Jordi Tronchoni; Amparo Gamero; Francisco Noé Arroyo-López; Eladio Barrio; Amparo Querol
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 5.277

9.  Application of a substrate inhibition model to estimate the effect of fructose concentration on the growth of diverse Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.

Authors:  F Noé Arroyo-López; Amparo Querol; Eladio Barrio
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 3.346

10.  Involvement of kinases in glucose and fructose uptake by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  L F Bisson; D G Fraenkel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  3 in total

1.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae and metabolic activators: HXT3 gene expression and fructose/glucose discrepancy in sluggish fermentation conditions.

Authors:  Patricia Díaz-Hellín; Victoria Naranjo; Juan Úbeda; Ana Briones
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Directed evolution as an approach to increase fructose utilization in synthetic grape juice by wine yeast AWRI 796.

Authors:  Michelle E Walker; Tommaso L Watson; Christopher R L Large; Yan Berkovich; Tom A Lang; Maitreya J Dunham; Sean Formby; Vladimir Jiranek
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 2.923

3.  Mild Pretreatments to Increase Fructose Consumption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Wine Yeast Strains.

Authors:  Hatice Aybuke Karaoglan; Filiz Ozcelik; Alida Musatti; Manuela Rollini
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-05-19
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.